LIVING LABS EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY: EXAMPLES OF BAŞAKŞEHİR AND BODRUM

Yıl 2023, , 320 - 341, 26.06.2023

Abidin Kemeç

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2023.013

Öz

Living Labs finds the ability to find solutions to problems that arise in cities, to implement original projects and to test existing projects. At the same time, financing, entrepreneurship and design support are provided to the project owners who are entitled to be supported in the life labs. In living labs, a network is organized in which citizens, local, national, international and global companies, non-governmental organizations, local and central governments, think tanks work in cooperation. The main purpose of the study is to provide a conceptual reflection on living labs and to evaluate its role in strengthening governance. Bodrum and Başakşehir Living Labs were chosen as the sample. The aims of the establishment of these two members, the strategic areas they have determined, the projects they have realized or planned, the events and competitions, and the collaborations they have established have been examined.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Living labs, Başakşehir Living Labs, Bodrum Living Labs

LIVING LABS EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY: EXAMPLES OF BAŞAKŞEHİR AND BODRUM

Öz

Yaşam laboratuvarları, kentlerde ortaya çıkan sorunlara çözüm bulma, özgün projeleri hayata geçirme ve mevcut projeleri test etme becerisine sahiptir. Aynı zamanda yaşam laboratuvarlarında destek almaya hak kazanan proje sahiplerine finansman, girişimcilik ve tasarım desteği sağlanmaktadır. Yaşam laboratuvarında vatandaşlar, yerel, ulusal, uluslararası ve küresel şirketlerin, sivil toplum kuruluşlarının, yerel ve merkezi yönetimlerin, düşünce kuruluşlarının işbirliği içinde çalıştığı bir ağ düzenlenir. Çalışmanın temel amacı, yaşam laboratuvarlarının kavramsal bir yansıma sağlamak ve yönetişimin güçlendirilmesindeki rolünü değerlendirmektir. Bodrum ve Başakşehir Yaşam Laboratuvarları örneklem olarak seçilmiştir. Bu iki aktif üyenin kuruluş amaçları, belirledikleri stratejik alanlar, gerçekleştirdikleri veya planladıkları projeler, etkinlikler ve yarışmalar ile kurdukları işbirlikleri incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yaşam Laboratuvarları, Başakşehir Yaşam Laboratuvarları, Bodrum Yaşam Laboratuvarları

Kaynakça

• Akasaka, F.,& Nakatani, M. (2021). Citizen involvement in service co-creation in urban living labs. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 4374).
• Anton, C., Micu, A. E., & Rusu, E. (2022). Introducing the living lab approach in the coastal area of Constanta (Romania) by using design thinking. Inventions, 7(1), 19.
• Antonova, A.,& Todorova, K. (2011). Living labs in e-learning, e-learning in living labs and living labs for e-learning. In Third International Conference on Software, Services and Semantic Technologies S3T 2011 (pp. 147-154). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Åström, J., Ruoppila, S., Ertiö, T., Karlsson, M., & Thiel, S. K. (2015, September). Potentials and challenges of a living lab approach in research on mobile participation. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 795-800).
• Babaoğlu, C.,& Memiş, L. (2019). Living labs as a policymaking tool of smart cities. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 28(4), 23-47.
• Ballon, P. and Schuurman, D. (2015), "Living labs: concepts, tools and cases", info, Vol. 17 No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-04-2015-0024.
• Başakşehir Belediyesi, (2022). General characteristics of Başakşehir District,https://www.basaksehir.bel.tr/belediye-tarihcesi, Date of access: 05.06.2022.
• Başakşehir Living Labs. (2022). Purpose of establishment. https://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/hakkimizda/living-lab-nedir/, Date of access: 24.04.2022.
• Başakşehir Living Labs. (2022a). Başakşehir living labs activities carried out.https://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/gecmis-etkinlikler/, Date of access: 12.05.2022.
• Başakşehir Living Labs. (2022b). Support for entrepreneurs.https://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/hakkimizda/, Date of access: 17.05.2022.
• Başakşehir Living Labs. (2022c). Başakşehir living labsactivities. https://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/projeler/, Date of access: 22.05.2022.
• Başakşehir Living Labs. (2022d). Başakşehir living labs strategic areas. https://basaksehir-livinglab.com/BLL/hakkimizda/living-lab-nedir/, Date of access: 08.06.2022.
• Baydar, M. L., Gül, H., & Akçil, A. (2009). Basic principles of scientific research. Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 3rd Edition, Isparta, Turkey.
• Bilandzic, A., Foth, M., & Hearn, G. (2019). The role of fab labs and living labs for economic development of regional australia. In Regional Cultures, Economies, and Creativity (pp. 174-197). Routledge
• Boronowsky, M., Herzog, O., Knackfuss, P., & Lawo, M. (2006). Wearable computing and living labs–synergy at work. Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies.
• Bodrum Belediyesi, (2022). Bodrum Municipality history, https://bodrum.bel.tr/page.php?id=19/bodrum_tarihi, Date of access: 25.05.2022.
• Bodrum Living Labs. (2022). The purpose of establishment of Bodrum Living Labs. https://bodrumlivinglab.com/boll-hakkinda/, Date of access: 27.04.2022.
• Bodrum Living Labs, (2022a). Bodrum living lab working space, https://bodrumlivinglab.com/galeri/ Date of access: 12.05.2022.
• Bodrum Living Labs. (2022b). Project of Bodrum Living Labs.https://bodrumlivinglab.com/projeler/, Date of access: 12.05.2022.
• Bodrum Living Labs. (2022c). Bodrum living labs strategic areas. https://bodrumlivinglab.com/faaliyet-alanlarimiz/, Date of access:08.06.2022.
• BOTAV, (2022). An image of Bodrum district, https://botav.org.tr/, Date of access:10.06.2022.
• Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F., Coelho, J., & Duarte, C. (2021). Living labs and user engagement for innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 12572h1.
• Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., ... & Palgan, Y. V. (2016). Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13-17.
• Cleland, B., Mulvenna, M., Galbraith, B., Wallace, J., & Martin, S. (2012, June). Building sustainable eparticipation strategies using Living Labs. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on e-Government 2012 (pp. 149-158).
• Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F., Coelho, J., & Duarte, C. (2021). Living labs and user engagement for innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125721.
• Creswell, J. W.,& Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Dias, A.,& Salmelin, B. (2018). Living labs and open ınnovation in european context. In Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies (pp. 7-18). Springer, Cham.
• ENoLL, (2022). About the European Network of Living Laboratories. https://enoll.org/about-us/ . Erişim Tarihi 12.02. 2022.
• Favela, J., Kaye, J., Skubic, M., Rantz, M., & Tentori, M. (2015). Living labs for pervasive healthcare research. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 14(2), 86-89.
• Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., &Røhnebæk, M. T. (2021). Living labs for public sector innovation: an integrative literature review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 58.
• Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98.
• Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of cleaner production, 213, 976-988.
• Hronszky, I.,& Kovács, K. (2013). Interactive value production through living labs. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 10(2), 89-108.
• Leminen, S., Nyström, A. G., & Westerlund, M. (2020). Change processes in open innovation networks–Exploring living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 91, 701-718.
• Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6-11.
• Memiş, L.,& Bayraktar, H. K. (2020). Smart cities and living labs: an investigation on the sample of Başakşehır Living Lab. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Journal, 16(4), 954-975.
• Mirijamdotter, A., Ståhlbröst, A., Sällström, A., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2006). The European Network of Living Labs for CWE-user-centric co-creation and innovation. Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
• Quak, H., Lindholm, M., Tavasszy, L., & Browne, M. (2016). From freight partnerships to city logistics living labs–Giving meaning to the elusive concept of living labs. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 461-473.
• Quarto, A., Di Lecce, F., Giove, A., Soldo, D., & Di Lecce, V. (2014, September). Environmental monitoring via Living Labs approach. In 2014 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems Proceedings (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
• Paskaleva, K.,& Cooper, I. (2021). Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence. Technovation, 106, 102311.
• Pigot, H.,& Giroux, S. (2015). Living labs for designing assistive technologies. In 2015 17th International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom) (pp. 170-176). IEEE.
• Puerari, E., De Koning, J. I., Von Wirth, T., Karré, P. M., Mulder, I. J., & Loorbach, D. A. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893.
• Sahakian, M., Rau, H., Grealis, E., Godin, L., Wallenborn, G., Backhaus, J., ... & Fahy, F. (2021). Challenging social norms to recraft practices: A Living Lab approach to reducing household energy use in eight European countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101881.
• Savasmoving.com, (2022). An image of Başakşehir district, https://savasmoving.com/basaksehir/, Date of access: 10.06.2022.
• Savelkoul, L.,& Peutz, M. (2017). Needsfinding in living labs: A structured research approach. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2).
• Schuurman, D., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2013). Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: insights from the LeYLab. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11).
• Steen, K.,& van Bueren, E. 2017. The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(7): 21-33. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088.
• Tanda, A.,& De Marco, A. (2021). A Review of an urban living lab Initiative. Review of Policy Research, 38(3), 370-390.
• thinkwithturkiye.com, (2018). Başakşehir living lab working space, https://www.thinkwithturkiye.com/basaksehir-living-lab-teknoloji-inovasyon-merkezi/, Date of access: 12.05.2022.
• Toksarı, M., Mürütsoy M. ve Bayraktar, M. (2014). The role of social media in factors affecting consumer perception: Nigde University I.I.B.F. Instance. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(4), 1-28.
• Trapani, F. (2016). Palermo: Living labs for urban regeneration. In human smart cities (pp. 229-237). Springer, Cham.
• TUİK, (2021). 31 Aralık 2021 dated address based population registration system results, Ankara.
• van Timmeren, A. (2022). Urban living labs,https://www.ams-institute.org/how-we-work/living-labs/Date of access: 31.05.2022.
• Wehrmann, C.,& van der Sanden, M. (2017). Universities as living labs for science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 16(5), C03.
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.