Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 268 - 274, 01.08.2021

Öz

Amaç: Gensini skoruna dayalı risk sınıflandırması, ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsü (NSTEMI) hastalarında erken revaskülarizasyon ihtiyacını belirlemek için önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Frontal QRS-T açısının [f(QRS-T)] koroner arter hastalığının aterosklerotik yükünü öngörmedeki prediktif rolü, NSTEMI hastalarında STEMI hastalarıyla kıyaslandığında daha belirsizdir. Bu çalışmada NSTEMI hastalarında f(QRS-T) açısı ve Gensini skoru arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmayı amaçladık.
Materyal ve metot: Çalışmaya NSTEMI tanısıyla koroner yoğun bakımda takip edilen 248 hasta dahil edildi. f(QRS-T) açısı, EKG cihazının otomatik analizine göre frontal düzlemde QRS ve T dalgalarının eksenleri arasındaki farkın mutlak değeri olarak hesaplandı. Gensini skoru, birbirinden bağımsız olarak iki kardiyolog tarafından bir Gensini skor hesaplayıcısı kullanılarak hesaplandı. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastalar düşük Gensini skorlu (≤45) ve yüksek Gensini skorlu (> 45) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı.
Bulgular: Sol ventrikül ejeksiyon fraksiyonu (LVEF) Gensini skoru yüksek olan grupta anlamlı derecede düşük saptandı (46,1±8 vs. 53,±7; p<0,001). Hastaların anjiyografik görüntüleri incelendiğinde sorumlu lezyonun en sık LAD'de (P<0.001) olduğu, revaskülarizasyon stratejileri kıyaslandığında ise en sık LAD’ye (P<0.001) yönelik revaskülarizasyon yapıldığı tespit edildi. Çalışmanın primer sonlanım noktası olan f(QRS-T) açısı, Gensini skoru yüksek olan grupta anlamlı derecede daha yüksek saptandı (54±47 vs. 84±54; p<0,001). Tek değişkenli ve çok değişkenli lojistik regresyon analizi sonucuna göre f(QRS-T) açısının yüksek Gensini skoru için bağımsız bir gösterge olduğunu tespit ettik. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analizine göre, NSTEMI hastalarında f(QRS-T) açısının 61,5° üzerinde olması, yüksek Gensini skorlu (>45) hastaları %70 sensitivite ve % 61 spesifite ile öngörmektedir (Şekil 1).
Sonuç: NSTEMI hastalarında f (QRS-T) açısının, Gensini skorunu öngörerek erken invaziv girişim ihtiyacını değerlendirmek için yararlı bir yöntem olabileceği bulunmuştur.

Kaynakça

  • 1. He C, Song Y, Wang CS, Yao Y, Tang XF, Zhao XY et al. Prognostic value of the clinical SYNTAX score on 2-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(10):1493–9.
  • 2. Gensini GG (1983). A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1983;51: 606.
  • 3. Oehler A, Feldman T, Henrikson CA, Tereshchenko LG. QRS-T angle: a review. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2014;19(6:) 534-42.
  • 4. Macfarlane PW. The frontal plane QRS-T angle. Europace. 2012;14(6):773–5.
  • 5. Lown MT, Munyombwe T, Harrison W, West RM, Hall CA, Morrell C et al. Association of frontal QRS-T angle–age risk score on admission electrocardiogram with mortality in patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:307–13.
  • 6. Bayam E, Yıldırım E, Kalcık M, Karaduman A, Kalkan S, Guner A et al, Relationship between P wave peak time and coronary artery disease severity in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Herz 2019.
  • 7. Lang, R.M., Badano LP, Avi VM, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28: 1-39
  • 8. Dogan A, Kahraman S. Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts Coronary Atherosclerotic Burden in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2019;58:155-9.
  • 9. Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Nørgaard BL, Gerdes CJ, Jensen T, Gotzsche LBH, et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST elevation acute myocardial linfarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J 2005;26: 18-26.
  • 10. Hevia JC, Antzelevitch C, Barzaga FT, Sanchez MD, Balea FD, Molina RZ, et al. T peak-T end and T peak-T end dispersion as risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1828–34.
  • 11. Zencirci AE, Zencirci E, Degirmencioglu A, Karakus G, Ugurlu-can M, Gunduz S et al. The relationship between Gensini score and ST-segment resolution in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutane-ous coronary intervention. Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(6):494-503.
  • 12. Aytemir K, Ozer N, Atalar E, Sade E, Aksöyek S, Ovünç K et al. P wave dispersion on 12-lead electrocardiography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol . 2000;23(7):1109‐12.
  • 13. Turhan H , Yetkin E, Senen K, Yilmaz MB, Ileri M, Atak R et al. Effects of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty on P-wave dispersion in patients with mitral stenosis. J Cardiol 2002;89(5):607‐9
  • 14. Okin PM. Electrocardiography in women: taking the initiative. Circulation 2006;113(4): 464‐6
  • 15. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Case D, Soliman EZ, Rautaharju PM;ARIC Research Group. Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study). Am J Cardiol 2007;100(5):844‐9.
  • 16. Gungor M, Celik M, Yalcinkaya E, Polat AT, Yuksel UC, Yildirim E et al. The value of frontal planar QRS‐T angle in patients without angiographically apparent atherosclerosis. Medical Principles and Practice 2017;26: 125–31
  • 17. Palaniswamy C, Singh T, Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kalapatapu K, Weiss MB et al. Aplanar QRS-T angle N90 degrees is associated with multivessel coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Med Sci Monit 2009;15: 31–4.
  • 18. Colluoglu T, Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Ozcan EE, Dursun H, Kaya D. The role of baseline and post-procedural frontal plane QRS-T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2018;23: e12558.
  • 19. Selvaraj S, Ilkhanoff L, Burke MA, Freed BH, Lang RM, Martinez EE et al. Association of the frontal QRS-T angle with adverse cardiac remodeling impaired left and right ventricular function, and worse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2013;27: 74-82.
  • 20. Raposeiras-Roubin S, Virgos-Lamela A, Bouzas-Cruz N, Lopez AL, Busto MC, Garda RF et al. Usefulness of the QRS-T angle to improve long-term risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1312–9.

The relationship between Electrocardiographic Frontal QRS-T angle and Gencini score in Non- ST segment elevated Myocardial İnfarction

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 268 - 274, 01.08.2021

Öz

Aim: Early risk stratification based on Gensini score plays a crucial role to identify the need for early invasive strategy in patients with NSTEMI. The predictive role of frontal QRS-T angle [f(QRS-T)] on the atherosclerotic burden of coronary artery disease is less clear in NSTEMI patients compared to STEMI patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between f(QRS-T) and Gensini score in NSTEMI patients.
Material and method: Total of 248 patients with the diagnosis of NSTEMI transferred to coronary care unit were included in the study. f(QRS-T) was calculated as the absolute value of the difference between the frontal plane QRS and T axes based on automatic report of ECG machine. Gensini score was computed using an Gensini score calculator by well-experienced two cardiologists.The study population was divided into two groups based on the low (≤45), and high Gensini score (>45).
Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in the group with high Gensini score (46.1 ± 8 vs. 53,3 ± 7; p <0.001). When the angiographic views was examined and revascularization strategies were compared, it was detected that responsible lesion was seen in LAD most frequently (p<0.001) and revascularization was performed most frequently for LAD (P <0.001). The f(QRS-T) angle, the primary endpoint of the study, were significantly higher in the group with high Gensini score ( 54±47 vs. 84±54; p<0,001). We determined that f(QRS-T) angle is an independent indicator for high Gensini score, based on the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Based on Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, finding f(QRS-T) angle higher than 61.5° in NSTEMI patients predicts patients with high Gensini score (>45) with %70 sensitivity and % 61 specificity.
Conclusion: In NSTEMI patients, f(QRS-T) has been found to be a useful decision-making tool to predict Gensini score to assess early invasive strategy.

Kaynakça

  • 1. He C, Song Y, Wang CS, Yao Y, Tang XF, Zhao XY et al. Prognostic value of the clinical SYNTAX score on 2-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(10):1493–9.
  • 2. Gensini GG (1983). A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1983;51: 606.
  • 3. Oehler A, Feldman T, Henrikson CA, Tereshchenko LG. QRS-T angle: a review. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2014;19(6:) 534-42.
  • 4. Macfarlane PW. The frontal plane QRS-T angle. Europace. 2012;14(6):773–5.
  • 5. Lown MT, Munyombwe T, Harrison W, West RM, Hall CA, Morrell C et al. Association of frontal QRS-T angle–age risk score on admission electrocardiogram with mortality in patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:307–13.
  • 6. Bayam E, Yıldırım E, Kalcık M, Karaduman A, Kalkan S, Guner A et al, Relationship between P wave peak time and coronary artery disease severity in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Herz 2019.
  • 7. Lang, R.M., Badano LP, Avi VM, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28: 1-39
  • 8. Dogan A, Kahraman S. Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts Coronary Atherosclerotic Burden in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2019;58:155-9.
  • 9. Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Nørgaard BL, Gerdes CJ, Jensen T, Gotzsche LBH, et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST elevation acute myocardial linfarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J 2005;26: 18-26.
  • 10. Hevia JC, Antzelevitch C, Barzaga FT, Sanchez MD, Balea FD, Molina RZ, et al. T peak-T end and T peak-T end dispersion as risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1828–34.
  • 11. Zencirci AE, Zencirci E, Degirmencioglu A, Karakus G, Ugurlu-can M, Gunduz S et al. The relationship between Gensini score and ST-segment resolution in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutane-ous coronary intervention. Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(6):494-503.
  • 12. Aytemir K, Ozer N, Atalar E, Sade E, Aksöyek S, Ovünç K et al. P wave dispersion on 12-lead electrocardiography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol . 2000;23(7):1109‐12.
  • 13. Turhan H , Yetkin E, Senen K, Yilmaz MB, Ileri M, Atak R et al. Effects of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty on P-wave dispersion in patients with mitral stenosis. J Cardiol 2002;89(5):607‐9
  • 14. Okin PM. Electrocardiography in women: taking the initiative. Circulation 2006;113(4): 464‐6
  • 15. Zhang ZM, Prineas RJ, Case D, Soliman EZ, Rautaharju PM;ARIC Research Group. Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study). Am J Cardiol 2007;100(5):844‐9.
  • 16. Gungor M, Celik M, Yalcinkaya E, Polat AT, Yuksel UC, Yildirim E et al. The value of frontal planar QRS‐T angle in patients without angiographically apparent atherosclerosis. Medical Principles and Practice 2017;26: 125–31
  • 17. Palaniswamy C, Singh T, Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kalapatapu K, Weiss MB et al. Aplanar QRS-T angle N90 degrees is associated with multivessel coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Med Sci Monit 2009;15: 31–4.
  • 18. Colluoglu T, Tanriverdi Z, Unal B, Ozcan EE, Dursun H, Kaya D. The role of baseline and post-procedural frontal plane QRS-T angles for cardiac risk assessment in patients with acute STEMI. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2018;23: e12558.
  • 19. Selvaraj S, Ilkhanoff L, Burke MA, Freed BH, Lang RM, Martinez EE et al. Association of the frontal QRS-T angle with adverse cardiac remodeling impaired left and right ventricular function, and worse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2013;27: 74-82.
  • 20. Raposeiras-Roubin S, Virgos-Lamela A, Bouzas-Cruz N, Lopez AL, Busto MC, Garda RF et al. Usefulness of the QRS-T angle to improve long-term risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1312–9.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Sefa Gül Bu kişi benim

Güney Erdoğan Bu kişi benim

Osman Can Yontar Bu kişi benim

Uğur Arslan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ağustos 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Gül, S., Erdoğan, G., Yontar, O. C., Arslan, U. (2021). ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, 11(2), 268-274.
AMA Gül S, Erdoğan G, Yontar OC, Arslan U. ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. Ağustos 2021;11(2):268-274.
Chicago Gül, Sefa, Güney Erdoğan, Osman Can Yontar, ve Uğur Arslan. “ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 11, sy. 2 (Ağustos 2021): 268-74.
EndNote Gül S, Erdoğan G, Yontar OC, Arslan U (01 Ağustos 2021) ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 11 2 268–274.
IEEE S. Gül, G. Erdoğan, O. C. Yontar, ve U. Arslan, “ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki”, KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG, c. 11, sy. 2, ss. 268–274, 2021.
ISNAD Gül, Sefa vd. “ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 11/2 (Ağustos 2021), 268-274.
JAMA Gül S, Erdoğan G, Yontar OC, Arslan U. ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. 2021;11:268–274.
MLA Gül, Sefa vd. “ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, c. 11, sy. 2, 2021, ss. 268-74.
Vancouver Gül S, Erdoğan G, Yontar OC, Arslan U. ST Segment Yükselmesiz Myokard İnfarktüsünde Gensini Skoru İle Elektrokardiyografik Frontal QRS-T Açısı Arasındaki İlişki. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. 2021;11(2):268-74.