BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Globalization and Adorno's Industrialization of Culture

Yıl 2016, , 181 - 186, 30.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.35110

Öz

With the arrival of the last quarter of the twentieth century, the rapid and pervasive changes that occurred in almost all aspects of life including but not limited to art, philosophy, architecture, and literature removed the international borders. The world gradually became homogenized. This new epoch emerged under the name of globalization in the contexts such as new world order and postmodernity. With globalization, subjects eating the same food, drinking the same beverages, listening to the same music, and watching the same things also began to think and feel the same way. The liveliness created by different cultures was replaced with the mass culture, mixing everything together and making them homogenized and universalized. What makes all of these possible is the "Culture Industry". Believing that the Marxist critical social theory was no longer adequate, Adorno developed a new critical social theory against this new order based on the Frankfurt School of critical theory and predicated upon a critique of mass culture. In his theory, he used the concept of culture industry. He chosed the term "culture industry” instead of “mass culture” and saw culture as a product systematically produced and disseminated by the culture industry, instead of something that was born out of the mass itself.

Kaynakça

  • Adorno, T. W (2003) “Kültür Endüstrisini Yeniden Düşünürken”, çev. Bülent O. Doğan, Cogito, Sayı: 36, Yaz 2003, pp. 76-84.
  • Adorno, T. W. (2007) Kültür Endüstrisi- Kültür Yönetimi, çev. N. Ünler, M. Tüzel, E. Gen, İstanbul, İletişim Yayınları.
  • Apigenes, R. And Garratt, C. (1996) Postmodenizm, İstanbul, Milliyet Yayınları.
  • Connor, S. (2005) Postmodernist Kültür, çev. Doğan Şahiner, İstanbul, Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Dellalloğlu, B. F. (2003) “Bir Giriş: Adorno Yüz Yaşında”, Cogito, Sayı: 36, Yaz 2003, pp. 13-36.
  • Jameson, F. (1993) “Postmodernizm ve Tüketim Toplumu”, çev. H. Güleryüz, V. Aytar, Edebiyat ve Eleştiri Dergisi, Ocak-Şubat 1993, İzmir.
  • Swingewood, A. (1996) Kitle Kültürü Efsanesi, çev. Aykut Kansu, Ankara, Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
Toplam 7 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Abamüslim Akdemir

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 10 Haziran 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016

Kaynak Göster

APA Akdemir, A. (2016). Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(26), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.35110
AMA Akdemir A. Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture. Kaygı. Nisan 2016;(26):181-186. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.35110
Chicago Akdemir, Abamüslim. “Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 26 (Nisan 2016): 181-86. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.35110.
EndNote Akdemir A (01 Nisan 2016) Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 26 181–186.
IEEE A. Akdemir, “Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture”, Kaygı, sy. 26, ss. 181–186, Nisan 2016, doi: 10.20981/kuufefd.35110.
ISNAD Akdemir, Abamüslim. “Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 26 (Nisan 2016), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.35110.
JAMA Akdemir A. Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture. Kaygı. 2016;:181–186.
MLA Akdemir, Abamüslim. “Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 26, 2016, ss. 181-6, doi:10.20981/kuufefd.35110.
Vancouver Akdemir A. Globalization and Adorno’s Industrialization of Culture. Kaygı. 2016(26):181-6.

e-ISSN: 2645-8950