BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 95 - 120, 01.06.2006

Arş. Gör. Ali Orhan Aydın

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • 1. Aydin, A. O., (2005). Dagitik Yapay Zeka: Tepkili-Nedensel Mimarinin Oykusu (Distributed Artificial Intelligence: Story of Reactive-Causal Architecture), Denizli, Turkey, Egecom Yayinlari.
  • 2. Barwise, J. ve Perry, J., Situations and Attitudes. 1983, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • 3. Bond, A. H. ve Gasser, L., (1988). Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • 4. Bradshaw, J., (1997). Introduction to software agents. Software agents. J. Bradshaw. Cambridge, MA, AAAI Press/The MIT Press: 1-46.
  • 5. Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.J. ve Pollack, M.E., Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 1988. 4: p. 349–355.
  • 6. Bratman, M.E., Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. 1987, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 7. Brooks, R.A., Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 1991. 47: p. 139- 159.
  • 8. Cohen, P.R. ve Levesque, H.J., Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 1990. 42: p. 213–261.
  • 9. Cohen, P.R. ve Perrault, C.R., Elements of a plan based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 1979. 3: p. 177–212.
  • 10. Çüçen, A.K., Mantık. Vol. 2. 1999, Bursa: Asa Kitabevi. 11. Davies, N.J., Truth, Modality, and Action, in Department of Computer Science. 1993, University of Essex: Colchester, UK.
  • 12. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • 13. Devlin, K., Logic and Information. 1991, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • 14. Ferguson, I.A., TouringMachines: An Architecture for Dynamic, Rational, Mobile Agents. 1992, University of Cambridge: Clare Hall, UK.
  • 15. Fikes, R.E. ve Nilsson, N., STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 1971. 5(2): p. 189-208.
  • 16. Fischer, K., Müller, J. P. ve Pischel, M. (1996). "Cooperative transportation scheduling: An application domain for DAI." Applied Artificial Intelligence 10(1): 1-34.
  • 17. Heisenberg, W.C., The Physicist's Conception of Nature. 1958: Hutchinson & Co Publishers Ltd.
  • 18. Hintikka, J., Knowledge and Belief. 1962, Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. 19. James, G., Modal Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., Editörlüğünde. 2001.
  • 20. Jennings, N. R., Sycara, K. ve Wooldridge, M., (1998). "A roadmap of agent based systems, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems." Kluwer Academic Publishers 1(1): 7- 38.
  • 21. Jennings, N.R. ve Wooldridge, M., Applications of Intelligent Agents, Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications and Markets, N.R. Jennings ve Wooldridge, M., Editörlüğünde. 1998. p. 3-28.
  • 22. Joan, M., Intuitionistic Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., Editörlüğünde. 2002.
  • 23. Konolige, K., A deduction model of belief. 1986, San Mateo, CA: Pitman Publishing.
  • 24. Konolige, K., A first-order formalization of knowledge and action for a multi-agent planning system, Machine Intelligence 10, J.E. Hayes, D. Michie, ve Pao, Y., Editörlüğünde. 1982, Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Chichester, England. p. 41–72.
  • 25. Maes, P., Situated agents can have goals, Designing Autonomous Agents, Maes, P., Editörlüğünde. 1990, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 49–70.
  • 26. McCarthy, J., Ascribing mental qualities to machines. 1978, Stanford University AI Lab.: Stanford, CA.
  • 27. McCarthy, J., (1983). The Little Thoughts of Thinking Machines. Stanford, CA, Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
  • 28. McCarthy, J., What has AI in Common with Philosophy? 1996, Computer Science Department, Stanford University: Stanford, CA.
  • 29. Moore, R.C., A formal theory of knowledge and action, Readings in Planning, J.F. Allen, J. Hendler, ve Tate, A. Editörlüğünde, 1990, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Mateo, CA. p. 480–519.
  • 30. Nilsson, N.J., Eye on the Prize. AI Magazine, 1995. 16(2): p. 9-17. 31. Nwana, H. S., (1996). "Software agents: An overview." Knowledge Engineering Review 11(3): 205-244. 32. Penrose, R., (2000). Kralın Yeni Usu: Bilgisayar ve Zeka. Ankara, TÜBİTAK.
  • 33. Rao, A.S. ve Georgeff, M.P., Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R-91). 1991. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • 34. Ríha, A., Pechoucek, M., Vokrinek, J. ve Marik, V., ExPlanTech: Exploitation of AgentBased Technology in Production Planning. Multi-Agent Systems and Applications II. 2002: Springer Verlag.
  • 35. Russell, S.J. ve Norvig, P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 1995, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • 36. Searle, J.R., Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. 1969, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • 37. Shapiro, S., Classical Logic, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., Editörlüğünde. 2000.
  • 38. Shoham, Y., (1993). "Agent-Oriented programming." Artificial Intelligence 60(1): 51-92.
  • 39. Singh, M.P., (1994). Multiagent systems: A theoretical framework for intentions, knowhow, and communications. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • 40. Wooldridge, M. ve Fisher, M., A first-order branching time logic of multi-agent systems. The Tenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-92). 1992. Vienna, Austria.
  • 41. Wooldridge, M. ve Jennings, N.R., (1995). "Intelligent agents: Theory and practice." The Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2): 115-152.

AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 95 - 120, 01.06.2006

Arş. Gör. Ali Orhan Aydın

Öz

Purpose of this paper is to review the literature of Agent Based Systems. This research area became popular since 1980’s within Distributed Artificial Intelligence domain. Even though, it is a new emerging research area many research studies are performed regarding to its theory and practice. Moreover, there are many debates regarding to definition of Agency notion. By this review issues regarding to this notion is tried to be clarified by mostly citing reviews of Jennings et. al. and Jennings and Wooldridge. With this respect, from theory to practice every aspect of agency is tried to be explained

Anahtar Kelimeler

Agent Based Systems

Kaynakça

  • 1. Aydin, A. O., (2005). Dagitik Yapay Zeka: Tepkili-Nedensel Mimarinin Oykusu (Distributed Artificial Intelligence: Story of Reactive-Causal Architecture), Denizli, Turkey, Egecom Yayinlari.
  • 2. Barwise, J. ve Perry, J., Situations and Attitudes. 1983, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • 3. Bond, A. H. ve Gasser, L., (1988). Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • 4. Bradshaw, J., (1997). Introduction to software agents. Software agents. J. Bradshaw. Cambridge, MA, AAAI Press/The MIT Press: 1-46.
  • 5. Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.J. ve Pollack, M.E., Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 1988. 4: p. 349–355.
  • 6. Bratman, M.E., Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. 1987, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 7. Brooks, R.A., Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 1991. 47: p. 139- 159.
  • 8. Cohen, P.R. ve Levesque, H.J., Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 1990. 42: p. 213–261.
  • 9. Cohen, P.R. ve Perrault, C.R., Elements of a plan based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science, 1979. 3: p. 177–212.
  • 10. Çüçen, A.K., Mantık. Vol. 2. 1999, Bursa: Asa Kitabevi. 11. Davies, N.J., Truth, Modality, and Action, in Department of Computer Science. 1993, University of Essex: Colchester, UK.
  • 12. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • 13. Devlin, K., Logic and Information. 1991, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • 14. Ferguson, I.A., TouringMachines: An Architecture for Dynamic, Rational, Mobile Agents. 1992, University of Cambridge: Clare Hall, UK.
  • 15. Fikes, R.E. ve Nilsson, N., STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 1971. 5(2): p. 189-208.
  • 16. Fischer, K., Müller, J. P. ve Pischel, M. (1996). "Cooperative transportation scheduling: An application domain for DAI." Applied Artificial Intelligence 10(1): 1-34.
  • 17. Heisenberg, W.C., The Physicist's Conception of Nature. 1958: Hutchinson & Co Publishers Ltd.
  • 18. Hintikka, J., Knowledge and Belief. 1962, Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press. 19. James, G., Modal Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., Editörlüğünde. 2001.
  • 20. Jennings, N. R., Sycara, K. ve Wooldridge, M., (1998). "A roadmap of agent based systems, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems." Kluwer Academic Publishers 1(1): 7- 38.
  • 21. Jennings, N.R. ve Wooldridge, M., Applications of Intelligent Agents, Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications and Markets, N.R. Jennings ve Wooldridge, M., Editörlüğünde. 1998. p. 3-28.
  • 22. Joan, M., Intuitionistic Logic, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., Editörlüğünde. 2002.
  • 23. Konolige, K., A deduction model of belief. 1986, San Mateo, CA: Pitman Publishing.
  • 24. Konolige, K., A first-order formalization of knowledge and action for a multi-agent planning system, Machine Intelligence 10, J.E. Hayes, D. Michie, ve Pao, Y., Editörlüğünde. 1982, Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Chichester, England. p. 41–72.
  • 25. Maes, P., Situated agents can have goals, Designing Autonomous Agents, Maes, P., Editörlüğünde. 1990, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 49–70.
  • 26. McCarthy, J., Ascribing mental qualities to machines. 1978, Stanford University AI Lab.: Stanford, CA.
  • 27. McCarthy, J., (1983). The Little Thoughts of Thinking Machines. Stanford, CA, Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
  • 28. McCarthy, J., What has AI in Common with Philosophy? 1996, Computer Science Department, Stanford University: Stanford, CA.
  • 29. Moore, R.C., A formal theory of knowledge and action, Readings in Planning, J.F. Allen, J. Hendler, ve Tate, A. Editörlüğünde, 1990, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Mateo, CA. p. 480–519.
  • 30. Nilsson, N.J., Eye on the Prize. AI Magazine, 1995. 16(2): p. 9-17. 31. Nwana, H. S., (1996). "Software agents: An overview." Knowledge Engineering Review 11(3): 205-244. 32. Penrose, R., (2000). Kralın Yeni Usu: Bilgisayar ve Zeka. Ankara, TÜBİTAK.
  • 33. Rao, A.S. ve Georgeff, M.P., Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R-91). 1991. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • 34. Ríha, A., Pechoucek, M., Vokrinek, J. ve Marik, V., ExPlanTech: Exploitation of AgentBased Technology in Production Planning. Multi-Agent Systems and Applications II. 2002: Springer Verlag.
  • 35. Russell, S.J. ve Norvig, P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 1995, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • 36. Searle, J.R., Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. 1969, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • 37. Shapiro, S., Classical Logic, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E.N., Editörlüğünde. 2000.
  • 38. Shoham, Y., (1993). "Agent-Oriented programming." Artificial Intelligence 60(1): 51-92.
  • 39. Singh, M.P., (1994). Multiagent systems: A theoretical framework for intentions, knowhow, and communications. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • 40. Wooldridge, M. ve Fisher, M., A first-order branching time logic of multi-agent systems. The Tenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-92). 1992. Vienna, Austria.
  • 41. Wooldridge, M. ve Jennings, N.R., (1995). "Intelligent agents: Theory and practice." The Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2): 115-152.
Toplam 37 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Arş. Gör. Ali Orhan Aydın Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Aydın, A. G. A. O. (2006). AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 1(1), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.04823
AMA Aydın AGAO. AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. Haziran 2006;1(1):95-120. doi:10.19168/jyu.04823
Chicago Aydın, Arş. Gör. Ali Orhan. “AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 1, sy. 1 (Haziran 2006): 95-120. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.04823.
EndNote Aydın AGAO (01 Haziran 2006) AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 1 1 95–120.
IEEE A. G. A. O. Aydın, “AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 1, ss. 95–120, 2006, doi: 10.19168/jyu.04823.
ISNAD Aydın, Arş. Gör. Ali Orhan. “AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 1/1 (Haziran 2006), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.04823.
JAMA Aydın AGAO. AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2006;1:95–120.
MLA Aydın, Arş. Gör. Ali Orhan. “AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 1, 2006, ss. 95-120, doi:10.19168/jyu.04823.
Vancouver Aydın AGAO. AJAN TEMELLİ SİSTEMLER: TEORİK VE PRATİK REHBER. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2006;1(1):95-120.