THE TENDENCIES OF DECREASING THE INVESTING ACTIVITIES AND THE NUMBER OF JOBS IN GEORGIA AT THE BACKGROUND OF INCREASING ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Öz
We have heard several times recently the Government of Georgia declaring the” two-digit economical rise which is unprecented all over the world” (12,7% in six months) which has resulted in changing the depressive background and nihilistic thinking in the country. Surely, such progress must be reflected in the well-being of the population. But what to do with the increased inflation which is much more perceptible by population than “rushing” of Georgian economy? This growth of inflation is explained by our economists as the result of wrong economic policy. As for the promises given by the National Bank in the beginning of the year 2021, about controlling the inflation and reaching the aiming results at the end of the year, they remained only as pure promises.
In order the growth of economy becomes perceptible for our population, it is necessary to lower the inflation rate to one digit, namely the best would be lower than 6% rate and if at the same time the two digital economic growth will be retained, this would be notable for the population of the country in 2022.
Active participation of Georgia in international division of labor, larger and more stable positioning of Georgian products on the World's trade map are the results of successful realization of economical reforms and state programs of the business support in the country.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. 1. Mincer, J. (1997). “Changes in Wage Inequality, 1970-1990.” Research in Labor Economics. New York;
- 2. Deschênes, O. (2006). Unobserved ability, comparative advantage, and the rising return to college in the United States, 1979-2002, Galifornia (UC SANTA BARBARA);
- 3. Murphy, K., Welch, F. (1989). Wage Premiums for College Graduates. Recent Growth and Possible Explanations. Educational Researcher, volume: 18 issue: 4, American Educational Research Association, Chicago;
- 4. Katz, L., Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1,Washington;
- 5. Mincer, J. (1991). Education and unemployment (No. w3838). National bureau of economic research. Massachusetts;
- 6. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 40, no. 1, New York;
- 7. Frey, C. B., Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Volume 114,OREBRO UUNIVERSITET;
- 8. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P. and Dewhurst, M. (January, 2017). Harnessing automation for a future that works. McKinsey Quarterly, MCKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE, San Francisco;
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Ekonomi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
26 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi
8 Kasım 2021
Kabul Tarihi
10 Aralık 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2021 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 52