BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant's Epistemology

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 20 - Kaygı (20) 2013, 65 - 78, 15.04.2013

Öz

Kant and previous philosophers in the modern philosophy have inquired into the limit of human knowledge, so the limitation of knowledge is the result of a basic view of the Critical philosophy. According to most of the modern philosophers, before one wants to attempt to know God, the essence of being, etc., he or she must first investigate the capacity of knowledge itself in order to see whether it is able to accomplish such an attempt.
Hegel criticizes this view in the Encyclopedia, section 10. He claims that the task to examine knowledge before using it is based on a false analogy with tools. If one does not want to fool oneself with words, it is easy to see that other instruments can be investigated and criticized without using them in the particular work for which they were designed. But the investigation of knowledge can only be performed by an act of knowledge.

Kaynakça

  • Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), (1993) The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beiser, Frederick C., (2005) Hegel, New York and London: Routledge.
  • Deligiorgi, Katerina (ed.), (2006) Hegel: New Directions, Chesham: Acumen.
  • Forster, Michael N., (1989) Hegel and Skepticism, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Hegel,G. W. F., (1892) Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. By E. S. Haldane, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd. London.
  • Hegel, G. W. F., (1977) Phenomenology of Spirit, A. V. Miller (Translator), Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Hegel, G. W. F., (1991) the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences, trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris, Indianapolis: Hackett.
  • Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the Philosophy of History, trans. J. Sibree New York: Dover, 1956.
  • Kant, Immanuel, (1929), Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp-Smith (trans.), London: Macmillan.
  • Kojève, Alexandre, (1969), Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, Allan Bloom (ed.), J. H. Nichols, Jr. (trans.), New York: Basic Books.
  • Lukács, Georg, (1975) The Young Hegel, trans. R. Livingston, London: Merlin Press.
  • Popper, Karl, (1945) The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 volumes, London: Routledge.
  • Prichard, Harold Arthur, (2009) Kant's Theory of Knowledge, Cornell University Library.
  • Rockmore, Tom, (1986) Hegel's Circular Epistemology, Bloomington Indiana University Press.
  • Solomon, Robert, (1983) In the Spirit of Hegel, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stern, Robert, (1990) Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object, London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, Charles, (1975) Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yıl 2013, Sayı: 20 - Kaygı (20) 2013, 65 - 78, 15.04.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), (1993) The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beiser, Frederick C., (2005) Hegel, New York and London: Routledge.
  • Deligiorgi, Katerina (ed.), (2006) Hegel: New Directions, Chesham: Acumen.
  • Forster, Michael N., (1989) Hegel and Skepticism, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Hegel,G. W. F., (1892) Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. By E. S. Haldane, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd. London.
  • Hegel, G. W. F., (1977) Phenomenology of Spirit, A. V. Miller (Translator), Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Hegel, G. W. F., (1991) the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences, trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris, Indianapolis: Hackett.
  • Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the Philosophy of History, trans. J. Sibree New York: Dover, 1956.
  • Kant, Immanuel, (1929), Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp-Smith (trans.), London: Macmillan.
  • Kojève, Alexandre, (1969), Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, Allan Bloom (ed.), J. H. Nichols, Jr. (trans.), New York: Basic Books.
  • Lukács, Georg, (1975) The Young Hegel, trans. R. Livingston, London: Merlin Press.
  • Popper, Karl, (1945) The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 volumes, London: Routledge.
  • Prichard, Harold Arthur, (2009) Kant's Theory of Knowledge, Cornell University Library.
  • Rockmore, Tom, (1986) Hegel's Circular Epistemology, Bloomington Indiana University Press.
  • Solomon, Robert, (1983) In the Spirit of Hegel, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stern, Robert, (1990) Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object, London: Routledge.
  • Taylor, Charles, (1975) Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil eng
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

A. Çüçen

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2013
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Şubat 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Sayı: 20 - Kaygı (20) 2013

Kaynak Göster

APA Çüçen, A. (2013). Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(20), 65-78.
AMA Çüçen A. Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology. Kaygı. Nisan 2013;(20):65-78.
Chicago Çüçen, A. “Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 20 (Nisan 2013): 65-78.
EndNote Çüçen A (01 Nisan 2013) Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 20 65–78.
IEEE A. Çüçen, “Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology”, Kaygı, sy. 20, ss. 65–78, Nisan 2013.
ISNAD Çüçen, A. “Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 20 (Nisan 2013), 65-78.
JAMA Çüçen A. Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology. Kaygı. 2013;:65–78.
MLA Çüçen, A. “Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 20, 2013, ss. 65-78.
Vancouver Çüçen A. Hegel’s Interpretation of Kant’s Epistemology. Kaygı. 2013(20):65-78.

e-ISSN: 2645-8950