A COHERENT AND EFFECTİVE FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLİCY FOR THE EUROPEAN UNİON? : THE CASES OF THE YUGOSLAV CRİSİS AND THE IRAQ CRİSİS

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

A COHERENT AND EFFECTİVE FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLİCY FOR THE EUROPEAN UNİON? : THE CASES OF THE YUGOSLAV CRİSİS AND THE IRAQ CRİSİS

Öz

The main objective of this article is to investigate the coherence and effectiveness of the European Union’s foreign and security policy. It seeks to find answers to three main questions: how coherent is the EU in conducting its foreign and security policy?; Is coherence an essential criterion for the effectiveness of the EU’s foreign and security policy?; Does incoherence undermine the EU’s effectiveness as a foreign and security policy actor? This article seeks to find answers to these questions by focusing on two empirical case-studies, the Yugoslav crisis in early 1990s and the Iraq crisis in 2003, in which the EU Member States had acted unilaterally and incoherently and consequently undermined the Union’s effectiveness and international credibility as a foreign and security policy actor. The main argument of this article is that in order to make the EU a credible and effective foreign and security policy actor in global politics, the EU Member States have to recognize the fact that they ought to act collectively as a coherent actor and speak with one voice. Their influence on prominent international issues will be greater if they act collectively as a coherent actor rather than acting individually, and they should sacrifice their individual national interests for the sake of common interests of the EU. The EU Member States’ solo diplomacy and their diverging voices undermined the effectiveness and international credibility of the EU as observed in two case-studies

Anahtar Kelimeler

• The European Union, Coherence, Effectiveness, Yugoslav Crisis, Iraq Crisis

Kaynakça

1. Abellan, Miguel Angel Medina (2002), The Coherence of the European Foreign Policy: a Real Barrier of an Academic Term, Institut Universitari D’estudis Europeus Working Paper, No. 27.
2. Brenner, Michael (2003), The CFSP Factor: A Comparison of United States and French Strategies, Cooperation and Conflict, Journal of Nordic International Studies Association, Vol. 38, No. 3, 187-209.
3. Crowe, Brian (2003), A Common European Foreign Policy After Iraq?, International Affairs, Vol.79, no. 3, 533–546.
4. Crowe, Brian (2004), A Common European Foreign Policy After Iraq?, in: Holland, Martin (ed.), Common Foreign and Security Policy: The First Ten Years, London: Continuum, 28-43.
5. Dalgaard-Nielsen, Anja (2003), Gulf War: The German Resistance, Survival, Vol. 45, No. 1, 99-116.
6. Dittrich, Mirjam (2003), Europe in the World, EU-Iraq: A Brief Chronology, Working Papers, http://www.theepc.net.
7. Duke, Simon (1999), Consistency as an Issue in EU External Relations, Working Paper, European Institute of Public Administration, No. 6.
8. Ginsberg, Roy H. (2001), The European Union in International Politics: Baptism By Fire, USA: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers Inc.

9. Ginsberg, Roy H. (2002), Ten Years of European Union Foreign Policy, Baptism, Confirmation, Validation, Heinrich Böll Foundation, Washington Office.
10. Grant, Charles (2001), A Stronger European Foreign and Defence Policy, in: Bannerman, Edward et.al. (eds.), Europe After September 11, London: CER, 31-48. th
11. Grant, Charles (2002), The Eleventh September and Beyond: The Impact on the European Union, The Political Quarterly, Vol. 73, Iss. 1, 135-153.
12. Hill, Christopher (1993), The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, No.3, 305- 328.
13. Hill, Christopher (2004), Renationalizing or Regrouping? EU Foreign Policy Since 11 September 2001, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 42, No.1, 143-163.
14. Kaya, Taylan Özgür (2005), Constituting the Common Foreign and Security Policy: The European Union’s Pursuit of Being a Coherent and Effective Foreign and Security Policy Actor in Global Politics, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Vol. 5, No. 9, 123-153. Available at http://www.akdeniz.edu.tr/iibf/dergi/Sayi09/11Kaya.pdf.
15. Kintis, G., Andreas (1999), Between Ambition and Paralysis: The European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and the War in the Former Yugoslavia, in: Hodge, Carl Cavanagh (ed.), Redefining European Security, New York: Garland Publishing, 273-298.
16. Missiroli, Antonio (2001), European Security Policy: The Challenge of Coherence, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 6, Iss 2, 177-196.
17. Mulay-Shah, Aziz (2001), Kantian dreams, A Constructivist Critique of Mainstream Research on Political Cooperation Within Europe, Paper presented at the Graduate Workshop of the Jean Monnet Center for European Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, 22-25 April. http://web.uvic.ca/hrdceu/documents/Kantian .doc.
18. Nuttall, Simon J. (2000), European Foreign Policy, United States: Oxford University Press.
19. Salmon, Trevor J. (1992), Testing Times for European Political Cooperation: the Gulf and Yugoslavia, 1990-1992, International Affairs, Vol. 68, No. 2, 233-253.
20. Sjursen, Helene (2003), Understanding The Common Foreign and Security Policy: Analytical Building Blocs, in: Knodt, Michéle and Princen, Sebastiaan (eds.), Understanding the European Union’s External Relations, London: Routledge, 35-53.
21. Smith, Michael E. (2004), Europe’s Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Tonra, Ben (2003), Constructing the Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Utility of a Cognitive Approach, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4, 731-756.
23. Wyatt-Walter, Holly (1997), The European Community and Security Dilemma,1979- 1992, Macmillan Press: London.