Clinical Consequences of Hip Instability in Acetabular Fractures with Poor Reduction Quality

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 320 - 326, 05.01.2026

Tuncay Baran Ümit Gök , Ahmet Volkan Doğan , Mümin Karahan , Özgür Selek

https://izlik.org/JA44SJ98ZU

Öz

Aim: The treatment of the acetabular fractures is still an important topic of orthopaedic surgery because of complex anatomy of the acetabulum and serious complications. Although the reduction quality of acetabular fractures is accepted as the most important prognostic factor, the clinical outcome is not always poor in patients with poor reduction quality. The purpose of the present study is to analyze the prognostic effects of subtle hip instability on clinical results after poor reduction of acetabular fractures.
Material and Methods: A total of 31 patients were recruited to the study with poor reduction quality after acetabular fracture surgery. The clinical outcome was assessed according to modified Merle d’Aubigné hip scoring. The patients were divided into two groups as good and poor outcome. The time interval between trauma and surgery, associated hip dislocation or pelvic injury, iatrogenic nerve injury, infection, heterotophic ossification, osteoarthritis and subtle hip instability were assessed, whether these factors affected the clinical outcome or not.
Results: Twenty-six of the 31 patients were male. The mean age was 40 years and the mean follow-up period was 64 months. The mean time interval between trauma and surgery was 7.7 days. Forteen patients had isolated acetabular fractures while there were associated injuries in remaining 17 patients. Posttraumatic arthritis was the most common complication in this study. The clinical outcome was good in 11 of 31 patients and poor in remaining 20 patients. Subtle hip instability was found to negatively affect clinical outcome.
Conclusion: We showed that subtle hip instability would be a useful prognostic factor for the determination of reduction quality. Also, we suggested that subtle hip instability is a more objective method for assessment of reduction quality due to interobserver variability in classification according to Matta criteria.

Anahtar Kelimeler

acetabular fracture , reduction quality , subtle hip instability

Kaynakça

• 1. Kinik H, Armangil M. Extensile triradiate approach in the management of combined acetabular fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2004;124(7):476–82.
• 2. Jindal K, Aggarwal S, Kumar P, Kumar V. Complications in patients of acetabular fractures and the factors affecting the quality of reduction in surgically treated cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep-Oct;10(5):884–889.
• 3. Wójcicki R, Pielak T, Erdmann J, Walus P, Małkowski B, Ohla J, Łapaj Ł, Wiciński M, Zabrzyński J. The Association between Acetabulum Fractures and Subsequent Coxarthrosis in a Cohort of 77 Patients-A Retrospective Analysis of Predictors for Secondary Hip Osteoarthritis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(20):6553.
• 4. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM. Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):1559–67.
• 5. Stannard JP, Alonso JE. Controversies in acetabular fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;353:74–80.
• 6. Letournel E. The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1993;292:62–76.
• 7. Alonso JE, Davila R, Bradley E. Extended iliofemoral versus triradiate approaches in management of associated acetabular fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994;305:81–7.
• 8. Ziran N, Soles GLS, Matta JM. Outcomes after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:16.
• 9. Kilinc CY, Acan AE, Gultac E, Kilinc RM, Hapa O, Aydogan NH. Treatment results for acetabulum fractures using the modified Stoppa approach. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019;53(1):6–14.
• 10. Li XG, Tang TS, Sun JY. Results after surgical treatment of transtectal transverse acetabular fractures. Orthop Surg. 2010;2(1):7–13.
• 11. Ugino FK, Righetti CM, Alves DP, Guimarães RP, Honda EK, Ono NK. Evaluation of the reliability of the modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel Method. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(4):213–7.
• 12. Alton TB, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):35–8.
• 13. Matta JM, Tornetta P 3rd. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:129–40.
• 14. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1980;151:81–106.
• 15. Moed BR, Willson Carr SE, Watson JT. Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2002;84-A:752–8, 96. 16. Chiu FY, Chen CM, Lo WH. Surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures:72 cases followed for 10(6–14) years. Injury. 2000;31:181–5.
• 17. Giannoudis P V, Grotz MRV, Papakostidis C, Dinopulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2005;87-B:2–9.
• 18. Markus D. Schofer, Thomas Pressel, Thomas J. Hey Se, Jan Schmıtt, Ulrich Boutriot Radiological determination of the anatomic hip centre from pelvic landmarks. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:479–485, 94.
• 19. Hong-fei Shi, Jin Xiong, Yi-xin Chen Radiographic analysis of the restoration of hip joint center following open reduction and internalfixation of acetabular fractures: a retrospectivecohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:277.
• 20. Wollenman CC, Morris CA, Maxson R, Davidson C, Pennings JS, Mitchell PM. Recovery after neurologic injury in operative acetabular and pelvic fractures: Defining the natural history of foot drop. Injury. 2024;55(12):111974.
• 21. Madhu R, Kotnis R, Al-Mousawi A, et al. Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum: the time dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2006;88-B:1197–203.
• 22. Johnson EE, Matta JM, Mast JW, Letournel E. Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21–120 days following injury. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994;305:20–30.
• 23. Aktuğlu K, Özkayın N. Asetabulum kırıklarında komplikasyonların önlenmesi ve tedavisi. TOTBID Dergisi. 2012;11(2):195–200.
• 24. Cimerman M, Kristan A, Jug M, Tomaževič M. Fractures of the acetabulum: from yesterday to tomorrow. Int Orthop. 2021;45(4):1057–1064.
• 25. Sahin V, Karakas ES, Aku S, et al. Traumatic dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip: a long-term follow-up study. J Trauma. 2003;54:520–9.
• 26. Suzuki T, Smith WR, Hak DJ, Stahel PF, Baron AJ, Gillani SA, et al. Combined injuries of the pelvis and acetabulum: nature of a devastating dyad. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2010;24(5):303–8.
• 27. Bueno TSP, Godoy GP, Furukava RB, Gaggioli NT, Tamaoki MJS, Matsunaga FT, Belloti JC. Heterotopic ossification in acetabular fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis. Acta Ortop Bras. 2021 Nov-Dec;29(6):331–340.
• 28. Matta JM, Siebenrock KA. Does indomethacin reduce heterotopic bone formation after operations for acetabular fractures? A prospective randomised study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British. 1997;79(6):959–63.