Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

RETHINKING ALTHUSSER: DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM, IDEOLOGY, AND KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN CONTEMPORARY THEORY

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 66, 98 - 111, 24.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1658727

Öz

This article explores the enduring relevance of Louis Althusser's dialectical materialism, particularly his theory of ideology and the philosophy of science in contemporary debates within social theory. Drawing on Althusser’s key works, including For Marx (1970) and Reading Capital (1970), as well as recent critical interpretations, this study examines how Althusser’s materialist philosophy provides a framework for understanding the production of knowledge and the role of ideology in shaping both scientific and social structures. The article argues that Althusser’s conceptualization of science as a “theoretical practice” is central to understanding the dynamics of scientific revolutions amd offers a materialist alternative to humanist interpretations of Marxism. By synthesizing Althusser’s work with contemporary discussions in the philosophy of science, the article highlights the applicability of Althusser’s dialectics to modern scientific and social theory. Additionally, it explores Althusser’s contributions to the understanding of class struggle and subjectivity in knowledge production and asserts that his ideas continue to inform critical theory’s engagement with the complex relationships between structure, agency, and ideology. This article ultimately seeks to reaffirm Althusser’s position as a pivotal figure in the development of Marxist theory and philosophy and offers a robust framework for analyzing the intersection of science, ideology, and social change.

Kaynakça

  • Althusser, L. (1970). For Marx. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  • Althusser, L., & Balibar, É. (1970). Reading Capital. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Assiter, A. (1984). Althusser and structuralism. The British Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1984.tb00104.x
  • El Hassan, I. S. (1986). Consciousness and ideology: A critique of Lukács, Althusser, and Poulantzas. Dialectical Anthropology, 11(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147826
  • Gordy, M. (1983). Reading Althusser: Time and the social whole. History and Theory, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505233
  • Schwartzman, D. W. (1975). Althusser, dialectical materialism and the philosophy of science. Science & Society, 39(3), 318–330. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40401861
  • Sprinker, M. (1985). Politics and theory: Althusser and Sartre. MLN, 100(5), 989–1011. https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.1985.0019
  • Stewart, A. (2008). Althusser's structuralism and a theory of class. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 36(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017600802434524
  • Stolze, T. (1998). Deleuze and Althusser: Flirting with structuralism. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 10(3), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935699808685540

RETHINKING ALTHUSSER: DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM, IDEOLOGY, AND KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN CONTEMPORARY THEORY

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 66, 98 - 111, 24.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1658727

Öz

This article explores the enduring relevance of Louis Althusser's dialectical materialism, particularly his theory of ideology and the philosophy of science in contemporary debates within social theory. Drawing on Althusser’s key works, including For Marx (1970) and Reading Capital (1970), as well as recent critical interpretations, this study examines how Althusser’s materialist philosophy provides a framework for understanding the production of knowledge and the role of ideology in shaping both scientific and social structures. The article argues that Althusser’s conceptualization of science as a “theoretical practice” is central to understanding the dynamics of scientific revolutions amd offers a materialist alternative to humanist interpretations of Marxism. By synthesizing Althusser’s work with contemporary discussions in the philosophy of science, the article highlights the applicability of Althusser’s dialectics to modern scientific and social theory. Additionally, it explores Althusser’s contributions to the understanding of class struggle and subjectivity in knowledge production and asserts that his ideas continue to inform critical theory’s engagement with the complex relationships between structure, agency, and ideology. This article ultimately seeks to reaffirm Althusser’s position as a pivotal figure in the development of Marxist theory and philosophy and offers a robust framework for analyzing the intersection of science, ideology, and social change.

Kaynakça

  • Althusser, L. (1970). For Marx. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  • Althusser, L., & Balibar, É. (1970). Reading Capital. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
  • Assiter, A. (1984). Althusser and structuralism. The British Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1984.tb00104.x
  • El Hassan, I. S. (1986). Consciousness and ideology: A critique of Lukács, Althusser, and Poulantzas. Dialectical Anthropology, 11(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147826
  • Gordy, M. (1983). Reading Althusser: Time and the social whole. History and Theory, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505233
  • Schwartzman, D. W. (1975). Althusser, dialectical materialism and the philosophy of science. Science & Society, 39(3), 318–330. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40401861
  • Sprinker, M. (1985). Politics and theory: Althusser and Sartre. MLN, 100(5), 989–1011. https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.1985.0019
  • Stewart, A. (2008). Althusser's structuralism and a theory of class. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 36(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017600802434524
  • Stolze, T. (1998). Deleuze and Althusser: Flirting with structuralism. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 10(3), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935699808685540
Toplam 10 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sistematik Felsefe (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Can Büyükbay 0009-0007-2013-8188

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 22 Haziran 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 5 Haziran 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 66

Kaynak Göster

APA Büyükbay, C. (2025). RETHINKING ALTHUSSER: DIALECTICAL MATERIALISM, IDEOLOGY, AND KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN CONTEMPORARY THEORY. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi(66), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1658727