Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity

Yıl 2016, Sayı: 27, 245 - 261, 30.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.287824

Öz

This article takes a close look at the discussion of singularity in Jean-Luc Nancy’s The Inoperative Community and Being Singular Plural as an attempt to negate the subject/object dichotomy and create a new context for a re-evaluation of resistance. With its aim of refuting individualistic subjectivity, the philosophy of singularity puts forward that the humanist point of view unnecessarily polarizes individuality and community. By placing a challenging scenario of antihumanism against the humanist sense of responsibility, the philosophy of singularity questions whether it is possible to do philosophy without saying ‘I’. This antihumanist stance, which replaces the ‘I’/‘other’ differentiation with Nancy’s ‘the other of another,’ chooses to strengthen the link between ontology and resistance in the notion of coexistence, beyond traditional hypotheses on immanence or transcendence. In order to discover the manifestation of coexistence within the frame of an antihumanist philosophy of singularity, this article begins with digging deep under the notion of individualistic subjectivity to show that it embodies a hollow and plastic category. Following this, Nancy’s stress on the term ‘ecstasy’ will be grounded upon the Freudian theory of drives and the concept of coexistence will be situated in a dark realm that the humanist worldview would expect in the least. And finally, against the background of this theoretical structure, values such as modesty and responsibility will be highlighted as an attempt to uncover an alternative moral consciousness that weaves itself out of an indefinite possibility lurking under the skin of the individual/community enigma.

Kaynakça

  • ADORNO, Theodor (1973) The Jargon of Authenticity, 1st Edition, Evanston: Northwestern UP.
  • AGAMBEN, Giorgio (2007) The Coming Community, 1st Edition, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • BATAILLE, Georges (2001) Eroticism, 1st Edition, London: Penguin Books Ltd.
  • BLANCHOT, Maurice (1988) The Unavowable Community, 1st Edition, New York: Station Hill.
Toplam 4 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Dilara Bilgisel Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ekim 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 24 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Sayı: 27

Kaynak Göster

APA Bilgisel, D. (2016). An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(27), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.287824
AMA Bilgisel D. An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity. Kaygı. Ekim 2016;(27):245-261. doi:10.20981/kaygi.287824
Chicago Bilgisel, Dilara. “An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 27 (Ekim 2016): 245-61. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.287824.
EndNote Bilgisel D (01 Ekim 2016) An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 27 245–261.
IEEE D. Bilgisel, “An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity”, Kaygı, sy. 27, ss. 245–261, Ekim 2016, doi: 10.20981/kaygi.287824.
ISNAD Bilgisel, Dilara. “An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 27 (Ekim 2016), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.287824.
JAMA Bilgisel D. An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity. Kaygı. 2016;:245–261.
MLA Bilgisel, Dilara. “An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 27, 2016, ss. 245-61, doi:10.20981/kaygi.287824.
Vancouver Bilgisel D. An Antihumanist Reinterpretation of the Philosophy of Singularity. Kaygı. 2016(27):245-61.

e-ISSN: 2645-8950