Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE TENDENCIES OF DECREASING THE INVESTING ACTIVITIES AND THE NUMBER OF JOBS IN GEORGIA AT THE BACKGROUND OF INCREASING ECONOMIC INDICATORS

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 52, 103 - 117, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1034096

Öz

We have heard several times recently the Government of Georgia declaring the” two-digit economical rise which is unprecented all over the world” (12,7% in six months) which has resulted in changing the depressive background and nihilistic thinking in the country. Surely, such progress must be reflected in the well-being of the population. But what to do with the increased inflation which is much more perceptible by population than “rushing” of Georgian economy? This growth of inflation is explained by our economists as the result of wrong economic policy. As for the promises given by the National Bank in the beginning of the year 2021, about controlling the inflation and reaching the aiming results at the end of the year, they remained only as pure promises.
In order the growth of economy becomes perceptible for our population, it is necessary to lower the inflation rate to one digit, namely the best would be lower than 6% rate and if at the same time the two digital economic growth will be retained, this would be notable for the population of the country in 2022.
Active participation of Georgia in international division of labor, larger and more stable positioning of Georgian products on the World's trade map are the results of successful realization of economical reforms and state programs of the business support in the country.

Kaynakça

  • 1. 1. Mincer, J. (1997). “Changes in Wage Inequality, 1970-1990.” Research in Labor Economics. New York;
  • 2. Deschênes, O. (2006). Unobserved ability, comparative advantage, and the rising return to college in the United States, 1979-2002, Galifornia (UC SANTA BARBARA);
  • 3. Murphy, K., Welch, F. (1989). Wage Premiums for College Graduates. Recent Growth and Possible Explanations. Educational Researcher, volume: 18 issue: 4, American Educational Research Association, Chicago;
  • 4. Katz, L., Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1,Washington;
  • 5. Mincer, J. (1991). Education and unemployment (No. w3838). National bureau of economic research. Massachusetts;
  • 6. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 40, no. 1, New York;
  • 7. Frey, C. B., Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Volume 114,OREBRO UUNIVERSITET;
  • 8. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P. and Dewhurst, M. (January, 2017). Harnessing automation for a future that works. McKinsey Quarterly, MCKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE, San Francisco;
  • 9. United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics Report. <https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm> (05.08.2018), Washington;
  • 10. Eurostat. (2018). Unemployment rates of the population aged 25-64 by educational attainment level. <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tps00066>(05.08.2018), Brüksel;
  • 11. Lemieux, T. (2006). "Postsecondary Education And Increasing Wage Inequality," American Economic Review, v96 (2,May), Massey University of New Zealand;
  • 12. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F. (2007). “Long-Run Changes in the Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, Brookings (USA);
  • 13. Bichia Q. (2018). ,,The danger of degradation of education system and labor market in the case of misaligned motivations”; International Scientific-Practical Journal - ,, Globalization and Business“, №6, Tiflis;
  • 14. https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/35/external-trade
  • 15. https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/683/Employment-Unemployment

ТЕНДЕНЦИИ ИНВЕСТИЦИЙ И СОЗДАНИЯ РАБОЧИХ МЕСТ В ГРУЗИИ НА ФОНЕ РОСТА ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ ПОКАЗАТЕЛЕЙ

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 52, 103 - 117, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1034096

Öz

В последнее время правительство Грузии часто заявляет, что у нас «беспрецедентный» двузначный экономический рост (12,7% за 6 месяцев), и что это изменило депрессивный фон и нигилистическое отношение населения в стране. Экономический рост также должен отражаться на благосостоянии населения, но как насчет роста инфляции, которую население воспринимает сильнее, чем “брожение” экономики? Эксперты объясняют рост инфляции неправильной экономической политикой. Обещание Нацбанка, объявившего в начале 2021 года о том, что инфляция достигнет минимума и к концу года страна приблизится к целевому показателю, остается в хорошем настроении.
Чтобы наше население так или иначе воспринимало экономический рост, инфляция должна снизиться как минимум до однозначной отметки, а в лучшем случае - ниже 6% ... и если мы сохраним двузначный экономический рост, к 2022 году. население это уже почувствует.
Активное участие Грузии в международном разделении труда, более широкое и прочное позиционирование грузинской продукции на карте мировой торговли является результатом успешной реализации экономических реформ и государственных программ поддержки бизнеса в стране в последние годы.

Kaynakça

  • 1. 1. Mincer, J. (1997). “Changes in Wage Inequality, 1970-1990.” Research in Labor Economics. New York;
  • 2. Deschênes, O. (2006). Unobserved ability, comparative advantage, and the rising return to college in the United States, 1979-2002, Galifornia (UC SANTA BARBARA);
  • 3. Murphy, K., Welch, F. (1989). Wage Premiums for College Graduates. Recent Growth and Possible Explanations. Educational Researcher, volume: 18 issue: 4, American Educational Research Association, Chicago;
  • 4. Katz, L., Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1,Washington;
  • 5. Mincer, J. (1991). Education and unemployment (No. w3838). National bureau of economic research. Massachusetts;
  • 6. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 40, no. 1, New York;
  • 7. Frey, C. B., Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Volume 114,OREBRO UUNIVERSITET;
  • 8. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P. and Dewhurst, M. (January, 2017). Harnessing automation for a future that works. McKinsey Quarterly, MCKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE, San Francisco;
  • 9. United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics Report. <https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm> (05.08.2018), Washington;
  • 10. Eurostat. (2018). Unemployment rates of the population aged 25-64 by educational attainment level. <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tps00066>(05.08.2018), Brüksel;
  • 11. Lemieux, T. (2006). "Postsecondary Education And Increasing Wage Inequality," American Economic Review, v96 (2,May), Massey University of New Zealand;
  • 12. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F. (2007). “Long-Run Changes in the Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, Brookings (USA);
  • 13. Bichia Q. (2018). ,,The danger of degradation of education system and labor market in the case of misaligned motivations”; International Scientific-Practical Journal - ,, Globalization and Business“, №6, Tiflis;
  • 14. https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/35/external-trade
  • 15. https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/683/Employment-Unemployment

EKONOMİK VERİLERİN BÜYÜMESİ IŞIĞINDA GÜRCİSTAN'A YAPILAN YATIRIM SÜRECİ VE İŞ OLANAKLARI

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 52, 103 - 117, 26.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1034096

Öz

Son zamanlarda, Gürcistan hükümeti tarafından sık sık "benzeri görülmemiş" çift haneli bir ekonomik büyümeye (6 ayda %12,7) sahip olduğumuzu ve bunun ülkedeki nüfusun depresif geçmişini ve nihilist tutumunu değiştirdiğini açıklamaktadır. Ekonomik büyüme aynı zamanda nüfusun refahına da yansımalıdır, ancak nüfusun ekonomik durumu yine de fena durumda ve artan enflasyon da kendini her gün göstermektedir. Uzmanlar enflasyondaki artışı yanlış ekonomi politikalarına bağlıyor. 2021'in başlarında enflasyonun asgari seviyeye düşeceği ve ülkenin yılsonuna kadar hedefe yaklaşacağını açıklayan Merkez Bankası'nın verdiği söz iyimserliğini koruyor.
Nüfusumuzun bir şekilde ekonomik büyüme gidişatını algılaması için, enflasyonun en az tek haneli bir seviyeye ve en iyi ihtimalle % 6'nın altına inmesi gerekiyor. Eğer ekonomik büyüme çift haneli olarak sürdürülürse 2022'ye kadar halk bu durumun yansımalarını görecektir.
Gürcistan'ın uluslararası işbölümüne aktif katılımı, Gürcü ürünlerinin dünya ticaret haritasında daha geniş ve daha sağlam konumlandırılması, son yıllarda ülkede ekonomik reformların ve devlet işletme destek programlarının başarılı bir şekilde uygulanmasının sonucudur.
Enflasyon, nüfusun ve özellikle düşük ve sabit gelirli insanların refahını doğrudan etkiler. Bununla karşı karşıya kalan sadece yoksullar değil, hemen hemen her aileyi etkileyen sosyal bir sorundur. Bu şartlar altında, insanların kendilerini güvende hissetmeleri için tek yol, gelir artış hızının enflasyondan daha yüksek olması gerektiğidir. Sadece bu durumda katlanılabilir olacak ve nüfus için daha az yük olacaktır.

Kaynakça

  • 1. 1. Mincer, J. (1997). “Changes in Wage Inequality, 1970-1990.” Research in Labor Economics. New York;
  • 2. Deschênes, O. (2006). Unobserved ability, comparative advantage, and the rising return to college in the United States, 1979-2002, Galifornia (UC SANTA BARBARA);
  • 3. Murphy, K., Welch, F. (1989). Wage Premiums for College Graduates. Recent Growth and Possible Explanations. Educational Researcher, volume: 18 issue: 4, American Educational Research Association, Chicago;
  • 4. Katz, L., Murphy, K. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 1,Washington;
  • 5. Mincer, J. (1991). Education and unemployment (No. w3838). National bureau of economic research. Massachusetts;
  • 6. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 40, no. 1, New York;
  • 7. Frey, C. B., Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Volume 114,OREBRO UUNIVERSITET;
  • 8. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P. and Dewhurst, M. (January, 2017). Harnessing automation for a future that works. McKinsey Quarterly, MCKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE, San Francisco;
  • 9. United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics Report. <https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm> (05.08.2018), Washington;
  • 10. Eurostat. (2018). Unemployment rates of the population aged 25-64 by educational attainment level. <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tps00066>(05.08.2018), Brüksel;
  • 11. Lemieux, T. (2006). "Postsecondary Education And Increasing Wage Inequality," American Economic Review, v96 (2,May), Massey University of New Zealand;
  • 12. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F. (2007). “Long-Run Changes in the Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, Brookings (USA);
  • 13. Bichia Q. (2018). ,,The danger of degradation of education system and labor market in the case of misaligned motivations”; International Scientific-Practical Journal - ,, Globalization and Business“, №6, Tiflis;
  • 14. https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/35/external-trade
  • 15. https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/683/Employment-Unemployment
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Davit Bidzinashvili 0000-0002-2311-4110

Yayımlanma Tarihi 26 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Kasım 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Sayı: 52

Kaynak Göster

APA Bidzinashvili, D. (2021). THE TENDENCIES OF DECREASING THE INVESTING ACTIVITIES AND THE NUMBER OF JOBS IN GEORGIA AT THE BACKGROUND OF INCREASING ECONOMIC INDICATORS. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 1(52), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1034096