Evaluation of Prusias ad Hypium (Konuralp) Ancient City as Archaeological Park
Öz
Abstract
Aim of study: The main aim of the research is the formation of an environment revealing and protecting the historical and cultural values of Konuralp Archeological Site; and dealing within the framework of the main idea of “archeological park” which is the method of protection and refunctioning of the area and historical environment enlivenment method; and putting forward an integrated approach evaluated as far as social, cultural and trading aspects are concerned.
Area of study: This study was conducted at Konuralp Archeological Site and its environs situated at Konuralp District of Düzce province in the West Black Sea Region of Turkey.
Material and Methods: The method of the research had three stages, literature survey and data collection, site analysis studies in Prusias ad Hypium (Konuralp) archeological site at macro and micro scales studies phases.
Main results: An archeological park landscape design project has been proposed to emphasize the importance of Konuralp Ancient City (Prusias ad Hypium) and to protect and re-functioning of cultural heritage in a healthy, livable and aesthetic environment. During the project preparation, the targets have been determined for any type of physical-spatial arrangements based on the qualification of archeological site, and the necessities determined in the research area were considered and it was aimed that historical environment quality will be improved by environmentally compatible designs.
Research highlights: In this paper, “archeological park” concept was scrutinized as a cultural heritage protection method for sustainable development, and application of this model in Konuralp Ancient city was offered.
Keywords: Archaeology, Archaeological park, Landscape design, Prusias ad Hypium, Konuralp
Anahtar Kelimeler
Archaeology,Archaeological park,Landscape design,Prusias ad Hypium,Konuralp
Kaynakça
- Ferrero, B. 1970. Teatri Classici in Asia Minore 3. Citta dalla Troade alla Pamfilia, Roms, Fritz, F. 1965. Codex Kultur ATLAS, Turkei 5. Grundholzen
- Salinas C, E. Osorio, J. A., 2006. Turismo y Sustentabilidad: de la Teoría a la práctica en Cuba. Cuadernos de Turismo. Universidad de La Habana-Universidad de Murcia, N° 17, pp. 201-221.
- Puren, K., Drewes, E. and Roos, V. 2006 An Exploration of Sense of Place as Informative for Spatial Planning Guidelines: A Case Study of the Vredefort Dome World Heritage Site, South Africa, International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, vol.1, no.3: 190-197,
- Nigro, F. 2002. Cultural Heritage Planning and Management for Development:The Palestinian Archaeological Park of the Jericho Oasis, Rome , 191-208
- Nikolic, E., Rogic, D., Anđelković Grašar, J. 2010. “Archaeological Park As a Product Of Emotional Design: Design And Organization Of A Park Based On The Exploration Of Visitors’ Emotions”, Archaeology and Science 6, Center for New Technology Archaeological Institute Belgrade p:259-269
- Norberg-Schulz, C. 1980 Genius Loci – Towards A Phenomenology of Architecture, New York: Rizzoli.
- Özlü, Z. 2009. Batı Karadeniz’de Antik Bir Osmanlı Kenti Prusias ad Hypium Üskübü (Konuralp), Düzce Üniversitesi Araştırma Yayınları, No:1, 467s.
- Zeyrek, T., Çelik, G. 2005. Prusias ad Hypium (Kieros) Anadolu’nun Kuzeybatısında Antik Bir Kent (Konuralp/Üskübü), Ege Yayınları, İstanbul, 126s
- Tuna, A. (2014) . Sürdürülebilir Antik Knetler Kapsamında Arkeolojik Parklar: Düzce Konuralp Örneği, Ankara Univesitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, Doktora Tezi