BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 22 - Kaygı (22) 2014, 45 - 64, 30.04.2014
https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.19827

Öz

The concept of prohairesis in Aristotelian ethics, usually translated as deliberate choice or policy decision, is later revived by Epictetus, a major figure among the Stoics. In this paper I critically examine how the concept of prohairesis is employed by Aristotle and by Epictetus and the differences involved. Aristotle’s concept of prohairesis acquires its meaning in a framework according to which we live in a world where at least some things are up to us whereas Epictetus’s concept of prohairesis acquires its meaning in a framework where nothing is up to us. As such, Aristotle’s concept of prohairesis is essentially about choice and assumes freedom and thereby more ethical in character, whereas Epictetus’s concept of prohairesis is used to provide a metaphysical basis for freedom and as such less ethical in character.

Kaynakça

  • ARISTOTLE (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle, the revised Oxford translation, edited by J. Barnes, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • BENNETT, Byard (2001) “Review of Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, by Richard Sorabji”, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2001.10.38.
  • BOBZIEN, Susanne (2001) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, New York: Oxford University.
  • DOBBIN, Robert (1991) “Prohairesis in Epictetus”, Ancient Philosophy, 11(1)/1991: 111-135.
  • EPICTETUS (1966-7) The Discourses as reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments, translated by W. A. Oldfather, vol. I and II, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • KAHN, Charles (1988) “Discovering the Will: From Aristotle to Augustine”, The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, eds. John Dillon and Anthony Long, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • LONG, Anthony (2002) Epictetus - A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • SORABJI, Richard (1973-4) “Aristotle on the Role of Intellect in Virtue”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 74/1973-4: 107-129.
  • SORABJI, Richard (1980) Necessity, Cause and Blame, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • SORABJI, Richard (1993) Animals Minds and Human Morals, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • SORABJI, Richard (2000) Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • SORABJI, Richard (2005) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200-600 AD: a sourcebook vol. 1, Psychology (with ethics and religion), Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • SORABJI, Richard (2006) Self, Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life and Death, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Toplam 13 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil eng
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Sinem Hatipoğlu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Şubat 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2014 Sayı: 22 - Kaygı (22) 2014

Kaynak Göster

APA Hatipoğlu, S. (2014). Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(22), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.19827
AMA Hatipoğlu S. Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study. Kaygı. Nisan 2014;(22):45-64. doi:10.20981/kuufefd.19827
Chicago Hatipoğlu, Sinem. “Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 22 (Nisan 2014): 45-64. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.19827.
EndNote Hatipoğlu S (01 Nisan 2014) Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 22 45–64.
IEEE S. Hatipoğlu, “Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study”, Kaygı, sy. 22, ss. 45–64, Nisan 2014, doi: 10.20981/kuufefd.19827.
ISNAD Hatipoğlu, Sinem. “Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 22 (Nisan 2014), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.20981/kuufefd.19827.
JAMA Hatipoğlu S. Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study. Kaygı. 2014;:45–64.
MLA Hatipoğlu, Sinem. “Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 22, 2014, ss. 45-64, doi:10.20981/kuufefd.19827.
Vancouver Hatipoğlu S. Prohairesis in Aristotle and Epictetus: A Comparative Study. Kaygı. 2014(22):45-64.

Cited By

Aristoteles Düşüncesinde Politik Biyoloji ve Prohairesis
Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi
Efe BAŞTÜRK
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.539668

e-ISSN: 2645-8950