Our Experiences with Batwing Mamoplasty in Centrally Placed Breast Tumors

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the batwing mammoplasty technique in centrally located breast tumors. Material and Method: This is a single-center, observational clinical trial retrospectively examining the data of 27 patients diagnosed with centrally located breast cancer and who underwent batwing mammoplasty between April 2023 and January 2025. Patients were followed up for 6 months postoperatively. Results: No postoperative death or morbidity was observed. The mean age of the patients was 56.63 ± 13.69 years. Their mean weight was 73.8 ± 12.9 kg. While 12 patients (44.4%) had no systemic disease, 9 patients (33.3%) had hypertension, 8 patients (29.6%) had diabetes, 5 patients (18.5%) had both hypertension and diabetes, and 3 patients (11.1%) had COPD and asthma. Four patients (23.6%) were premenopausal, and 13 patients (76.4%) were postmenopausal. Seven patients (26%) were premenopausal, and 20 patients (74%) were postmenopausal. Nine patients (33.3%) were smokers. The mean tumor diameter was 26 ± 8 mm. Pathology results were reported as 18 (66.7%) invasive ductal carcinoma, 2 (7.4%) invasive lobular carcinoma, 4 (14.8%) Paget's disease of the breast, 1 (3.7%) philloides tumor, and 2 (7.4%) neuroendocrine carcinoma. Tumor staging was 13 (48.1%) stage 1, 10 (37.1%) stage 2, and 4 (14.8%) stage 3. Two patients (7.4%) developed hematoma, and both patients experienced wound infection. One patient (3.7%) developed flap necrosis and underwent reoperation. Following adjuvant treatment, breast edema and cellulitis developed in two patients (7.4%). Discussion: Despite the small number of patients in this 3-year series, the batwing mammoplasty technique yielded positive results in postoperative wound healing. The ease of learning curve and application technique, along with the fact that surgical recovery times do not cause delays in adjuvant treatments, makes it a good option for centrally located breast tumors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Batwing mammoplasty
• Breast cancer
• Breast conserving surgery
• Oncoplastic surgery

Kaynakça

1. 1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures, 2022. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2022.html Accessed December 09, 2025.
2. 2. GLOBOCAN 2020 Database. https://gco.iarc.fr/ Accessed December 09, 2025.
3. 3. Bora Başara B, Soytutan Çağlar İ, Aygün A, Özdemir TA, Kulali B, Uzun SB, et al., editors. Health Statistics Yearbook, 2019 [Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı, 2019]. Ankara: Ministry of Health; 2021. Available from: https://sbsgm.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/40564/0/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019pdf.pdf Accessed December 09, 2025.
4. 4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152
5. 5. Losken A, Pinell-White X, Hart AM, Freitas AM, Carlson GW, Styblo TM. The oncoplastic reduction approach to breast conservation therapy: benefits for margin control. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(8):1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14545618
6. 6. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–1391. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y
7. 7. Hashem T, Farahad A. Batwing versus Wise pattern mammoplasty for upper pole breast tumours: a detailed comparison of cosmetic outcome. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15:60. Available from: https://www.springermedizin.de/batwing-versus-wise-pattern-mammoplasty-for-upper-pole-breast-tu/12141866
8. 8. Manie TM, Youssef MMG, Taha SN, A Rabea, AM Farahat. Batwing mammoplasty: a safe oncoplastic technique for breast conservation in breast cancer patients with gigantomastia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0129

9. 9. Rose M, Manjer J, Ringberg A, Svensson H. Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0922-4
10. 10. Monib S, Elzayat I. Evaluation of the surgical outcomes of breast oncoplastic techniques carried out by a general surgical oncologist. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19226. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19226