Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism
Öz
What, on the view of many epistemologists, underlies the rationale for internalism is the deontological thought that epistemic justification proceeds in terms of how well our believing that p stands vis-à-vis relevant epistemic duties. However, in “Deontology and Defeat”, Bergmann argues that the view that justification is to be analyzed in deontic terms does not motivate internalism, as many are inclined to suppose. I argue that Bergmann’s argument fails to show this, for the reason that his argument is based on equating S’s belief that his second-order belief that p is epistemically irrational with the notion of epistemic defeat, the presence of which is sufficient but not necessary for epistemic irrationality.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- ALSTON, William (1989) Epistemic Justification, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- BERGMAN, Michael (2000) “Deontology and Defeat”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. LX, No.1, 87-102.
- CHISHOLM, Roderick (1977) Theory of Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
- GINET, Carl (1975) Knowledge, Perception and Memory, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
- GRECO, John (1990) “Internalism and Epistemically Responsible Belief”, Synthese 85, 245-277.
- GOLDMAN, Alvin (1986) Epistemology and Cognition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- GOLDMAN, Alvin (1999) “Internalism Exposed”, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. XCVI, No.6, 271-293.
- FOLEY, Richard (1987) The theory of Epistemic Rationality, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
eng
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Ekim 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi
25 Şubat 2016
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2014 Sayı: 23
APA
Öztürk, F. (2014). Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 23, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.20636
AMA
1.Öztürk F. Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism. Kaygı. 2014;(23):103-115. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.20636
Chicago
Öztürk, Fatih. 2014. “Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy 23: 103-15. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.20636.
EndNote
Öztürk F (01 Ekim 2014) Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 23 103–115.
IEEE
[1]F. Öztürk, “Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism”, Kaygı, sy 23, ss. 103–115, Eki. 2014, doi: 10.20981/kuufefd.20636.
ISNAD
Öztürk, Fatih. “Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi. 23 (01 Ekim 2014): 103-115. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.20636.
JAMA
1.Öztürk F. Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism. Kaygı. 2014;:103–115.
MLA
Öztürk, Fatih. “Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy 23, Ekim 2014, ss. 103-15, doi:10.20981/kuufefd.20636.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Öztürk. Epistemic Defeat, Deontology and Internalism. Kaygı. 01 Ekim 2014;(23):103-15. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.20636
Cited By
Eğitim Yönetiminde Geleneksel Bilim Eleştirisi: Evers ve Lakomski’nin Natüralist Bağdaşımcı Epistemolojisi Üzerine Düşünceler
İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.330362