NURSI’S CALL TO HIS RHETORICAL AUDIENCE IN DAMASCUS SERMON

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 7, 173 - 206, 28.06.2019

Nur Sakinah Thomas

Öz

The
notion to consider audience in rhetorical situation has been an important
concern ever since the ancient times. However, little attention is given to the
significance on the projection of audience by an orator and the role of an
audience in rhetorical analysis. Therefore, this study aims to identify the
projection of audience through a rhetorical analysis in Damascus Sermon written by Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1877-1960).
Specifically, the analysis focuses on Nursi’s call to his rhetorical audience
to be mediators of change. The Sermon
is analysed using a qualitative research method through an explanatory case
study based on Bitzer’s (1968, 1980) rhetorical situation theory. The findings
reveal that Nursi’s call for ‘positive action’ to his present and envisioned
rhetorical audience is embedded in the solution he provides in the form of six
‘Words’ to cure the “six dire sicknesses" of Muslims in particular. Although
there are limitations in this study as it only focuses on the audience, the
findings are worth considering as audience play an important role through their
actions which are crucial for positive modification in any rhetorical
situations. The implications from the study can benefit audience, create
orators’ awareness and contribute to the field of rhetorical studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bediuzzaman Said Nursi, Damascus Sermon, rhetorical audience

NURSI’S CALL TO HIS RHETORICAL AUDIENCE IN DAMASCUS SERMON

Öz

The notion to consider audience in rhetorical situation has been an important concern ever since the ancient times. However, little attention is given to the significance on the projection of audience by an orator and the role of an audience in rhetorical analysis. Therefore, this study aims to identify the projection of audience through a rhetorical analysis in Damascus Sermon written by Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1877-1960). Specifically, the analysis focuses on Nursi’s call to his rhetorical audience to be mediators of change.The Sermon is analysed using a qualitative research method through an explanatory case study based on Bitzer’s (1968, 1980) rhetorical situation theory. The findings reveal that Nursi’s call for ‘positive action’ to his present and envisioned rhetorical audience is embedded in the solution he provides in the form of six ‘Words’ to cure the “six dire sicknesses" of Muslims in particular. Although there are limitations in this study as it only focuses on the audience, the findings are worth considering as audience play an important role through their actions which are crucial for positive modification in any rhetorical situations. The implications from the study can benefit audience, create orators’ awareness and contribute to the field of rhetorical studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bediuzzaman Said Nursi, Damascus Sermon, Rhetorical Audience

Kaynakça

• Abu-Rabi’, I. M. (2008a). Spiritual Dimensions of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi’s Risale-I Nur. Suny Press.
• Abu-Rabi’, I. M. (2008b). The Blackwell Companion to Contemporary Islamic Thought. John Wiley & Sons.
• Aquinas, T. (2002). The treatise on human nature: Summa theologica (R.Pasnam, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
• Basar, A. (1995). A Lifelong Principle: Positive Action. International Bediüzzaman Symposium Papers in Turkey (English).
• Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric. In J. Luraites, C. Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary Rhetorical Theory (pp. 217–225). New Jersey, USA: Guilford Press.
• Bitzer, L. F. (1980). Functional communication: A situational perspective. In E.E.White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition: Studies in the nature and use of rhetoric (pp. 21–38). PA: Pensylvanian State: University Press.
• Bitzer, L. F. (1995). The Rhetorical Situation. In C. Burgchardt (Ed.), Readings in rhetorical criticism (pp. 58–67). New York: Strata Publishing.
• Cacioppo, J., Gardner, W., & Berntson, G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (76), 839–855.
• Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press.
• Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, (97), 19–35.
• Clore, G. (1994). Why emotions are felt. In: Ekman P, Davidson R, editors. The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Crowley, S., & Hawhee, D. (2004). Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students. New York: Pearson/Longman.
• Davidson, R. (1993). The neuropsychology of emotion and affective style. ( editors. G. P. N. Y. In: Lewis M, Haviland JM, Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
• Earle, E. R. (2014). Paul Tillich’s Communication Theology and the Rhetoric of Existentialism. Louisiana State University.
• Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 101, 164–184.
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The Royal Society.
• Keith, W. M., & Lundberg, C. O. (2008). The Essential Guide to Rhetoric. Bedford: St. Martin’s.
• Kinneavy, J. . (1971). A theory of Discourse. New York: W.W.Norton & Company.
• Kitayama, S., Snibbe, A. C., Markus, H. R., & Suzuki, T. (2004). Is there any “free” choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures. Psychol. Sci, 15, 527–533.
• Lopez, S. J. (2011). The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology. New Jersey, USA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
• Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The How of Happiness: A New Approach to Getting the Life You Want (Reprint ed). UK: Penguin Books.
• Metz, S. M. (2005). Dr. Martin Luther King , Jr. and MalcolmX: The Power and Legacy of Prophetic Discourse in the Civil Rights Movement. University of Tennessee Knoxville.
• Michel, T. (2005). Said Nursi’s Views On Muslim-Christian Understanding. Istanbul, Turkey: Soz Publication.
• Noe, J. R. (2006). Peak Performance Principles for High Achievers. United States of America: Frederick Fell Publisher.
• Nursi, B. S. (2006). The Kastamonu Letter (Turkish Kastamonu Lahikasi) (Original work published 1936-1943). Istanbul, Turkey: Soz Basin Yagin.
• Nursi, B. S. (2008a). The reasoning (Turkish Muhakemat, Huseyin Akarsu, Trans) (Original work published 1913). New Jersey, USA: Tugra Books.
• Nursi, B. S. (2008b). The Words (Turkish Sozler, Sukran Vahide, Trans). Istanbul, Turkey: Sozler Nesriyat Tic.ve San.A.S.
• Nursi, B. S. (2010). The Letters (Turkish Mektubat, Sukran Vahide, Trans). Istanbul, Turkey: Sozler Nesriyat Tic.ve San.A.S.
• Nursi, B. S. (2011a). Emirdag Lahikasi II. Istanbul, Turkey: RNK Nesriyat.
• Nursi, B. S. (2011b). The Flashes (Turkish Lem’alar, Sukran Vahide, Trans). Istanbul, Turkey: Sozler Nesriyat Tic.ve San.A.S.
• Nursi, B. S. (2011c). Uhuvvet Risalesi. Istanbul, Turkey: Sözler Neşriyat.
• Nursi, B. S. (2012). The Damascus Sermon From the Risale i Nur Collection Trans (Turkish “Hutbe-i Şâmiye”, Şükran Vahide,Trans) (Second (re). Istanbul, Turkey: Sözler Neşriyat A.Ş. Istanbul. (Original work published 1911).
• Nursi, B. S. (2013a). Lem’alar. RNK Neşriyat.
• Nursi, B. S. (2013b). Tarihçe-i Hayatı, 11. Istanbul, Turkey: RNK Neşriyat.
• Nursi, B. S. (2014). The Emirdag Letters (Turkish Emirdag Lahikasi). Istanbul, Turkey: Işık Yayıncılık Ticaret.
• Nursi, B. S. (2015a). Denizli ve Emirdağ Lâhikaları, (Mektup sırası 26). Retrieved from nur.gen.tr,
• Nursi, B. S. (2015b). Short Words Risale-i Nur Collection (Sukran Vahide, trans). Istanbul, Turkey: Risale Press.
• O’Hara, D. (2013). Hope in Counseling and Psychotherapy. University of Abertay, Dundee: SAGE.
• Oishi, S. (2012). The Psychological Wealth of Nations: Do Happy People Make a Happy Society? USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., Miao, F. F., Talhelm, T., Endo, Y., & Uchida, Y. (2013). Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network: but why? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol, 49, 217–223.
• Park, L. E., & Crocker, J. (2005). Interpersonal consequences of seeking self-esteem. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull, 31, 1587–1598.
• Rothwell, J. D. (2010). In the Company of Others, An Introduction to Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Saritoprak, Z. (2010). Bediüzzaman Said Nursi’s paradigm of Islamic nonviolence. In Q. Huda (Ed.), Crescent and Dove Peace and Conflict Resolution in Islam (pp. 95–106). Washington, D.C United States: Institute of Peace Press.
• Sayilgan, M. S. (2012). Constructing an Islamic Ethics of Non-Violence: The Case of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. University of Alberta, Canada.
• Schug, J., Yuki, M., Horikawa, H., & Takemura, K. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: how cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the United States. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95–103.
• Snyder, C. R. (2000). There is Hope. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of Hope Theory, Measures and Applications (pp. 3–21). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., & Sigmon, S. T. (1991). The Will and the Ways: Development and Validation of an Individual-Differences Measure of Hope. . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.
• Snyder, C. R., Sympson, S. C., Ybasco, F. C., Borders, T. F., Babyak, M. A., & Higgins, R. L. (1996). Development and Validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321–335.
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. USA: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
• Vahide, S. (2008). A Survey of the main spiritual themes of the Risale-i Nur. In I. M.Sbu-Rabi (Ed.), Spiritual Dimensions of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi’s Risale-I Nur. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Vahide, Ş. (2012). Islam in Modern Turkey: An Intellectual Biography of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. (I. M. A. Rabi’, Ed.). Suny Press.
• Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (76), 820–838.
• Watson., D. (1988). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: The relation to health complains,perceived stress and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (54), 1020–1030.
• Watson.D, Clark, L., Mc Intryro, C. ., & Hamaker, S. (1992). Affect. Personality and social activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1011–1025.
• Willhite, R. K. (1990). Audience relevance and rhetorical argumentation in expository preaching: A historical-critical comparative analysis of selected sermons of John F. MacArthur, Jr. and Charles R. Swindoll,1970-1990. Purdue University.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.