Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Richness of Perceptual Content

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 21 - Kaygı (21) 2013, 111 - 126, 15.10.2013

Öz

This study aims to present one of the most effective arguments given against conceptualism about perceptual content. Conceptualism is the view that perceptual content is wholly conceptual, so that a subject cannot undergo a perceptual experience unless he possesses concepts that properly characterize the content of his experience. The Argument from Richness of Perceptual Content states that perceptual content cannot be conceptual because it contains so many details that it is unlikely that a subject deploys so many concepts while having a perceptual experience.

Kaynakça

  • BREWER, Bill (1999) Perception and Reason, Oxford: Calderon Press.
  • CHUARD, Philippe (2007) “The Riches of Experience,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2007/14: 20-42.
  • CRANE, Tim (1992) “The Nonconceptual Content of Experience,” The Contents of Experience, ed. by T. Crane, pp. 136-156, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • DRETSKE, Fred (1969) Seeing and Knowing, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • DRETSKE, Fred (2003) “Sensation and Perception,” Essays on Nonconceptual Content, ed. by York H. Gunther, pp. 25-41, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • GUYER, Paul (2006) Kant, London and New York: Routledge.
  • HANNAH, Robert (2006) Kant, Science and Human Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • HECK Jr., Richard G. (2000) “Nonconceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons,” The Philosophical Review, 2000/109: 483-523.
  • KELLY, Sean Dorrance (2001) “Demonstrative Concepts and Experience,” The Philosophical Review, 2001/110: 397-420.
  • LOWE, Jonathan (2000) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MARTIN, M. G. F. (1992) “Perception, Concepts and Memory,” The Philosophical Review, 1992/101: 745-753.
  • MCDOWELL, John (1996) Mind and World, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.
  • NOË, Alva (2002) “Is the Visual World a Grand Illusion?” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2002/ 9: 1-11.
  • RENSINK, R., Kevin O’REGAN & James J. CLARK (2000) “On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions,” Visual Cognition, 2000/7: 127-145.
  • TYE, Michael (2005) “On the Nonconceptual Content of Experience,” Experience and Analysis, ed. by M. E. Reicher & J.C. Marek, pp. 221-239, Vienna.
Yıl 2013, Sayı: 21 - Kaygı (21) 2013, 111 - 126, 15.10.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • BREWER, Bill (1999) Perception and Reason, Oxford: Calderon Press.
  • CHUARD, Philippe (2007) “The Riches of Experience,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2007/14: 20-42.
  • CRANE, Tim (1992) “The Nonconceptual Content of Experience,” The Contents of Experience, ed. by T. Crane, pp. 136-156, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • DRETSKE, Fred (1969) Seeing and Knowing, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • DRETSKE, Fred (2003) “Sensation and Perception,” Essays on Nonconceptual Content, ed. by York H. Gunther, pp. 25-41, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • GUYER, Paul (2006) Kant, London and New York: Routledge.
  • HANNAH, Robert (2006) Kant, Science and Human Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • HECK Jr., Richard G. (2000) “Nonconceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons,” The Philosophical Review, 2000/109: 483-523.
  • KELLY, Sean Dorrance (2001) “Demonstrative Concepts and Experience,” The Philosophical Review, 2001/110: 397-420.
  • LOWE, Jonathan (2000) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MARTIN, M. G. F. (1992) “Perception, Concepts and Memory,” The Philosophical Review, 1992/101: 745-753.
  • MCDOWELL, John (1996) Mind and World, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.
  • NOË, Alva (2002) “Is the Visual World a Grand Illusion?” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2002/ 9: 1-11.
  • RENSINK, R., Kevin O’REGAN & James J. CLARK (2000) “On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions,” Visual Cognition, 2000/7: 127-145.
  • TYE, Michael (2005) “On the Nonconceptual Content of Experience,” Experience and Analysis, ed. by M. E. Reicher & J.C. Marek, pp. 221-239, Vienna.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Pakize Arıkan Sandıkcıoğlu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Ekim 2013
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Ocak 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Sayı: 21 - Kaygı (21) 2013

Kaynak Göster

APA Sandıkcıoğlu, P. A. (2013). The Richness of Perceptual Content. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(21), 111-126.
AMA Sandıkcıoğlu PA. The Richness of Perceptual Content. Kaygı. Ekim 2013;(21):111-126.
Chicago Sandıkcıoğlu, Pakize Arıkan. “The Richness of Perceptual Content”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 21 (Ekim 2013): 111-26.
EndNote Sandıkcıoğlu PA (01 Ekim 2013) The Richness of Perceptual Content. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 21 111–126.
IEEE P. A. Sandıkcıoğlu, “The Richness of Perceptual Content”, Kaygı, sy. 21, ss. 111–126, Ekim 2013.
ISNAD Sandıkcıoğlu, Pakize Arıkan. “The Richness of Perceptual Content”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 21 (Ekim 2013), 111-126.
JAMA Sandıkcıoğlu PA. The Richness of Perceptual Content. Kaygı. 2013;:111–126.
MLA Sandıkcıoğlu, Pakize Arıkan. “The Richness of Perceptual Content”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 21, 2013, ss. 111-26.
Vancouver Sandıkcıoğlu PA. The Richness of Perceptual Content. Kaygı. 2013(21):111-26.

e-ISSN: 2645-8950