Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Does the Freedom Sentence Work?

Yıl 2011, Sayı: 16, 37 - 45, 15.04.2011

Slávka Démuthová

Öz

In the presented study, the main objectives of the freedom sentence are stressed. They are compared with the reality of statistics and practice in the imprisonment houses. Numbers of recidivists show the need for a better evaluation of the expected influences of this kind of punishment. Among various theories of criminality, the Cloninger´s biosocial theory is presented. Within these terms, an antisocial personality is characterized through the high level of novelty seeking, low level of reward dependence and harm avoidance. This model provides an explanatory background for understanding persistent social failures as well as low correctional potential of the prison. It turns an attention to the basic problems of freedom and determinism, which are discussed at the closure of the paper.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Freedom Criminality Imprisonment Sentence Correction Neurochemistry

Kaynakça

  • CLONINGER, C.R.: (1987) A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 44, June, pp. 537 – 588.
  • DÉMUTHOVÁ, S.: (2006) Mladistvý delikvent. Pusté Úľany, Schola Philosophica.
  • DÉMUTHOVÁ, S.: (2005) Dieťa a mladistvý ako páchateľ trestnej činnosti. In: ČECH, J. et al.: Psychológia pre políciu a justíciu. Trnava, UCM, pp. 203 – 216.
  • DÉMUTHOVÁ, S., MUTALOVÁ, N.: (2010) Prežívanie trestu odňatia slobody dospelými mužmi. In: Démuthová, S. (Ed.): Kondášove dni 2010. Zborník abstraktov. Trnava,Katedra psychológie Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave, p. 11.
  • FOUCAULT, M.: (1995) Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York, Vintage Books.
  • HEIDBRINK, H.: (1997)Psychologie morálního vývoje. Praha, Portál.
  • HEIDBRINK, H.: Jean Piaget. In: LÜCK, H. E., MILLER, R.: (1999) Illustrierte Geschichte der Psychologie. 2. Auflage. Weinheim, Psychologie Verlag Union, pp. 131 – 135.
  • HERETIK, A.: (1994) Základy forenznej psychológie. Bratislava, SPN.
  • KANT, I.: (1922) Die Krankheiten von antropologischer, pragmatischer Hinsicht. Stuttgart.
  • KENDALL, P., MOSES Jr., J.: (1980) Impulsivity and persistence in adult inpatient “impulse” offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, Nr. 1, pp. 363 – 365.
  • MS SR - Ministerstvo spravodlivosti Slovenskej republiky (Ministry of Justice of the Slovak republic) – Štatistické ročenky. [online], Available on URL: <http://www.justice.gov.sk/wfn.aspx?pg=r3&htm=r3/statr.htm> [cit. 2010-07-04].
  • NOYAN, C.O. et al.: (2009) Antisosyal kiflilik bzukluğu tanılı bireylerin karar verme süreçleri ile psikopati ve mizaç-karakter özellikleri arasındaki ilişki. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 19, Suppl. 1, pp. S257-S259.
  • SCIENCE, Selections from Science, The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. [online], Available on URL: <http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/nobelprize/> [cit. 2010-07-05].
  • SIEGEL, L.J., SENNA, J.J.: (1988) Juvenile delinquency. Theory, practice, and law. 3rd edition. New York, West Publishing Company.
  • TIKKANEN, R. et al.: (2007) Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire data on alcoholic violent offenders: specific connections to severe impulsive cluster B personality disorders and violent criminality. BMC Psychiatry, 7, pp. 36 – 42.
  • Trestný zákon – Zákon 300/2005 Zb. zákonov, čiastka 129, IURA EDITION, s.r.o. 2005.

Yıl 2011, Sayı: 16, 37 - 45, 15.04.2011

Slávka Démuthová

Öz

Kaynakça

  • CLONINGER, C.R.: (1987) A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 44, June, pp. 537 – 588.
  • DÉMUTHOVÁ, S.: (2006) Mladistvý delikvent. Pusté Úľany, Schola Philosophica.
  • DÉMUTHOVÁ, S.: (2005) Dieťa a mladistvý ako páchateľ trestnej činnosti. In: ČECH, J. et al.: Psychológia pre políciu a justíciu. Trnava, UCM, pp. 203 – 216.
  • DÉMUTHOVÁ, S., MUTALOVÁ, N.: (2010) Prežívanie trestu odňatia slobody dospelými mužmi. In: Démuthová, S. (Ed.): Kondášove dni 2010. Zborník abstraktov. Trnava,Katedra psychológie Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave, p. 11.
  • FOUCAULT, M.: (1995) Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York, Vintage Books.
  • HEIDBRINK, H.: (1997)Psychologie morálního vývoje. Praha, Portál.
  • HEIDBRINK, H.: Jean Piaget. In: LÜCK, H. E., MILLER, R.: (1999) Illustrierte Geschichte der Psychologie. 2. Auflage. Weinheim, Psychologie Verlag Union, pp. 131 – 135.
  • HERETIK, A.: (1994) Základy forenznej psychológie. Bratislava, SPN.
  • KANT, I.: (1922) Die Krankheiten von antropologischer, pragmatischer Hinsicht. Stuttgart.
  • KENDALL, P., MOSES Jr., J.: (1980) Impulsivity and persistence in adult inpatient “impulse” offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, Nr. 1, pp. 363 – 365.
  • MS SR - Ministerstvo spravodlivosti Slovenskej republiky (Ministry of Justice of the Slovak republic) – Štatistické ročenky. [online], Available on URL: <http://www.justice.gov.sk/wfn.aspx?pg=r3&htm=r3/statr.htm> [cit. 2010-07-04].
  • NOYAN, C.O. et al.: (2009) Antisosyal kiflilik bzukluğu tanılı bireylerin karar verme süreçleri ile psikopati ve mizaç-karakter özellikleri arasındaki ilişki. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 19, Suppl. 1, pp. S257-S259.
  • SCIENCE, Selections from Science, The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. [online], Available on URL: <http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/nobelprize/> [cit. 2010-07-05].
  • SIEGEL, L.J., SENNA, J.J.: (1988) Juvenile delinquency. Theory, practice, and law. 3rd edition. New York, West Publishing Company.
  • TIKKANEN, R. et al.: (2007) Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire data on alcoholic violent offenders: specific connections to severe impulsive cluster B personality disorders and violent criminality. BMC Psychiatry, 7, pp. 36 – 42.
  • Trestný zákon – Zákon 300/2005 Zb. zákonov, čiastka 129, IURA EDITION, s.r.o. 2005.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Slávka Démuthová Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2011
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Şubat 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Sayı: 16

Kaynak Göster

APA Démuthová, S. (2011). Does the Freedom Sentence Work?. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi(16), 37-45.
AMA Démuthová S. Does the Freedom Sentence Work?. Kaygı. Nisan 2011;(16):37-45.
Chicago Démuthová, Slávka. “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 16 (Nisan 2011): 37-45.
EndNote Démuthová S (01 Nisan 2011) Does the Freedom Sentence Work?. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 16 37–45.
IEEE S. Démuthová, “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”, Kaygı, sy. 16, ss. 37–45, Nisan 2011.
ISNAD Démuthová, Slávka. “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi 16 (Nisan 2011), 37-45.
JAMA Démuthová S. Does the Freedom Sentence Work?. Kaygı. 2011;:37–45.
MLA Démuthová, Slávka. “Does the Freedom Sentence Work?”. Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, sy. 16, 2011, ss. 37-45.
Vancouver Démuthová S. Does the Freedom Sentence Work?. Kaygı. 2011(16):37-45.

e-ISSN: 2645-8950