İSTANBUL TİCARET ODASI TEFE GENEL ENDEKSİ ENFLASYONU VE ALT BİLEŞENLERİ ARASI İLİŞKİ: TÜRKİYE ÜZERİNE ASİMETRİK SABİT KOŞULLU KORELASYON ANALİZİ, 1968-2015

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 47, 216 - 236, 23.08.2017

Doç. Dr. Afşin Şahin , Dr. İmdat Doğan

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye İstanbul Ticaret Odası Toptan Eşya Fiyatları Endeksi (1968-2015) ve alt bileşenleri arasındaki koşullu korelasyon ilişkisi asimetrik bir model yapısı çerçevesinde analiz edilmektedir. Bulgular Türkiye’de gıda, inşaat ve döviz kurunun enflasyona etkisinin enflasyon hedeflemesi rejimine geçildiği 2006 yılı sonrasında (2006-2015), enflasyon hedeflemesi rejimi öncesine (1968-2005) göre azaldığına, petrol fiyatlarındaki değişimin etkisinin ise arttığına işaret etmektedir. Enflasyon hedeflemesi rejiminin bu anlamda geçişkenliklerin azaltılmasına katkı sağladığı söylenebilir.  

Anahtar Kelimler: Enflasyon; Para Politikası; Asimetrik Sabit Koşullu Korelasyon.

Jel Kodu: E31; E52; C58.

Relationship between the Istanbul Chamber of Wholesale General Price Index and its Components: Asymmetric Conditional Correlation Analysis on Turkey, 1968-2015.

Abstract. This study analyzes conditional correlation relationship within the framework of an asymmetric model between the Istanbul Chamber of Wholesale General Price Index and its components for the period of 1968-2015. The findings indicate that although the effects of food, construction and foreign exchange rate on the general inflation has decreased in era of inflation targeting regime (2006-2015) compared to 1968-2015 period, the effect of oil prices has increased in the same period. Overall, it can be inferred that inflation targeting regime may have served to the reduction of pass-through.

Key Words: Inflation; Monetary Policy; Asymmetric Constant Conditional Correlation.

Jel Codes: E31; E52; C58.

Kaynakça

• ARSLANER, Ferhat, KARAMAN, Doğan, ARSLANER, Nuran ve KAL, Süleyman Hilmi (2014). “The Relationship between Inflation Targeting and Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Turkey with a Model Averaging Approach”, CBRT Working Paper No. 14/16.
• BERUMENT, Hakan ve ŞAHİN, Afşin (2010). “Seasonality in Inflation Volatility: Evidence from Turkey”, Journal of Applied Economics, 13: 39-65.
• BERUMENT, Hakan, ŞAHİN, Afşin ve COŞKUN, Nejat (2007). “Day of the Week Effect on Foreign Exchange Market Volatility: Evidence from Turkey”. Research in International Business and Finance, 21: 87-97.
• BOLLERSLEV, T. (1990). “Modelling the Coherence in the Short-run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalised ARCH Model”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 72: 498-505.
• BROOKS, Chris (2014). Introductory Econometrics for Finance, 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
• CHAN, Felix, LIM, Christine ve MCALEER, Michael (2005). “Modelling Multivariate International Tourism Demand and Volatility”, Tourism Management, Vol. 26: 459-471.
• CHAN, Felix ve MCALEER, Michael (2006). “Empirical Modelling of Multivariate Asymmetric Financial Volatility”, teksir.
• CONRAD,C. Ve KARANASOS M. (2008). “Modeling Volatility Spillovers Between the Variabilities of US Inflation and Output: The UECCC GARCH Model,” University of Heidelberg Working Papers 0475.
• ENDERS, Walter (2015). Applied Econometric Time Series, Fourth Edition, Wiley Publications, USA.
• LONGIN, Francois ve SOLNİK, Bruno (1995). “Is The Correlation İn İnternational Equity Returns Constant: 1960-1990?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 14, No, 1, pp. 3-26.
• KARA, Hakan, TUĞER KÜÇÜK, Hande, ÖZLALE, Ümit, TUĞER, Burç, YAVUZ, Devrim ve YÜCEL, Eray (2005). “Exchange Rate Pass- Through in Turkey: Has it Changed and to What Extend?”, CBRT Working Paper No. 05/04.
• MENSİ, Walid, BELJİD, Makram, BOUBAKER, Adel ve MANAGİ, Shunsuke (2013). “Correlations And Volatility Spillovers Across Commodity And Stock Markets: Linking Energies, Food, And Gold”, Economic Modelling, 32, 15–22.
• NELSON, D. (1991). “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Return: A New Approach”, Econometrica, 59: 347-370.
• ÖZKAN, Harun ve YAZGAN, M. Ege (2015). “Is Forecasting Inflation Easier Under Inflation Targeting?”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 48: 609-626.
• RADUKİĆ, Snežana, MARKOVİĆ, Milan ve RADOVİĆ, Milica (2015). “The Effect of Food Prices on Inflation in the Republic of Serbia”, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2, pp. 23-36.
• SCHMITZ, Jocken ve LEDEBUR, Oliver (2011). “Approaches to Assess Higher Dimensional Price Volatiltiy Co-movements”. İçinde: (Ed.) Isabelle Piot Lepetit, Robert M. Banek, Methods to Analyze Agricultural Commodity Price Volatility, ss. 133-149.
• ŞAHİN, Afşin ve AKDİ, Yılmaz (2007). “Çiftçinin Eline Geçen Fiyatlar Endeksinin Fiyatlar Genel Düzeyi Endeksi ve Döviz Kuruyla İlişkisi”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Vol. 21, No. 252: 116-126.
• TCMB (2005). “Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Rejiminin Genel Çerçevesi ve 2006 Yılında Para ve Kur Politikası”, TCMB, Aralık, Ankara.
• TIWARI, Aviral Kumar ve SAHADUDHEEN, I. (2015). “Understanding the Nexus between Oil and Gold”, Resources Policy, 46: 85-91.
• TSE, Y.K. (2000). “A Test for Constant Correlations in a Multivariate GARCH Model”, Journal of Econometrics, 98: 107-127.
• TSUİ, Albert K. ve YU, Qiao (1999). “Constant Conditional Correlation in a Bivariate GARCH Model: Evidence from the Stock Markets of China”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 48, 503-509.
• I. Varga-Haszonitsa and I. Kondora (2007). Noise sensitivity of portfolio selection in constant conditional correlation GARCH models, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
• Volume 385, Issue 1, 1 November 2007, Pages 307–318.
• WHITE, Halbert (1980). “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity”, Econometrica, vol. 48, issue 4, pages 817-38.