PUBLIC POLICY GOVERNANCE: SOME INSIGHTS INTO ITS SCOPE AND APPLICATION, STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE LITERATURE

Öz

Kamu politikası yönetişiminin (PPG) yeniliği, mevcut literatürdeki konumunun anlaşılmasına yönelik ilgiyi artırmaktadır. Bu nedenle makale, kamu politikası yönetişimi kavramının akade mik çalışmalarda uygulandığı alan ve kapsamı, kavramsal formülasyonu ve literatürdeki güçlü ve zayıf yönleriyle birlikte sunmayı amaçla maktadır. Makalede nitel ikincil araştırma ve belgesel analizi uygulanmıştır. Genel olarak bul gular, PPG kavramının incelenen çağdaş litera türde minimum düzeyde uygulandığını (%15) göstermektedir; bu da, 2000 yılında çevrimiçi literatürde ilk kez kullanılmasına rağmen hala nispeten yeni bir çalışma alanı olduğunu düşün dürmektedir. Bununla birlikte, minimum düzey de kullanılmasına rağmen, PPG, gerçekliğini tasvir eden temel unsurları sunmaktadır. Ayrıca PPG bir süreç ve akademik çerçeve olarak ta sarlanmıştır ve yerel, bölgesel, ulusal ve küresel düzeylerde uygulanabilir. Kavramsal genişleme zorluklarıyla, öğelerinin örtüşmesiyle ve temel değerlerinin dışlanmasıyla karşı karşıyadır. Literatürü geliştirmek için, PPG’nin kamu politikası sürecinin kapsamını ve politika paydaşları ağları arasında gücün yatay paylaşımı, kurallar, ilkeler ve normların yanı sıra PPG için etik, iyi yönetişim unsurları ve araçları da kapsaması gerekir. İyi bir PPG eksikliğinden kaynaklanan politika sorunlarının yeterli düzeyde tartışılması ve ampirik olarak araştırılması teşvik edilmektedir. PPG’nin kavramsal zorluklarının etkilerini en aza indirmek için, ölçülebilir ve önerilen çalışmayla ilgili birkaç PPG argümanının ve değişkeninin dikkatli bir şekilde seçilmesi gerekir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public policy
• public policy governance
• participatory public policy
• new public governance
• new public management

Destekleyen Kurum

The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy

Proje Numarası

1

Etik Beyan

The study was registered by the Department of Research and Consultancy of The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy in Tanzania

Teşekkür

Thanks to the Department of Research and Consultancy of The Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy in Tanzania for registering the study, and to the reviewers of the Journal of Public Administration and Policy.

PUBLIC POLICY GOVERNANCE: SOME INSIGHTS INTO ITS SCOPE AND APPLICATION, STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE LITERATURE

Öz

The innovation of public policy governance (PPG) sparks interest in understanding its po sition in the current literature. Thus, the paper aims to present the scope and extent to which the notion of public policy governance has been applied in scholarly works, together with strengths and weaknesses related to its concep tual formulation and that of the literature. The paper applied qualitative secondary research and documentary analysis. Generally, the findings show that the concept of PPG has been minimal ly applied (15%) in the reviewed contemporary literature thus, suggesting it is still a relatively new field of study despite its initial use in the online literature in 2000. However, despite its minimal use, PPG offers key elements depict ing its reality. Moreover, PPG is conceived as a process and an academic framework and can be applied at the local, regional, national, and global levels. It faces conceptual stretching challenges, overlapping of its elements, and exclusion of its core values. To improve the literature, PPG must cover the scope of the public policy process and the notions of horizontal sharing of power, rules, principles, and norms among the networks of policy stakeholders, as well as ethics, elements of good governance, and instruments for PPG. Adequate debates and empirical exploration of the policy problems associated with the lack of good PPG are encouraged. To minimize the im pacts of PPG’s conceptual challenges, one needs to carefully select a few PPG’s arguments and variables that are measurable and relevant to the proposed study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public policy
• public policy governance
• participatory public policy
• new public governance
• new public management

Proje Numarası

1

Kaynakça

1. Abdullahi, D., Baba, Y., & Musa, A. (2016). Building innovative public institution. International Journal of Public Policy, 12 (3-6), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2016.079750
2. Abrucio, F., Vargas, F., & Grin, E. (2015, July 1-4). From Decentralisation to Federative Coordination: The Recent Path of Intergovernmental Relations in Brazil [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Public Policy, Milan, Italy. https://www.ippapublicpolicy.org/file/paper/1434043449.pdf
3. Akhyar, A., & Syarif, S. (2024). Tantangan dan Peluang Inovasi Kebijakan di Sektor Pariwisata Kabupaten Bima: Perspektif Good Public Policy Governance. Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 4(6), 832-843. 10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v4i6.324
4. Alwi, R., & Kasmad, R. (2014). Bureaucratic system VS People empowerment policy: empirical evidence cocoa farmer empowerment policy in south Sulawesi province, Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 313-326.
5. Andion, C., & Magalhães, T. (2021). (Re)approaching the pragmatisms of public policy analysis. Experimentation and public inquiry in a scenario of democratic crises. Revista Sociedade e Estado, 36 (2). doi: 10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020007
6. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 1–29
7. Assadi, M. (2013). Public Policy Initiative and Shifting Paradigm of Governance in the Context of Climatic Change: Experience from Karnataka State, India. JMSD
8. Badran, A. (2020). Public policy Governance from a Network Perspective. A theoretical Approach. https://hikama.dohainstitute.org/ar/Issue001/Pages/Hikama-01-2020-Badran.pdf

9. Bandeira, L., & Jr, E. (2019, June 26-28). Decision Heuristics, Governance and Public Policies’s Performance. [Paper presentation]. The 4th International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP4). Montréal. https://www.ippapublicpolicy.org/file/paper/5d023f2f87af1.pdf
10. Berman, E., & Karacaoglu, G. (2020), New Zealand: At the Frontiers of Public Policy Innovations. In E, Berman & G. Karacaoglu (Eds.), Public Policy and Governance Frontiers in New Zealand (Public Policy and Governance, Vol. 32, pp. 1-10), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2053-769720200000032020
11. Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351023948
12. Bo¨rzel, T.A. (1998). Organising Babylon-On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76 (2), 253-73.
13. Bojovic, A., Coric, V., & Visekruna, A. (2019). European Union External Conditionality and Serbia’s Regulatory Response. СПМ број, година 26, свеска 65, 233-253.
14. Bolay, J.C., Maričić T., & Zeković, S. (Eds.) (2018) A Support to Urban Development Process, Belgrade: EPFL & IAUS.
15. Bosomworth, K. (2011). Adaptive governance in fire management: Exploring the role of bureaucrats in reflexive learning [Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University].
16. Cabalu, H., Kenyon, P., Koshy, P., & Wills-Johnson, N. (2006). Governance structures for competition policy: a case study of the Philippines. The Philippine Review of Economics, 53 (2), 101-114. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/29091/20648_downloaded_stream_104.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
17. Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance (Vol. 1). Gee. https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf
18. Capano, G., Pritoni, A. (2020). Policy Cycle. In P. Harris., A. Bitonti., C. Fleisher., & A. Skorkjær Binderkrantz (eds), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_69-1
19. Carmel, E. (2017). ‘Bringing the social back in’: governance analysis as a mode of enquiry. In R. Paul., M. Molders., A. Bora., M. Huber & P. Munte (Eds.), Society, Regulation and Governance. New Models of Shaping Social Change?. Edward Elger Publishing. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438386
20. Carmel, E. (2019). Governance analysis: epistemological orientations and analytical framework. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. ProQuest EBook Central.
21. Chatanga, R., & Biljohn, M. (2023). New Public Governance Theory. A Framework for Lesotho Policy-makers to Enhance Community Participation during Climate Change Policy Formulation and Implementation. Administratio Publica, 31 (2), 1-24 https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/ejc-adminpub_v31_n2_a2
22. Chatzopoulou, S. (2019). The food policy of the European Union. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.595
23. Cheung, A. (2008). Interpreting East Asian social policy development: Paradigm shifts or policy ‘steadiness’? In K. Mok & R. Forrest (Eds.), Changing Governance and Public Policy in East Asia (1st ed., pp. 25-48). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888216
24. Compton, M., & Meier, K. (2017). Bureaucracy to post bureaucracy: The consequences of political failures. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.127.
25. Conteh, C. (2010). The Challenges of Economic Development Policy Governance in Developing Countries: The Case of Botswana. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 31 (3/4), 401-416.
26. Conteh, C. (2011a). Public management in an age of complexity: regional economic development in Canada. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25 (6/7), 464-472. doi:10.1108/09513551211260649.
27. Conteh, C. (2011b). Balancing resilience and adaptability: regional development policy governance in Northern Ontario and Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 34 (2-3), 69-80.
28. Conteh, C. (2012a). Managing Canada’s Rural Regions in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 7 (3), 204–222.
29. Conteh, C. (2012b). Managing intergovernmental contracts: The Canada–Manitoba cooperation on regional economic development. Canadian Public Administration, 55(2), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00217.x
30. Conteh, C. (2013a). Policy Governance in Multi-Level Systems: Economic Development and Policy Implementation in Canada. Canada: McGill-Queen’s Press.
31. Conteh, C. (2013b). Policy Governance in Complex Multi-Level Systems: Innovation Management in Canada. In D. Cepiku., D. Jesuit & I. Roberge (Eds.), Making Multi-Level Public Management Work: Stories of Success and Failure from Europe and North America Public Administration and Public Policy (pp. 85- 98). London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14752
32. Costa, A., & Mertens, F. (2015). Governance, networks and social capital in the plenary of the Brazilian national council on water resources. Ambiente & Sociedade, 18 (3), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC865V1832015
33. de la Porte, C., & Heins, E. (2017). The Aftermath of the Eurozone Crisis: Towards Fiscal Federalism? In D. Dinan, N. Nugent, & W. E. Paterson (Eds.), The European Union in Crisis (pp. 149-166). Palgrave Macmillan. De Leeuw, E., & Harris, P. (2022). Governance and Policies for Settings-Based Work. In S. Kokko & M. Baybutt (Eds.). Handbook of Settings-Based Health Promotion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95856-5_3
34. DeDominicis, B. (2017). Climate Change, Global Interdependence and Bargaining Leverage: A Classical Realist Critique of Why South Korea Adopted a Carbon Cap and Trade System. Global Journal of Business Research, 11(1), 13-34.
35. Denters, D., & Rose, L. (2005). Comparing Local Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Demirag, I. (2004). Towards Better Governance and Accountability: Exploring the Relationships between the Public, Private and the Community: Introduction. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 15, 19–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jcorpciti.15.19
36. Dufour, P., Labelle, A., & Leboucher, M. (2021). Higher education regimes and social protest: the case of contentious student politics in France (2005–2016). French Politics, 19, 347- 372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-020-00141-
37. Eddington, N., & Eddington, I. (2008, 10-11 May 2008). Public Policy Interventions and Sustainability: Complex Stakeholder Environments. [Paper presentation]. Conference on Environmental Governance and Democracy, New Haven, United States. https://research.usq.edu.au/item/9yw97/public-policy-interventions-and-sustainability-complex-stakeholder-environments
38. Edinova, M. (2016). Ethnic communities: to be or not to be involved. Вестник СПбГУ. Сер. 6. Вып. 4. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2016.406
39. Ermolaeva, E. (2021). Assessing the Management Component of Technical Potential. Russian Engineering Research. 41, 980–982. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X21100075
40. Freeman, B. (2014, 31 October). Policy practitioners: front-loading the policy cycle Lessons from the United States, New Zealand, and Papua New Guinea. [Paper presentation]. ATEM Policy Development Forum. Deakin University Melbourne.
41. Froener, C., & Lima, L. (2023). Participatorny councils as spaces of governance of urban policies. InterAção, 14 (3), 1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797583862
42. Fu, G. (2021). From bottom-up to top-down: goverance, institutionalisation, and innovation in Chinese makerspaces. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1950680
43. Fukuda, K. (2015). Accountability and the Governance of Food Safety Policy in the EU and Japan. In P. Bacon., H. Mayer and H. Nakamura (Eds.). The European Union and Japan. A New Chapter in Civilian Power Cooperation? (1st Ed). London: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616445.
44. Glover, L., & Granberg, M. (2020). Adaptation Politics in Context: Governance and Sustainability. In: The Politics of Adapting to Climate Change. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46205-5_4
45. Gupta, K., Ripberger, J., Fox, A., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Silva, C. (2022). Discourse network analysis of nuclear narratives. In M. D. Jones, M. K. McBeth, and E. A. Shanahan (eds.), Narratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework, M., Montana State University Library, 13-39. DOI: doi.org/10.15788/npf2
46. Hanusch, H. (2010). Fighting the Crisis: Public Sector Governance in a Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian System. Homo Oeconomicus, 27(1/2), 89-104.
47. Harris, P., Kent, J., Sainsbury, P., Riley, E., Sharma, N., & Harris, E. (2020). Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia. Health promotion international, 35(4), 649-660. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz056
48. Hendriks, C. (2011). Worlds Apart or Connected? Interest Advocacy and Public Deliberation. In: The Politics of Public Deliberation: Citizens Engagement and Interest Advocacy (pp. 17-40). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347564_2
49. Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, Toronto, Oxford University Press.
50. Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Koppenjan, J. (2017). Policy learning and policy networks in theory and practice: the role of policy brokers in the Indonesian biodiesel policy network. Policy and Society, 36(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1321230.
51. Huang, T., & Huang, Q. (2023). Research on Agricultural and Rural Public Governance and Sustainable Development: Evidence from 2350 Data. Sustainability, 15(10), 7876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107876
52. Hux, C.T. (2017). Use of specialists on audit engagements: A research synthesis and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39(1), 23-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2017.07.001
53. Ihsan, A., & Andiansyah, F. (2023). Fiscal Policy in the Spectrum As-Shari’ah Maqashid: Study of Al-Syatibi Thinking in the Book of Al-Muwafaqat. Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Studies. 8 (1), 75-85.
54. Irtyshcheva, I., Pavlenko, O., Boiko, Y., Stehnei, M., Kramarenko, I., Hryshyna, N., & Ishchenko, O. (2022). Evaluation of the efficiency of regional public governance in the context of achieving goals of sustainable development. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 44(4), 497-505. doi: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.49
55. Jelinčić, D. (2017). Organisation of Public Policy Models: A Way Forward. In: Innovations in Culture and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52721-5_6
56. Jessop, B. (2020). Locating the WISERD Project: Public policy governance towards common good. In Putting Civil Society in Its Place: Governance, Meta governance and Subjectivity (pp. 103-124). Bristol, UK: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447354970-011
57. Jóhannesson, G., & Bærenholdt, J. (2020). Actor-Network Theory. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 33-40). Elsevier. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10621-3
58. Junior, N., & Shimizu, H. (2016). Theoretical reflections on governance in health regions. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 22(4), 1085-1095. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017224.30532016. Retrieved from: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/csc/2017.v22n4/1085-1095/en
59. Kaiser, T. (2014). New forms of governance in the transnational cooperations. Studies. 53-60. https://real.mtak.hu/92578/7/tamas-kaiser_new-forms-of-governance-in-the-transnational-cooperations.original.pdf
60. Kapilima, V. (2020). The Impact of Power and Power Relationships in the Public Policy Formulation Process: A Case Study of the Formulation Process of 2014 Tanzania’s Education and Training Policy. Open Political Science, 3(1), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2020-0020
61. Khundrakpam, P., & Sarmah, J. (2024). Comparative political theory and Gandhi: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100887
62. Kirschbaum, C. (2018). Shifts in control disciplines and rescaling as a response to network governance failure: the BCJ case, Brazil. In How Does Collaborative Governance Scale? (pp. 157-176). Bristol, UK: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447340560.ch008
63. Klimowicz, M., & Kubiak, M. (2023). Senior Citizens’ Councils from the Perspective of Public Governance in Poland. Studia Iuridica, Uniwersytet Warszawski, 99, 460-476, DOI:10.31338/2544-3135.si.2024-99.26
64. Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., & Virtanen, P. (2020). Mission-oriented public policy and the new evaluation culture. In H. Lehtimäki., P. Uusikylä & A. Smedlund (Eds.). Society as an Interaction Space: A Systemic Approach. Translational Systems Sciences, Vol. 22. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0069-5_4
65. Lasswell, H. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66. Lasswell, H. (1956). The decision process. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
67. Lasswell, H. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
68. Leifeld, P. (2013). Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework: A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics: Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the ACF. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007
69. Leifeld, P. (2016). Policy debates as dynamic networks: German pension politics and privatization discourse. Campus Verlag.
70. Low, B., Tang, Y., & Medhekar, M. (2012). Green power electricity, public policy and disjointed incrementalism. Journal of Business Research, 65 (6), 802-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.019
71. Maia, A., & Marques, T. (2019). Collaborative processes and spatial planning: the national spatial planning policy in Portugal. In Planning for transition: book of papers/Venice AESOP Annual Congress. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/125460/2/369727.pdf
72. Mair, P. (1992). Explaining the Absence of Class Politics in Ireland. In J. Goldthorpe & C. Whelan (Eds.), The Development of Industrial Society in Ireland. British Academy and Oxford University Press, New York, 395. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4018/79p383.pdf
73. Malcolm, J. (2007). Recommendations for the Internet Governance Forum [Unpublished manuscript]. https://igf.wgig.org/igf/Substantive_2nd_IGF/Malcolm_Recommandations_for_the_IGF.pdf
74. Malcolm, J. (2008). Multi-Stakeholder Public Policy Governance and Its Application to the Internet Forum Governance [PhD Thesis, University of Murdoch University].
75. Marsden, C. (2008). Embedding Corporate Responsibility in the MBA Curriculum. United Kingdom: Cranfield University.
76. McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2009). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acref/9780199207800.001.0001
77. McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2012). Nodal Governance: The Diffusion of Power in Global Forest Governance Networks. In S. Guzzini., I. Neumann (Eds.), The Diffusion of Power in Global Governance. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283559_4
78. Meijer, A. J., Lips, M., & Chen, K. (2019). Open Governance: A New Paradigm for Understanding Urban Governance in an Information Age. Frontiers of Sustainable Cities, 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2019.00003
79. Mok, K. (2007). Withering The State? Globalisation Challenges and Changing Higher Education Governance in East Asia. In W. Pink & G. Noblit (Eds.), International Handbook of Urban Education (pp. 305-320). Springer.
80. Molokanova, V., Borodin, Y., & Tarasenko, T. (2020). Implementation of innovation management achievements in regional public governance practice. International Journal of Management, 11(9). doi: 10.34218/IJM.11.9.2020.058
81. Moreno, L. (2010). Welfare Mix, CSR and Social Citizenship [Working Paper, Number 5]. Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CCHS-CSIC. http: hdl.handle.net/10261/24406
82. Musiani, F. (2023). Internet governance. Matthew Clarke and Xinyu (Andy) Zhao (dir.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Development (pp. 390-394). ff10.4337/9781800372122.ch81ff. ffhal-04261051.
83. Nani, Y., Abdussamad, Z., & Tohopi, R. (2023). NPA, the New Paradigm of Public Service Overview of Public Policy Implementation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Democracy and Social Transformation (ICON-DEMOST), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 793, https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-174-6_25
84. Nyariki, D., Sanginga, P., Yemshaw, Y., & Kakuru, W. (2010). Policy and Governance in Natural Resource Management. In W. Ochola., P. Sanginga & I. Bekalo (Eds.). Managing Natural Resources for Development in Africa: A Resource Book. Kenya: University of Nairobi.
85. Oinarov, A., Eshimova, D., & Adilbekova, B. (2017). Public policy on public-private project financing in Kazakhstan. Journal of Asian Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2017.1396951
86. Okudolo, I., & Ojakorotu, V. (2022). Promoting Disabled Persons’ Belongingness in Elite Circles of Nigerian Public Administration Setups: Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 10 (1), 43-55.
87. Omololu, A. (2017). How Does Government-Sponsored Participation Influence Public Policy? An Evaluation of the Remediation Efforts at Fort George G. Meade and the Aberdeen Proving Ground [Doctoral dissertation, University of Baltimore]. https://mdsoar.org/items/f659f1b3-c1e8-4fe1-875f-c4642ad52574
88. Osborne, S. (Ed.). (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. USA: Routledge.
89. O’Toole Jr., L. (2007). Inter-organisational relations in implementation. In B. Guy Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.) Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 142-152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
90. Paliwang, Z., Jompa, J., Ibrahim, A., & Haning, T. (2023). Innovative Policy for Socio-Economic Development in Nunukan’s Coastal Border Communities, North Kalimantan. KnE Social Sciences, 8(17), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14177
91. Pascoe, K., Waterhouse-Bradley, B., & McGinn, T. (2023). Social Workers’ Experiences of Bureaucracy: A Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. British Journal of Social Work, 53, 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac106
92. Peou, S. (2023). Global Public Governance: Toward World Government? Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811257872_0007.
93. Pérez, V. & Orlando, E. (2021). Introduction to Special Section on Climate Change Litigation. German Law Journal, 22, 1387–1392. doi:10.1017/glj.2021.92
94. Phillips, R. (2006). The Role of Non-profit Advocacy Organizations in Australian Democracy and Policy Governance. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 17 (1), 59-75. doi: 10.1007/s11266-005-9004-y
95. Quick, K. S., & Bryson, J. (2016). Theories of public participation in governance. In T. Jacob & C. Ansell (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar.
96. Rashidi, K., & Patt, A. (2018). Subsistence over symbolism: the role of transnational municipal networks on cities’ climate policy innovation and adoption. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23, 507-523
97. Rawhani, C. (2016). Collaboration: a theory of governance grounded in deconstructing South Africa’s sanitation policy [Master’s thesis, University of the Witwatersrand] http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/21772
98. Reid, H., Alam, M., Berger, R., Cannon, T., Huq, S., & Milligan, A. (2009). Community-based adaptation to climate change: An overview. In H. Reid, T. Cannon, R. Berger, M. Alam, & A. Milligan (Eds.), Community-based adaptation to climate change (pp. 11–33). Participatory Learning 60. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
99. Rivera, J., Oetzel, J., De Leon, P., & Starik, M. (2009). Business Responses to Environmental and Social Protection Policies: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Policy Sciences. 42, 3–32. DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9078-2.
100. Rodriguez, A., Deane, K., & Davis, C. (2022). Towards a Framework of Racialized Policymaking in Higher Education. In L. Perna (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76660-3_2
101. Salih, M. (2009). Governance of Food Security in the 21st Century. In H. Brauch, et al. Facing Global Environmental Change. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68488-6_34
102. Sancino, A., & Schindele, I. (2022). From Public Value to Public Value Co-Creation. In Public Value Co-Creation (pp. 7-20). Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-961-620221004
103. Schram, A., Friel, S., VanDuzer, J., Ruckert, A., & Labonte, R. (2018). Internalisation of International Investment Agreements in Public Policymaking: Developing a Conceptual Framework of Regulatory Chill. Global Policy, 9 (2), 193-202. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12545
104. Seifert, J., Alberto, C., Walter, T., & Nicolodi, J. (2012, September, 17-20). The environmental public policy context in the prevention and control aspects of oil incidents for the exploration and production phases in Brazil [Paper presentation]. Rio Oil & Gas Expo and Conference. Rio de Janeiro. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/22076148.
105. Senn, J. (2000). Business-to-business e-commerce. Information Systems Management, 17(2), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43191.17.2.20000301/31224.3
106. Shearer, J., Abelson, J., Kouyate, B., Lavis, J., & Walt, G. (2016). Why do policies change? Institutions, interests, ideas and networks in three cases of policy reform. Health policy and planning, 31 (9), 1200-1211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czw052
107. Smorgunov, L. (2017). Participatory Public Policy and Inclusive Growth in the BRICS. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143699.3143709
108. Stanica, C., & Aristigueta, M. (2019). Progress toward New Public Governance in Romania. International Journal of Public Leadership. 15(3), 189-206. doi 10.1108/IJPL-01-2019-0004.
109. Stead, D. (2013). Dimensions of territorial governance, Planning Theory & Practice, 14 (1),142-147. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.758494.
110. Stezano, F. (2018). The role of technology centers as intermediary organisations facilitating links for innovation: Four cases of federal technology centers in Mexico. Review of Policy Research, 35(4), 642-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12293
111. Sururi, A. (2017). Innovation of Policy in Public Administration Perspective toward the realisation of Good Public Policy Governance. Spirit Publik, 12, 14 – 31. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/spirit-publik/article/viewFile/16236/13050
112. Sururi, A. (2019). Inovasi Kebijakan Organisasi Sektor Publik Menuju Terwujudnya Good Public Policy Governance. Jurnal Good Governance, 15 (1), 85- 96.
113. Susilo, Y., Prasojo, E., & Jannah, L. (2023). Fragmented Institutions in Promoting Investment in Indonesia: Does Interactive Governance Make a Difference? Economics and Business Quarterly Reviews, 6 (2), 109-120. doi: 10.31014/aior.1992.06.02.512
114. Syawal, A. (2023). Network Governance in the Implementation of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land Protection Policy in Makassar City. KnE Social Sciences, 8(17), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14099
115. Te Hiwi, B. (2014). “What is the spirit of this gathering?” Indigenous sport policy-makers and self-determination in Canada. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(4). doi: 10.18584/iipj.2014.5.4.6 Terry, G. (2009). No climate justice without gender justice: An overview of the issues. Gender & Development, 17(1), 5–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27809203
116. Touré, Y., & Chatelin, C. (2022, June). Deciding beyond crises: Corrective anticipation through multi-science knowledge in public policy governance. In Colloque Association Politiques et Management publics, CNAM LIRSA, PARIS, France. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04301132/document.
117. Tricker, B. (2019). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. USA: Oxford University Press.
118. UNESCAP. (2009). What is Good Governance? Thailand: Poverty Reduction Section, UNESCAP. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf.
119. Yinan, R., & Zaijin, Z. (2014). Analysis on the Regional Public Governance Path under the View of Corporation Network. International Integration for Regional Public Management. Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/icpm-14.2014.31
120. Zheng, X., Huang, M., Wang, Y., & Wang, T. (2015). A Research on Area-Based Urban Governance by Public Participation. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Forum on Urban., C010, doi:10.3390/ifou- C010.
121. Zhihong, Z. & Xiaoying, Z. (2013). Fragmentation and Unity of Rural Public Governance: A Case Study on Lin’an City in China. Canadian Social Science, 9(6), 57.
122. Zhixiong, M. (2017). Rural Public Governance and Public Service in Chengdu: Practice and Thoughts. Comparative Studies On Vertical Administrative Reforms in China and Germany, 227. https://dopus.uni-speyer.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1268/file/FB-285.pdf#page=239