Kant'ın Descartes Eleştirisi: Cogito’dan Tecrübe Eden İstence Öznenin Yeniden Tanımlanması

Öz

Descartes’ın cogito önermesi, Aristotelesçi skolastik gelenekten köklü bir kopuş ile çağdaş felsefesinin başlangıç noktasını teşkil eder. Bu önerme ile Descartes, yalnız şüphenin kendisini bir hakikat dayanağı olarak kullanıp döneminin radikal şüpheciliğini aşmanın ötesinde, her ne kadar felsefesinin ileri aşamasında Aristoteles’in bilimin temel ilkesi olarak ele aldığı nedenselliği benimseyerek realizme dönse de felsefenin ilk sorunu olarak düşünen özneyi merkeze yerleştirir. Ancak Kant, Descartes’ın cogito önermesini özneyi yalnız düşünen bir şey olarak arı usun kendisinde, tecrübeden bağımsız ele alması nedeniyle hatalı bulur; “Arı Usun Eleştirisi” çalışmasında temelden eleştirir. Bu eleştiri sonrası, Kant’ın epistemolojinin merkezine özneyi koyan Kopernik Devrimi ve ahlaki yargıları bağladığı özgür irade ilkesi ile özne, düşünce gibi soyut bir beceriden değil, görüngüde tecrübe edilebilen bir istenç olarak ele alınmaya başlar. Bu makale, önce cogito önermesinin felsefi önemini, sonra da Kant’ın Descartes’a getirdiği dogmatik idealizm eleştirisi etrafında Kant felsefesinin ortaya koyduğu özne anlayışını tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Descartes
• Cogito
• Şüphecilik
• Kant
• Kopernik Devrimi
• İdealizm

Kant's Critique of Descartes: Redefining the Subject from Cogito to Experimenting Will

Öz

Descartes' cogito argument constitutes the beginning of the modern Western philosophy with a radical break from the Aristotelian scholastic tradition. With this argument, Descartes not only overcomes the radical skepticism of his time by using doubt itself as a foundation of truth, but also places the thinking subject itself at the center of philosophy as the first problem, even though in the later stages of his philosophy he returns to realism by adopting causality that Aristotle considered the fundamental principle of science. However, Kant finds Descartes’ cogito argument erroneous because it treats the subject as a thinking thing in the pure reason itself, independent of experience; he criticizes cogito fundamentally in his "Critique of Pure Reason". After this criticism, Kant's Copernican Turn, which puts the subject at the center of epistemology, and the ethical principle of free will, to which he links moral judgments, begin to treat the subject not as an abstract faculty like thought, but as a will that can be experienced in phenomena. This article aims to discuss first the philosophical significance of the cogito proposition and then the conception of the subject that Kantian philosophy reveals around Kant's criticism of Descartes' dogmatic idealism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Descartes
• Cogito
• Skepticism
• Kant
• Copernican Revolution
• Idealism

Kaynakça

1. Beiser, F. (2017). The Enlightenment and Idealism. İçinde K. Ameriks (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism (2. bs, ss. 21-42). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556511.004
2. Bermúdez, J. L. (1997). Scepticism and Science in Descartes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(4), 743-772. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953802
3. Bonevac, D. (2003). Kant’s Copernican revolution. İçinde The Age of German Idealism. Routledge.
4. Burch, G. B. (1962). The Place of Revelation in Philosophical Thought. The Review of Metaphysics, 15(3), 396-408.
5. Burke, P. (1981). Montaigne. Oxford University Press.
6. Cassirer, E. (2009). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment: Updated Edition. Princeton University Press.
7. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
8. Copleston, F. (1993a). A History of Philosophy, Volume 3: Late Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy: Ockham, Francis Bacon, and the Beginning of the Modern World (Image ed. edition). Image.

9. Copleston, F. (1993b). History of Philosophy, Vol. 6: From the French Enlightenment to Kant (Reprint edition). Image.
10. Copleston, F. (2003a). History of Philosophy Volume 4. Continuum International Publishing Group.
11. Copleston, F. (2003b). History of Philosophy Volume 5. Continuum.
12. Cummins, P. (1968). Kant on Outer and Inner Intuition. Noûs, 2(3), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214722
13. Currey, C. B. (1979). The Natural Theology of John Duns Scotus. Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale, 46, 183-213.
14. Descartes, R. (2008). Discourse on the Method. Cosimo, Inc.
15. Descartes, R. (2017). Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge University Press.
16. Dicker, G. (2013). Descartes: An Analytical and Historical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
17. Edwardes, M. P. J. (2019). What Is a Self? İçinde The Origins of Self (ss. 1-28). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13xprvd.6
18. Fiamma, A. (2022). Docta Ignorantia. Içinde M. Sgarbi (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy (ss. 1037-1040). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_1001
19. Flage, D. E., & Bonnen, C. A. (1992). Descartes and the Epistemology of Innate Ideas. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 9(1), 19-33.
20. Gardner, S. (1999). Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason (1st edition). Routledge.
21. Gilson, E. (2019). History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. CUA Press.
22. Glaser, H. A., & Vajda, G. M. (2000). Die Wende Von Der Aufklärung Zur Romantik 1760-1820: Epoche Im Überblick. John Benjamins Publishing.
23. Gutas, D. (2012). The Empiricism of Avicenna. https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-00402008
24. Guyer, P. (2006). Kant (First Edition). Routledge.
25. Hatfield, G. (2024). René Descartes. İçinde E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/descartes/
26. Kant, I. (1992). An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? (T. Humphrey, Çev.). Hackett Publishing. https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/Kant--What%20Is%20Enlightenment_.pdf
27. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
28. Kenny, A. (2007). A New History Of Western Philosophy. http://archive.org/details/a-new-history-of-western-philosophy-anthonny-kenny
29. Kneller, J. (2018). Chapter 1 The Copernican Turn in Early German Romanticism. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004388239_003
30. Larrissy, E. (1999). Romanticism and Postmodernism. Cambridge University Press.
31. Malcolm, N. (1963). Knowledge and Certainty: Essays and Lectures. Prentice-Hall.
32. Melchert, N. (2001). The Great Conversation: A Historical Introduction to Philosophy. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
33. Melnick, A. (2008). Kant’s Theory of the Self. Routledge.
34. Meyzaud, M. (2024). An Arab Predecessor to Western (Trans-)Secular Thought: The European Enlightenment’s Encounters with Ibn Ṭufayl and the Islamic Enlightenment. Political Theology, 0(0), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2024.2322184
35. Molina, E. (2017). Kant’s Conception of the Subject. CR: The New Centennial Review, 17(2), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.17.2.0077
36. Nash, R. H. (1969). The Light of the Mind: St. Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. University Press of Kentucky.
37. Paganini, G. (2017). Skepticism. İçinde The Routledge Companion to Seventeenth Century Philosophy. Routledge.
38. Rockmore, T. (2007). Kant and Idealism. Yale University Press.
39. Russell, B. (2007). A History of Western Philosophy. Simon & Schuster.
40. Schiffman, Z. S. (1984). Montaigne and the Rise of Skepticism in Early Modern Europe: A Reappraisal. Journal of the History of Ideas, 45(4), 499-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709370
41. Scholar, R. (2010). Montaigne and the Art of Free-thinking. Peter Lang.
42. Schwyzer, H. (1997). Subjectivity in Descartes and Kant. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 47(188), 342-357.
43. Stent, G. S. (1998). Epistemic Dualism of Mind and Body. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 142(4), 578-588.
44. Stroud, B. (1984). The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism (1st edition). Oxford University Press.
45. Tomar, M., & Peter, R. M. (2021). Existentialism and Postmodern: The Cult for Self. AuthorPress.
46. Van Becelaere, F. L. (1903). A Summary Exposition of Saint Thomas Aquinas’s Philosophy of Knowledge. The Philosophical Review, 12(6), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2176980
47. Ware, C. S. (1950). The Influence of Descartes on John Locke. A Bibliographical Study. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4(12), 210-230.
48. What Is Romanticism? (1966). Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 19(4), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3822814
49. Woolhouse, R. (1993). Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz: The Concept of Substance in Seventeenth Century Metaphysics (1st edition). Routledge.