KIRSAL VE KENTSEL BÖLGELER ARASINDA TEKNOLOJİK BÖLÜNMENİN FİNANSAL VE BEŞERÎ SERMAYE ÜZERİNDEKİ ROLÜ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 32, 958 - 987, 30.12.2025

Resul Telli , İlhan Alemdar

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2025.035

Öz

Teknolojik yeniliklerin şekillendirdiği günümüzde dijitalleşme, ülke ekonomilerini farklı dinamikler üzerinden etkileyen önemli bir unsur haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, Dijital Bölünme Teorisi çerçevesinde 2011-2023 döneminde Türkiye’nin 12 bölgesinde teknolojik bölünmenin finansal ve beşerî sermaye üzerindeki etkilerini, toplam faktör verimliliği (TFV) değişimleri üzerinden incelemektedir. Malmquist Endeksi kullanılarak yapılan analizde, Batı Marmara, Akdeniz, Batı ve Doğu Karadeniz bölgeleri teknik etkinlikte; İstanbul ve Ege bölgeleri ise teknolojik etkinlikte öne çıkmıştır. İstanbul, Ege ve Akdeniz bölgeleri TFV artışında en verimli bölgeler olarak belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, mevduat dağılımı, eğitim düzeyi ve Ar-Ge insan kaynağının verimlilik üzerinde olumlu etkiler yarattığını; ancak gelir eşitsizliği ve Ar-Ge harcamalarının etkisinin beklenenden düşük kaldığını göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, Ar-Ge kaynaklarının etkin kullanımı, âtıl girdilerin azaltılması ve teknolojik dönüşümün teşviki sürdürülebilir kalkınma için temel stratejilerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknolojik bölünme , finansal sermaye , beşerî sermaye , verimlilik

THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGICAL DIVIDE BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS ON FINANCIAL AND HUMAN CAPITAL

Öz

Technological innovations are reshaping today’s world, and digitalization has become a key driver influencing national economies. This study investigates the determinants of total factor productivity (TFP) changes across 12 Turkish regions from 2011 to 2023 within the framework of Digital Divide Theory. Employing the Malmquist Index, it assesses the impact of technological disparities on financial and human capital. Results show that the West Marmara, Mediterranean, and Black Sea regions demonstrated high technical efficiency, while Istanbul and the Aegean regions led in technological progress and TFP growth. Deposit distribution, education levels, and R&D human resources positively affected productivity in developed regions. However, income inequality and R&D expenditure had weaker effects than expected, indicating that these factors alone cannot explain regional TFP gaps. The study highlights efficient R&D use, reduced input waste, and technological transformation as vital for sustainable regional development in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technological divide , financial capital , human capital , productivity

Kaynakça

• Ansong, D., Chowa, G., & Adjabeng, B. K. (2015). Spatial analysis of the distribution and determinants of bank branch presence in Ghana. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(3), 201–222.
• Assadi, M. (2024). Digital poverty as a new form of inequality. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1143096.
• Ay, S., & Kılıç, T. (2023). Geographical digital divide: Urban-rural, regional, and gender inequalities in digital transformation in Turkey. Journal of Geography, 46(0), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.26650/jgeog2023-1169477.
• Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434-455.
• Bulut, E., & Çizgici Akyüz, G. (2020). The relationship between digital banking and economic growth in Turkey. Marmara University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 42(2), 223–246.
• Carlson, A., & Isaacs, A. M. (2018). Technological capital: An alternative to the digital divide. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(2), 243-265.
• Catalano, M. T., Leise, T. L., & Pfaff, T. J. (2009). Measuring resource inequality: The Gini coefficient. Numeracy, 2(2), Article 4.
• Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6), 1393–1414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388
• Chang, J., Yin, Q., Wang, P., Wang, W., Zuo, R., Zheng, Q., & Liu, J. (2012). Effect of fermented protein feedstuffs on pig production performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 36(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1012-652
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2007). Some models and measures for evaluating performances with DEA: Past accomplishments and future prospects. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 151–163.
• Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T., & Woessmann, L. (2011). Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 505–532.
• Çark, Ö. (2020). The impact of digital transformation on labor and professions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Inquiries, 4(Special Issue 1), 204–231.
• D’Andrea, A., & Limodio, N. (2024). High-speed internet, financial technology, and banking. Management Science, 70(2), 773–798.
• Ersezer, Ö., & Altun, D. D. (2024). E-commerce in Turkey during the digitalization process. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Studies, 4, 14–25.
• European Commission. (2012). A digital agenda for Europe. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Roos, P. (1995). Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies. International Journal of Production Economics, 39(1–2), 137–144.
• George, G., & Prabhu, G. N. (2003). Developmental financial institutions as technology policy instruments: Implications for innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Research Policy, 32(1), 89–108.
• Gladkova, A., & Ragnedda, M. (2020). Exploring digital inequalities in Russia: An interregional comparative analysis. Online Information Review, 44(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2019-0121.
• Grifell-Tatjé, E., & Lovell, C. K. (1999). A generalized Malmquist productivity index. TOP, 7, 81–101.
• Güngör Karyağdı, N. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on productivity in the banking sector: A case study of the TRB2 region. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 852–870. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ksusbd/issue/72391/990218.
• Helsper, E. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. SAGE Publications.
• Hui, Y., Wenjie, Z., & Shenglong, H. (2013). Social capital, digital inequality, and a “glocal” community informatics project in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Gansu Province. Library Trends, 62(1), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2013.0031.
• Inekwe, J. N. (2015). The contribution of R&D expenditure to economic growth in developing economies. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 727–745.
• Jeanneney, S. G., & Kpodar, K. (2011). Financial development and poverty reduction: Can there be a benefit without a cost? The Journal of Development Studies, 47(1), 143–163.
• Jiménez, M., Matus, J. A., & Martínez, M. A. (2014). Economic growth as a function of human capital, internet, and work. Applied Economics, 46(26), 3202–3210.
• Kıyak, B. (2023). Trends in digitalization in the manufacturing industry: A case study of the TR32 level 2 region. Regional Development Journal, 01(02), 140–154.
• Kim, D. H., Seo, J. N., Kim, H. S., & Lee, K. (2012). Estimation of productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in the Korean offshore fisheries. Fisheries Science, 78, 743–751.
• Kostyaev, A. I. (2024). Digital inequality between urban and rural populations. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 17(3), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.3.
• Lambert, P. J. (1985). Social welfare and the Gini coefficient revisited. Mathematical Social Sciences, 9(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(85)90003-4
• Li, Y., & Liu, C. (2010). Malmquist indices of total factor productivity changes in the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 28(9), 933–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003762231
• Lovell, C. K. (2003). The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 437–458. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41770140
• Luptáčik, M., & Nežinský, E. (2020). Measuring income inequalities beyond the Gini coefficient. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28(2), 561-578.
• Mahapatro, B. (2021). Human resource management. New Age International.
• Majeed, M. T., & Ayub, T. (2018). Information and communication technology (ICT) and economic growth nexus: A comparative global analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 12(2), 443-476.
• Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadística, 4(2), 209-242.
• Manca, F. (2012). Human capital composition and economic growth at the regional level. Regional Studies, 46(10), 1367-1388.
• Ministry of Development, Turkey. (2023). The eleventh development plan. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/IsgucuPiyasasi_ve_GencIstihdamiOzelIhtisasKomi
• Nair, M., Pradhan, R. P., & Arvin, M. B. (2020). Endogenous dynamics between R&D, ICT and economic growth: Empirical evidence from the OECD countries. Technology in Society, 62, 101315.
• Nerse, S. (2020). Inequalities in digital education: Rural–urban divides and socioeconomic differentiations. The Journal of Humanity and Society, 10(4), 413–444. https://doi.org/10.12658/M0548.insan.
• Nishimizu, M., & Page, J. M., Jr. (1982). Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965–1978. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 920-936.
• OECD. (2001). Understanding the digital divide. http://www.oecd.org/internet/interneteconomy/1888451.pdf.
• OECD. (2020). Economic resilience and regional economic disparities: The regional digital divide. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5d188b52-en.pdf?expires=1732706210.
• Oh, D. H. (2010). A global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 183-197.
• Omar, M. A., & Inaba, K. (2020). Does financial inclusion reduce poverty and income inequality in developing countries? A panel data analysis. Journal of Economic Structures, 9(1), 37.
• Özen, E. N. (2017). Bilgisayarlı otomasyon ve Türkiye’de işgücü piyasasının geleceği. TEPAV.
• Pastor, J. T., Asmild, M., & Lovell, C. K. (2011). The biennial Malmquist productivity change index. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 45(1), 10-15.
• Peng, Z., & Dan, T. (2023). Digital dividend or digital divide? Digital economy and urban–rural income inequality in China. Telecommunications Policy, 47(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102616.
• Pires, H. M., & Fernandes, E. (2012). Malmquist financial efficiency analysis for airlines. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(5), 1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.03.007.
• Quibria, M. G., Ahmed, S. N., Tschang, T., & Reyes-Macasaquit, M. L. (2003). Digital divide: Determinants and policies with special reference to Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 13(6), 811-825.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development. (2023). Eleventh development plan. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/IsgucuPiyasasi_ve_GencIstihdamiOzelIhtisasKomisyonuRaporu.pdf.
• Sánchez-Sellero, P., & Bataineh, M. J. (2022). How R&D cooperation, R&D expenditures, public funds, and R&D intensity affect green innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(9), 1095-1108.
• Sezgin, S., & Fırat, M. (2020). Transition to distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic and the threat of the digital divide. Open Education Applications and Research Journal, 6(4), 37–54. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1195678.
• Sparks, C. (2013). What is the “digital divide” and why is it important? Javnost-The Public, 20(2), 27-46.
• Stevenson, S. (2009). Digital divide: A discursive move away from the real inequities. The Information Society, 25(1), 1-22.
• Švarc, J., Lažnjak, J., & Dabić, M. (2021). The role of national intellectual capital in the digital transformation of EU countries: Another digital divide? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(4), 768–791.
• Teixeira, A. A., & Fortuna, N. (2010). Human capital, R&D, trade, and long-run productivity: Testing the technological absorption hypothesis for the Portuguese economy, 1960–2001. Research Policy, 39(3), 335-350.
• Telli, R., & Serin, Z. V. (2022). Determining health expenditure efficiency in developing countries using the Malmquist index. Journal of Productivity, (4), 723-740.
• Van Dijk, J. (2017). Afterword: The state of digital divide theory. In Theorizing Digital Divides (pp. 199-206). Routledge.
• Wijers, G. D. M. (2010). Determinants of the digital divide: A study on IT development in Cambodia. Technology in Society, 32(4), 336-341.
• Xiao, A., Xu, Z., Skare, M., Qin, Y., & Wang, X. (2024). Bridging the digital divide: The impact of technological innovation on income inequality and human interactions Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-18.
• Yankın, F. B. (2019). The working life in the process of digital transformation. Trakya University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 7(2), 1–38. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/639636.
• Yartey, C. A. (2008). Financial development, the structure of capital markets, and the global digital divide. Information Economics and Policy, 20(2), 208-227.
• Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Han, J. Y. (2010). Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 32(1), 194-201.