Is Climate Change Ugly? Considering Climate Change as an Aesthetic Problem

Öz

Climate change inherently involves moral considerations, including the unequal distribution of responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions, the growing problem of desertification, the alarming loss of biodiversity, and other related issues. The central discussion revolves around three distinct aesthetic approaches. First, the paper critically evaluates formalist and subjectivist accounts, arguing that these perspectives are insufficient for comprehending the ethical and moral dimensions of climate change. Because, while formalist aesthetics develops a disinterested and abstract view on nature, the subjectivist approach is problematic due to the impossibility of reconciliation on the aesthetic judgments of nature. However, second, by integrating both cognitivist and moralist accounts, the paper offers a comprehensive perspective on climate change-driven aesthetic loss, incorporating both scientific objectivity and the moral significance of the issue. Illustrating this argument, in the paper, it examines specific examples of climate-related aesthetic loss, including Arctic ice melt, wildfires, and the aesthetic transformation of urban environments, framing these losses within the context of negative aesthetics. In conclusion, at the end, this paper aims to demonstrate that climate change should not be perceived solely as a political and ecological problem. Aesthetic theory, through a hybrid cognitivist and moralist account, offers crucial insights into the experience of climate change, while the moralist account offers the ethical and moral involvement, the cognitivist approach offers the scientific foundation for nature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aesthetics
• Climate Change
• Negative Aesthetics
• Cognitivist Account of Aesthetics
• Subjectivist Account of Aesthetics
• Moralist Account of Aesthetics
• Formalist Account of Aesthetics.

İklim Değişikliği Çirkin midir? İklim Değişikliğini Estetik Bir Problem Olarak Düşünmek

Öz

İklim değişikliği, sera gazı emisyonlarının sorumluluğunun eşitsiz dağılımı, artan çölleşme sorunu, biyolojik çeşitliliğin endişe verici kaybı ve diğer ilgili konular da dahil olmak üzere doğası gereği ahlaki değerlendirmeleri içerir. Metnin ana tartışması üç ayrı estetik yaklaşım çerçevesinde şekillenmiştir. İlk olarak, bu metin biçimci ve öznelci yaklaşımları, iklim değişikliğinin etik ve ahlaki boyutunu kavramada yetersiz olduklarını ileri sürerek eleştirel bir şekilde ele almıştır. Biçimci estetik, doğaya ilgisiz ve soyut bir bakış açısı ortaya koyarken, öznelci yaklaşım ise doğanın estetik yargıları üzerinde uzlaşının mümkün olmaması nedeniyle sorunludur. Buna karşın, ikinci olarak, bilişsel ve ahlaki yaklaşımlar bir arada ele alınarak hem bilimsel nesnellik hem de iklim değişikliğinin ahlaki önemi bir arada değerlendirilmekte ve böylece iklim değişikliği temelli estetik kayıplara ilişkin kapsamlı bir bakış açısı önerilmektedir. Bu argümanı açıklamak için metin, kutuplardaki buzulların erimesi, orman yangınları ve kentsel çevrelerin estetik dönüşümü gibi iklimle ilgili estetik kayıp örneklerini ele almakta ve bu örnekleri negatif estetik bağlamında değerlendirmektedir. Sonuç olarak, bu metin, iklim değişikliğinin yalnızca siyasi ve ekolojik bir mesele olarak algılanmaması gerektiğini göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Estetik teori, hibrit bir bilişsel ve ahlaki yaklaşım aracılığıyla iklim değişikliğine dair önemli görüşler sunmaktadır; ahlakçı yaklaşım etik ve ahlaki katılımı öne çıkarırken, bilişsel yaklaşım doğa için bilimsel bir temel ileri sürmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Estetik
• İklim Değişikliği
• Negatif Estetik
• Bilişsel Estetik Yaklaşım
• Öznelci Estetik Yaklaşım
• Ahlaki Estetik Yaklaşım
• Biçimci Estetik Yaklaşım.

Kaynakça

1. Badiou, A. (2004). Handbook of Inaesthetics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Beardsley, M. (1958). Taste Can Be Disputed. Swarthmore College Alumni Bulletin, 1-5.
3. Beardsley, M. (1969). The End of Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 2-4.
4. Bell, C. (1914). Art as Significant Form. In Art.
5. Bennett, M. M. (2020). Ruins of the Anthropocene: The Aesthetics of Arctic Climate Change. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-9.
6. Berleant, A. (2004). The Aesthetics of Art and Nature. In A. C. Arnold Berleant, The Aesthetics of Natural Environments (pp. 76-86). Toronto, Ontario: Broadview Press.
7. Berleant, A. (2010). Sensibility and Sense: The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World. World Imprint Academic.
8. Brady, E. (2011). The Ugly Truth: Negative Aesthetics and Environment. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 85-99.

9. Brady, E. (2014). Aesthetic Value, Ethics, and Climate Change. Environmental Values, 554-568.
10. Caney, S. (2006). Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights and Global Climate Change. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence19 (2), 261.
11. Carlson, A. (2005). Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art, and Architecture. New York, NY: Routledge.
12. Carlson, A. (2010). Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Requirements of Environmentalism. Environmental Values, 290-294.
13. Chukwumerije Okereke, P. C. (2018). Climate Change and Environmental Justice. In J. C. Ryan Holifield, The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice (p. 366). New York, NY: Routledge.
14. Currie, G. (1989). An Ontology of Art. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Curtin, D. W. (1982). Varieties of Aesthetic Formalism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism40 (3), 317-318.
16. Dowling, C. (n.d.). Aesthetic Formalism. Retrieved from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://iep.utm.edu/aesthetic-formalism/#:~:text=Formalism%20in%20aesthetics%20has%20traditionally,typically%20sight%20or%20hearing)%20alone.
17. Gaard, G. (2018). Feminism and environmental justice. In J. C. Ryan Holifield, The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice (p. 74). New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Jenni Niemela-Nyrhinen, N. U. (2021). Aesthetic Practices in the Climate Crisis: Intervening in the consensual frameworks of the sensible through images. Nordic Journal of Media Studies3 (1), 166-177.
19. Harrington, S. (2023). 8 artists who are grappling with climate change and imagining a better world. Retrieved from Yale Climate Connections: https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2023/01/8-artists-who-are-grappling-with-climate-change-and-imagining-a-better-world/
20. Kant, I. (1987). Critique of Judgment. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
21. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
22. Langer, S. (1953). Philosophy In a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. New York, NY: The New American Library.
23. Larry G. Harris, M. C. (2001). Changing community states in the Gulf of Maine: synergism between invaders, overfishing and climate change. Biological Invasionsvol. 3, 14.
24. Lefebvre, H. (2000). Writings on Cities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
25. Nehamas, A. (2000). An Essay on Beauty and Judgment. The Threepenny Review.
26. Novotny, P. (1995). Where we live, work and play: Refraining the cultural landscape of environmentalism in the environmental justice movement. New Political Science16 (1), 61-79.
27. Peek, E. (n.d.). Ethical Criticism of Art. Retrieved from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://iep.utm.edu/ethical-criticism-of-art/
28. Plato. (1991). The Republic. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
29. Randall, T. E. (2016). Climate Justice: A Literary Review. The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics9 (1), 249.
30. Robson, J. (2022). Aesthetics and Cognitive Science. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aesthetics-cogsci/
31. Walton, K. L. (1970). Categories of Art. The Philosophical Review79 (3), 350-351.
32. Wreen, M. J. (2005). Beardsley's Aesthetics. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beardsley-aesthetics/
33. Zangwill, N. (2000). In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism. The Philosophical Quarterly50 (201), 476-493.
34. Zangwill, N. (2005). Aesthetic Realism 1. In J. Levinson, Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics (pp. 63-79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.