Determination of Comfort Areas According to the Wind Chill Index of the Central Anatolia Region

Öz

Environmental and atmospheric conditions are very important for human life. The importance of climatic conditions is undeniably high for people to perform their daily activities comfortably. Among the climatic elements, temperature, wind, precipitation, and humidity are the main factors affecting comfort status. Climate-based indexes have been developed to determine the comfort zones of people. In this study, by using the wind chill index, one of these indices, the comfort condition of the Central Anatolia Region throughout the year was determined. For this purpose, the temperature and wind speed values of the Central Anatolia Region were used for the Windchill index. In July and August, the wind speed increased in places in Salt Lake and its surroundings and the east of the region. It is seen that the temperature values in the region fall below 0°C in winter. Apart from this, temperature values in the region are above 0°C in summer, spring, and autumn seasons. Depending on the temperature and wind speed values, in April, May, June, September, and October in the Central Anatolia Region, areas in the "no risk" and "zero" category have been identified in the entire region according to the Windchill index. Especially in the whole winter season (December, January, February, and in the first month of spring in March), especially in the south and east of the region, some areas fall into the "low risk" and "medium risk" category. and they must wear thick clothing, otherwise, hypothermia and subsequent frostbite deaths may occur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Central Anatolia Region
• Wind Chill
• Bioclimatik Comfort
• Temparature
• wind

Kaynakça

1. [1] Toy, S. and Yılmaz, S. (2009). Peyzaj Tasarımında Biyoklimatik Konfor ve Yaşam Mekanları için Önemi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40 (1), 133-139.
2. [2] Adiguzel, F., Cetin, M., Kaya, E. Simsek M., Gungor S., Bozdogan Sert E (2020) Defining suitable areas for bioclimatic comfort for landscape planning and landscape management in Hatay, Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology (Theor Appl Climatol) (2020) 139(3): 1493-1503 doi:10.1007/s00704-019-03065-7, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00704-019-03065-7
3. [3] Cetin, M. (2020) Climate comfort depending on different altitudes and land use in the urban areas in Kahramanmaras City. Air Qual Atmos Health 13, 991–999 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00858-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-020-00858-y
4. [4] Cetin, M., Sevik, H. & Cobanoglu, O. (2020) Ca, Cu, and Li in washed and unwashed specimens of needles, bark, and branches of the blue spruce (Picea pungens) in the city of Ankara. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08687-3; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08687-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-08687-3
5. [5] Bozdogan Sert E, Turkmen M, Cetin M (2019) Heavy metal accumulation in rosemary leaves and stems exposed to traffic-related pollution near Adana-İskenderun Highway (Hatay, Turkey), Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191:553, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7714-7, https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-019-7714-7
6. [6] Cetin M., Cobanoglu O. (2019) The Possibilities of Using Blue Spruce (Picea pungens Engelm) as a Biomonitor by Measuring the Recent Accumulation of Mn in Its Leaves. Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Science. 5(1): 43-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/745562
7. [7] Altera A.Z.A., Bayraktar O.Y., Cetin M. (2019) Advanced Road Materials in Highway Infrastructure and Features. Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Science. 5(1): 36-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/745527
8. [8] Cetin Mehmet (2017). Change in Amount of Chlorophyll in Some Interior Ornamental Plants (Bazı İç Mekan Süs Bitkilerinde Klorofil Miktarının Değişimi) Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences 3(1):11-19, 2017. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/issue-file/5600

9. [9] Sandal, E., & Adiguzel, F. (2014). Spatial development of Tarsus and the changes in land use. Urban and Urbanization, 1, 570-579.
10. [10] Alkan, A., Adıgüzel, F., & Kaya, E. (2017). Batman Kentinde Kentsel Isınmanın Azaltılmasında Yeşil Alanların Önemi. Coğrafya Dergisi, (34), 62-76.
11. [11] Sancar, M. C., & Güngör, Ş. (2020). A Review of Bioclimatic Comfort Areas Determined by the New Summer Index in Terms of Tourism in Antalya. Acta Biologica Turcica, 33(1), 53-63.
12. [12]Cetin M., Zeren I., Sevik H., Cakir C., Akpinar H. (2018). A study on the determination of the natural park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 190(3): 167.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6534-5
13. [13] Cetin, M.; Sevik H. (2016). Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(1):52, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10661-015-5064-7
14. [14] Kestane, Ö. and Ülgen, K. (2013). İzmir İli İçin Biyoklimatik konfor Bölgelerinin belirlenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Teknik Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (5), 18-25.
15. [15] Cetin, M.; Sevik, H. (2016). Assessing Potential Areas of Ecotourism through a Case Study in Ilgaz Mountain National Park, InTech, Chapter 5, Eds:Leszek Butowski, 190, ISBN:978-953-51-2281-4, 81-110, http://www.intechopen.com/books/tourism-from-empirical-research-towards-practical-application/assessing-potential-areas-of-ecotourism-through-a-case-study-in-ilgaz-mountain-national-park
16. [16] Zeren Cetin I, Ozel HB, Varol T (2020) Integrating of settlement area in urban and forest area of Bartin with climatic condition decision for managements. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(8), 1013-1022.. https://do.org/10.1007/s11869-020- 00871-1
17. [17] Zeren Cetin, I. & Sevik, H. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between bioclimatic comfort and land use by using GIS and RS techniques in Trabzon. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(2), 71.
18. [18] Zeren Çetin, İ. (2019). Trabzon ekoturizm potansiyelinin GIS kullanımı ile biyoklimatik konfor açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Ensitüsü. Kastamonu.
19. [19] Cetin, M. (2015). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(6), 490-495
20. [20] Cetin, M. (2016). Determination of bioclimatic comfort areas in landscape planning: A case study of Cide Coastline, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 4 (9), 800-804
21. [21] Toy, S., Yılmaz, S. and Yılmaz, H. (2007). Determination of bioclimatic comfort in three different land uses in the city of Erzurum, Turkey, Building and Environment, 42, 1315-1318.
22. [22] Cetin, M., Adiguzel, F., Gungor, S., Kaya, E. and Sancar, M. C. (2019). Evaluation of thermal climatic region areas in terms of building density in urban management and planning for Burdur, Turkey. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 12(9): 1103-1112. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-019-00727-3
23. [23] Çetin, M., Güngör, Ş., & Adıgüzel, F. (2020). Bulanık Mantık Ve Cbs İle Kentsel Dokudaki Bozulma Miktarını Ölçmek İçin Mekânsal Model Geliştirme. Ş. Güngör, & F. Adıgüzel içinde, Kapadokya Araştırmaları İnsan Ve Mekân (s. 55). Nevşehir: Literatürk Academia.
24. [24] Cetin, M. (2015). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(10), 640, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10661-015-4861-3
25. [25] Kaya, E., Agca, M., Adiguzel F., Cetin, M. (2019). Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 25 (6): 1521-1530. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896
26. [26] Cetin M., Adiguzel F., Kaya O., & Sahap, A. (2018) Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environment, Development and Sustainability, (2018) 20 (1): 361-375.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9885-5
27. [27] Cetin M, Sevik H, Canturk U, Cakir C (2018) Evaluation of the recreational potential of Kutahya Urban Forest. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(5):2629-2634.
28. [28] Güngör, S., Cetin, M. & Adiguzel, F. (2020) Calculation of comfortable thermal conditions for Mersin urban city planning in Turkey. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health (Air Qual Atmos Health ) (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s11869-020-00955-y; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00955-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-020-00955-y
29. [29] Güngör, Ş., & Adıgüzel, F. (2019). Kentsel Yeşil Alanlar İçin Mekânsal Yeterlilik Ve ulaşabilirlik Analizi: Nevşehir Örneği. A. Uysal, & H. İçen içinde, Kapadokya Araştırmaları (s. 90). Nevşehir: Pegem Akademi.
30. [30] Cetin, M. (2015). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 420-424, DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066
31. [31] Deniz, A , Güngör, Ş . (2020). Mapping With Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Systems: A Case Study Of Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University Campus . Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences , 6 (1) , 27-32
32. [32] Cetin M (2019). The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area's effect using satellitia imagines on air quality: a case study of Bursa city. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, (Air Qual Atmos Health). 12(10):1237-1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00742-4 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-019-00742-4
33. [33] Sandal, E , Adıgüzel, F , Karademi̇r, N . (2020). Changes In Land Use Between The Years Of 1990-2018 In Mersin Province Based On CORINE (Coordination Of Information On The Environment) System . Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences , 6 (1) , 8-18.
34. [34] Baloğlu, M. (2001). Hissedilen ve üşüme sıcaklıklarının Türkiye üzerindeki dağılımı, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, basılmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul.
35. [35] Osczevski, R. J. (1995). The Basis of windchill, Arctic, 48, 372-382.
36. [36] Toros, H., Deniz, A., Şaylan, L., Şen, O. and Baloğlu, M. (2003). Marmara bölgesi için üşüme sıcaklığı analizi, III. Atmosfer Bilimleri Sempozyumu, 19-21 Mart, İTÜ, İstanbul.
37. [37] Keimig, F.T. and Bradley, R. (2002). Recent changes in wind chill temperatures at high latitudes in North America, Geophysical Research Letters, 29 (8).
38. [38] Shitzer, A. and De Dear, R. (2006). Inconsistencies in the “New” Windchill Chart at low wind speeds, Journal of Applied meteorology and climatology, 45, 787-790.
39. [39] Acar Deniz, Z. and Uslan, E. (2018). Ekstrem soğuk hava dalgası: Ocak 2017, Gaziantep Universty Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 761-773.
40. [40] Vural E. (2020). Investigation of Experienced Air Pollution on Selected Pollutants Scale in Kırıkkale City (2018-2019), Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences, 6(1), 41-50.