Developing High School Prep Class Students’ Verbal Skils by Using Web 2.0 Application

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 4, 582 - 596

Gürbüz Ocak , Hateme Aysel Kuzu , Akın Karakuyu

https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1389295

Öz

With the importance of learning English and being able to communicate in the learned language, language education has become a considerable issue in all age groups. This important subject has become more difficult to implement with the Covid-19 pandemic. During the distance education which is applied in long period, students have experienced various problems in the lessons. In this study, it is tried to find the reasons, solutions and alternative ways of student’s unwillingness and hesitation of English speaking during their lessons. With the aim of finding these concerns an action research method, a qualitative research method, is used. 33 prep students from the high school in Bolvadin, Afyonkarahisar have attended to study. During and at the end of the applications, data were collected by teacher diaries, students diaries and semi-structured interview form. While the descriptive analysis method was used for the diaries, contents analysis was used for the interview form. At the end of the content analysis, it was found the codes and themes of focus group discussion data. As a result of data re-coding by the co-observer, the agreement was found to be 86 percent. When the applied action research data were anaylzed, it was determined that the students were embarrassed in the lessons and because of their speaking anxiety, they participated less in the activities. It has been concluded that the willingness to speak is increased with Web 2.0 applications and the lessons that include more dialogues, reading-listening activities, games and movies will be motivating for the students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

: Web 2.0 applications, reluctance to speak English, distance education.

Kaynakça

• Ağaoğlu, A. (2020). Uzaktan eğitimde oyunlaştırma uygulamalarının üniversite öğrencilerinin İngilizce derslerindeki akademik başarı ve motivasyonlarına etkisi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İnönü Üniversitesi.
• Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır? Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), 5, 368-388.
• Batıbay, E. F. (2019). Web 2.0 uygulamalarının Türkçe dersinde motivasyona ve başarıya etkisi: Kahoot örneği. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14.
• Berns, A., Palomo-Duarte, M., Dodero, J. M., & Valero-Franco, C. (2013). Using a 3D online game to assess students’ foreign language acquisition and communicative competence. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, & A. Harrer (Eds.), European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 19-31). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_3
• Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th edition). SAGE Publications.
• Çenesiz, M. & Özdemir, M. A. (2021). The effect of WEB 2.0 tools on academic success on topography and rocks in high school 10th grade geography. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 43, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.750323
• Domalewska, D. (2014). Technology-supported classroom for collaborative learning: Blogging in the foreign language classroom. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 10, 21-30.
• Efron, S.E. & Ravid, R. (2013). Action research in education a practical guide. The Guilford Press.
• Erhan, M., & Şen, Ü. S. (2019). İlköğretim 7. sınıf müzik öğretiminde teknoloji destekli materyal kullanımının akademik başarıya etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23, 2113-2139.
• Ertürk, H. (2006). İngilizce öğretiminde konuşma becerisinin kazandırılmasında yazılı-görsel öğretim materyallerinin erişiye etkisi. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Gan, Z. (2012). Understanding L2 speaking problems implications for ESL curriculum development in a teacher training institution in Hong Kong. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 43-59. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol37/iss1/3
• Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
• İnal, E. & Arslanbaş, F. (2021). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak uzaktan öğretiminde iletişim odaklı Web 2.0 araçları ve uygulama örnekleri. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, 228-249. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.850781
• Jefferson, Renée N. (2014). Action research: theory and applications. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20, 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2014.921536
• Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118, 282-292.
• Joyce, P. (2012) Action learning – a process which supports organisational change initiatives, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 9, 29-36, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2012.656888
• Karakoyun, F. (2014). Çevrimiçi ortamda oluşturulan dijital öyküleme etkinliklerine ilişkin öğretmen adayları ve ilköğretim öğrencilerinin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. [Doctoral Thesis]. Anadolu üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Kappers, W. M., & Cutler, S. L. (2015). Poll everywhere! Even in the classroom: An investigation into the impact of using polleverwhere in a large-lecture classroom. Computers in Education Journal, 6(20). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/publication/333
• Kaynar, T. (2019). Web 2.0 araçlarının yabancı dil öğretiminde kullanımı. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
• Kekeç Morkoç, D. & Erdönmez, C. (2014). Web 2.0 Uygulamalarının Eğitim Süreçlerine Etkisi: Çanakkale Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokul Örneği . AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi , 5, 25-48 . https://doi.org/10.5824/1309-1581.2014.2.002.x
• McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. I. (1996). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 403-437). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. (2. rd). SAGE Publications
• Neville, David, O. (2015): The story in the mind: the effect of 3D gameplay on the structuring of written L2 narratives, ReCALL, 27, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000160
• Noel, D., Stover, S. & McNutt, M. (2015). Student perceptions of engagement using mobilebased polling as an audience response system: Implications for leadership studies. Journal of Leadership Education, 14, 53-69.
• Ocak, G. & Akkaş Baysal, E. (2021). Eylem araştırmasını anlamak. G. Ocak (Ed.) içinde, Eğitimde eylem araştırması ve örnek araştırmalar (s.1-46). Pegem Akademi.
• Özerbaş, M. A. & Akın Mart, Ö. (2017). İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının Web 2.0 kullanımına ilişkin görüş ve kullanım düzeyleri. Ahi Evran üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 1152- 1167.
• Öztürk, G., & Gürbüz, N. (2014). Speaking anxiety among Turkish EFL learners: The case at a state university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 1-17.
• Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation, program evaluation kit. Sage Publications.
• Peeters, W. (2018): Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: a taxonomy of the online peer interaction process. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465982
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9, 1-6.
• Rose, P., & Sookraj, R. (2015). Needs Analysis: Undergraduates’ evaluation of a university-wide English language course. Carıbbean Educatıonal Research Journal, 62.
• Senemoğlu, N. (2000). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim. Gazi Kitabevi.
• Shon, H. & Smith, L. (2011). A review of Poll Everywhere audience response system. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29, 236-245.
• Strobl, C. (2014). Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing. CALICO Journal, 31, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
• Tatlı, Z. & Aksoy, D. A. (2017). Yabancı dil konuşma eğitiminde dijital öykü kullanımı. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 45, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.271060.
• Ur, P (1996). A course in language teaching, Practice and Theory. Cambridge Teacher Training and Development. Series Editors. Marion Williams and Tony Wright.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık