THE EFFECT OF MINIMALISM ON LIFE SATISFACTION OF GENERATION Z: THE FULL MEDIATION ROLE OF SELF-FULFILLMENT

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31, 355 - 381, 27.06.2025

Müzeyyen Gelibolu

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2025.014

Öz

Investigating Generation Z's minimalism orientation is critical for adopting strategies that promote sustainable practices, given that the rapid depletion of resources. The study aims to explore the impact of Generation Z consumers' minimalism orientation on their life satisfaction in the scope of consumer behaviour. This study aims to examine the impact of Generation Z consumers’ minimalism orientation on their life satisfaction within the scope of consumer behavior. A quantitative research method was employed, and the sample consisted of 228 participants aged between 18 and 26, classified as members of Generation Z. Data were collected using an online survey through convenience sampling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used for the analysis via SmartPLS software, and descriptive statistics were obtained through SPSS. The findings revealed that minimalism does not have a direct effect on life satisfaction among Generation Z consumers. However, minimalism positively influences self-fulfillment, and self-fulfillment, in turn, has a significant positive impact on life satisfaction. Furthermore, self-fulfillment was found to have a full mediating role in the relationship between minimalism and life satisfaction. Accordingly, minimalism enhances life satisfaction only when it meets psychological needs such as self-fulfillment among Generation Z consumers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Consumer minimalism , life satisfaction , generation Z , self fullfillment , sustainable consumption

Z KUŞAĞI TÜKETİCİLERİN MİNİMALİZM YÖNELİMLERİNİN YAŞAM TATMİNİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: KENDİNİ GERÇEKLEŞTİRMENİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Öz

Kaynakların hızla tüketildiği günümüzde geleceği şekillendirme potansiyeline sahip olan Z kuşağının minimalizm yönelimlerinin araştırılması, sürdürülebilir uygulamaları teşvik edecek pazarlama stratejilerinin benimsenmesi açısından önemlidir. Bu araştırmanın amacı Z kuşağı tüketicilerin minimalizm yönelimlerinin yaşam tatmini üzerindeki etkisini tüketici davranışları kapsamında araştırmaktır. Araştırmada nicel yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Z kuşağı olarak sınıflandırılan 18-26 aralığındaki tüketiciler oluşturmaktadır. Kolayda örnekleme ile çevrimiçi anket yöntemi kullanılarak 228 katılımcıdan veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın analizleri En Küçük Kareler Yöntemi Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (EKKY-YEM) ile gerçekleştirilmiş; tanımlayıcı istatistikler için SPSS yazılımı kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre minimalizmin Z kuşağı tüketicilerinin yaşam tatmini üzerinde doğrudan bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, minimalizmin kendini gerçekleştirme üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğu; kendini gerçekleştirmenin ise yaşam tatmini üzerinde pozitif bir etkisinin bulunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, kendini gerçekleştirmenin, minimalizmin yaşam tatmini üzerindeki etkisinde tam aracı rol oynadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda, minimalizmin yaşam tatminini artırabilmesi, Z kuşağının psikolojik gereksinimlerinden biri olan kendini gerçekleştirme ihtiyacını karşılaması durumunda mümkün olmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tüketici minimalizmi , yaşam tatmini , Z kuşağı , kendini gerçekleştirme , sürdürülebilir tüketim

Kaynakça

• Andersen, S. M., Chen, S., & Carter, C. (2000). Fundamental human needs: Making social cognition relevant. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 269-275. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449619
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489522.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(20), 416-436. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21.
• Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. H. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
• Dombrosky, K., Templeton, B., Fong, J., & Director, F. (2018). An insider’s guide to Generation Z and higher education 2018. University Professional and Continuing Education Association.
• Dopierała, R. (2017). Minimalism–a new mode of consumption? Przegląd Socjologiczny, 66(4), 67-83. https://doi.org/83.10.26485/PS/2017/66.4/4.
• Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
• Fu, L., Zhang, Z., & Nagai, Y. (2024). Minimalism and personal well-being: a study of current trends in China. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 34(7), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2231987.
• Gong, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Minimalism in social crowdedness: The impact of social crowding on minimalistic consumption practices. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113768.
• Grzeskowiak, S. & Sirgy, J. (2015). The life satisfaction process: The role of consumption centrality in life. 31ème Congrès de l’Association Française du Marketing-AFM bildiri kitabı içinde (ss.1-21). Fransa
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
• Hook, J. N., Hodge, A. S., Zhang, H., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Davis, D. E. (2023). Minimalism, voluntary simplicity, and well-being: A systematic review of the empirical literature. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(1), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1991450.
• Jain, V. K., Gupta, A., & Verma, H. (2024). Goodbye materialism: exploring antecedents of minimalism and its impact on millennials well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 19779-19805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03437-0.
• Jianping, L., Minrong, L., Jinnan, W., Jianjian, L., Hongwen, S., & Maoxing, H. (2014). Global environmental issues and human wellbeing. Report on Global Environmental Competitiveness (2013), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54678-5_1
• Joy, V., & Jain, V. K. (2024). Quest for less! Living with minimalism for building a better sustainable world-a qualitative study exploring millennials perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 10(4), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2024.141846.
• Kang, J., Martinez, C. M. J., & Johnson, C. (2021). Minimalism as a sustainable lifestyle: Its behavioural representations and contributions to emotional well-being. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 802-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.011.
• Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Kasser, T. (2009). Psychological need satisfaction, personal well-being, and ecological sustainability. Ecopsychology, 1(4), 175-180.https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0025.
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101.
• Kock, N., & Lynn, G.S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
• Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. S. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), 355–368.​ https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549909598391
• Lefever, S., Dal, M. & Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x.
• Lloyd, K., & Pennington, W. (2020). Towards a theory of minimalism and wellbeing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 5(3), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00030-y​.
• Malik, F., & Ishaq, M. I. (2023). Impact of minimalist practices on consumer happiness and financial well-being. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103333.
• Martin-Woodhead, A. (2022). Limited, considered and sustainable consumption: The (non)consumption practices of UK minimalists. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(4), 1012–1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211039608.
• Maslow A. H. (1954) Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
• Matte, J., Fachinelli, A. C., De Toni, D., Milan, G. S., & Olea, P. M. (2021). Relationship between minimalism, happiness, life satisfaction, and experiential consumption. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00191-w.
• McLeod, S. (2007). Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology. 03.12.2024 tarihinde https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow adresinden erişildi.
• Meissner, M. (2019). Against accumulation: lifestyle minimalism, de-growth and the present post-ecological condition. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1570962.
• Mishra, S., Moharana, T. R., Sharma, R., & Kautish, M. (2023). Exploring the role of self-conscious emotions between consumer minimalism and rental behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(5), 491-513. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-07-2023-0322.
• Nejad, S. G., Skeiseid, H. V., & Våland, T. I. (2024). Individual-level consumption reduction: Literature review and research propositions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143420.
• Pangarkar, A., Shukla, P., & Charles, R. (2021). Minimalism in consumption: A typology and brand engagement strategies. Journal of Business Research, 127, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.033.
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164.
• Rich, S. A., Hanna, S., Wright, B. J., & Bennett, P. C. (2017). Fact or fable: Increased wellbeing in voluntary simplicity. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i2.589.
• Richins, M. L. & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209304.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
• Shafqat, T., Ishaq, M. I., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Fashion consumption using minimalism: Exploring the relationship of consumer well-being and social connectedness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103215.
• Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5(14), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352944.
• Shukla, Y., Mishra, S., Chatterjee, R., & Arora, V. (2024). Consumer minimalism for sustainability: Exploring the determinants of rental consumption intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2227.
• Statista Research Department, (2024). Survey of share of Gen Z who are conscious of improving environmental impact in the U.S. 2022. 02.12.2024 tarihinde https://www.statista.com/statistics/1356482/us-improving-environmental-impact-gen-z/#statisticContainer adresinden erişildi. Tüik, (2023). İllere göre ortalama ilk evlenme yaşı. 03.12.2024 tarihinde https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Evlenme-ve-Bosanma-Istatistikleri-2023-53707 adresinden erişildi.
• Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2013). Maslow and the motivation hierarchy: Measuring satisfaction of the needs. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0155.
• Taş, S. (2020). Tüketim karşıtı yaşam tarzları: freeganizm, gönüllü sadelik ve minimalizm. Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, (6), 38-64. https://doi.org/10.48131/jscs.820039.
• Wilson A. V., & Bellezza, S. (2022). Consumer minimalism. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 796–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab064.
• Zalewska, J., & Cobel-Tokarska, M. (2016). Rationalization of pleasure and emotions: The analysis of the blogs of Polish minimalists. Polish Sociological Review, 196(4), 495-412. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26383044.