Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain

Öz

Aim: To investigate the frequency of anatomical variations on the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and reveal their clinical importance by distinguishing the findings that mimic sacroiliitis in patients referred to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for low back pain. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included all SIJ MRI examinations performed in our hospital with patients ≥ 18 and < 65 years of age for a period of 24 months. According to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria, data collection consisted of the patients’ age at the time of imaging, gender, and the presence of active and chronic sacroiliitis. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) was classified according to the Castellvi classification system. Moreover, all images were assessed for the presence of major sacroiliac joint variations described in the literature. Structural and edematous changes were also noted. Results: A total of 1,020 MRI examinations were included, and SIJ variations were identified in 323 of them. The frequency order of anatomical variants of SIJs are as follows: (1) LSTV (114 patients, 12.2%), (2) Accessory sacroiliac joint (80 patients, 7.8%), (3) Iliosacral complex (66 patients, 6.4%), (4) Sacral defect (61 patients, 5.9%), and (5) Isolated synostosis (2 patients, 0.2%). Structural and edematous findings were frequently observed in LSTV and accessory SIJ. Conclusion: We conclude that the lumbosacral transition segments and various anatomical SIJ variations are common in the low back pain population, especially in women. Moreover, these variations may be associated with degenerative and edematous signal intensity changes that mimic sacroiliitis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• magnetic resonance imaging
• sacroiliac joint
• anatomy
• lowback pain

Kaynakça

1. 1. Miceli-Richard C. Enthesitis: The clue to the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis?. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82(6):402-405.
2. 2. Hoffstetter P, Al Suwaidi MH, Joist A, Benditz A, Fleck M, Stroszczynski C, Dornia C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Axial Skeleton in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: Distribution Pattern of Inflammatory and Structural Lesions. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2017;29;10.
3. 3. Canella C, Schau B, Ribeiro E, Sbaffi B, Marchiori E. MRI in seronegative spondyloarthritis: imaging features and differential diagnosis in the spine and sacroiliac joints. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(1):149-157.
4. 4.M Rudwaleit, AG Jurik, KGA Hermann, R Landewe, D van der Heijde, X Baraliakos, H Marzo-Ortega, M Østergaard, J Braun, J Sieper. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68:777–783. 5. Chou D, Samartzis D, Bellabarba C, et al. Degenerative magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21 Suppl):S43-S53.
5. 6. Arnbak B, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen TS. A systematic critical review on MRI in spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(2):R55.
6. 7. Postacchini R, Trasimeni G, Ripani F. Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region. Surg Radiol Anat 2017; 39:85–94.
7. 8. Demir M, Mavi A, Gümüsburun E, Bayram M, Gürsoy S, Nishio H. Anatomical variations with joint space measurements on CT. Kobe J Med Sci. 2007;53(5):209-217.
8. 9. Ehara S, el-Khoury GY, Bergman RA (1988) The accessory sacroiliac joint: a common anatomic variant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150: 857–859.

9. 10. Prassopoulos PK, Faflia CP, Voloudaki AE, Gourtsoyiannis NC. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variants on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23(2):323-327.
10. 11. El Rafei M, Badr S, Lefebvre G, et al. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variations on MR images. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(12):5328-5337.
11. 12. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH. The Sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat 2012; 221:537–567.
12. 13. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(5):493-495.
13. 14. Campos-Correia D, Sudoł-Szopińska I, Diana Afonso P. Are we overcalling sacroiliitis on MRI? Differential diagnosis that every rheumatologist should know - Part I. Acta Reumatol Port 2019; 44(1):29-41.
14. 15. Ravikanth R, Majumdar P. Bertolotti's syndrome in low-backache population: Classification and imaging findings. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;31(2):90-95.
15. 16. Rosa Neto NS, Vitule LF, Gonçalves CR, Goldenstein-Schainberg C. An accessory sacroiliac joint. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009;38(6):496.
16. 17. Ehara S, el-Khoury GY, Bergman RA. The accessory sacroiliac joint: A common anatomic variant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150(4):857–9.
17. 18. Fortin JD, Ballard KE. The frequency of accessory sacroiliac joints. Clin Anat. 2009;22(8):876-877.
18. 19. Eno JJ, Boone CR, Bellino MJ, Bishop JA. The prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration in asymptomatic adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(11):932-936.
19. 20. Brault JS, Smith J, Currier BL. Partial lumbosacral transitional vertebra resection for contralateral facetogenic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(2):226-229.
20. 21. Quinlan JF, Duke D, Eustace S. Bertolotti's syndrome. A cause of back pain in young people. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1183-1186.
21. 22. Mahato NK. Complexity of neutral zones, lumbar stability and subsystem adaptations: probable alterations in lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) subtypes. Med Hypotheses. 2013;80(1):61-64.
22. 23. Egund N, Jurik AG. Anatomy and histology of the sacroiliac joints. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(3):332-339.
23. 24. Benz RM, Daikeler T, Mameghani AT, Tamborrini G, Studler U. Synostosis of the sacroiliac joint as a developmental variant, or ankylosis due to sacroiliitis?. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(9):2367.