Öğrenci Özerkliği ile Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 114 - 125, 20.06.2017

Nuray Okumuş Ceylan

Öz

Kocaeli Üniversitesi’nde 4 başlangıç ve 4 orta seviyesindeki İngilizce öğrenen dil öğrencileriyle yürütülen bu nicel çalışmanın amacı öğrencilerin öğrenci özerklikleri seviyelerini ve dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımını belirlemektir. Çalışma ayrıca öğrenci özerkliği ve dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olup olmadığını bulmayı da hedeflemektedir. Bulgular öğrencilerin öğrenme sorumluluklarının yarısını aldığını ortaya koymuştur. Dil öğrenme stratejilerinin farkındadırlar ve bazen kullanmaktadırlar. Bu sonuç öğrenme süreçleri üzerinde sıkı bir kontrol sağlayamadıklarını göstermektedir. Veriler doğrultusunda, öğrenci özerkliği ve dil öğrenme stratejileri arasında bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır; buna göre, öğrenci ne kadar özerk olursa dil öğrenme sürecinde karşılaştığı sorunlarla baş etmek için o kadar dil öğrenme stratejisi kullanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğrenci Özerkliği, Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri, Strateji Kullanımı, Dil Öğrenme Süreci, Dil Öğrenme Yeterliliği

The Relationship between Learner Autonomy and Language Learning Strategies

Öz

This quantitative study is conducted at Kocaeli University English Preparatory School, Turkey with four B beginner/ elementary and four A pre-intermediate/ intermediate level classes to identify the level of students’ learner autonomy and their use of language learning strategies. It also aims to find out whether there is a relationship between their learner autonomy and strategy use. Findings indicate that students take half of the responsibility of their own learning. They are aware of the language learning strategies and sometimes use them; thus, they do not have strong control over their learning process. The data also shows that there is a relation between learner autonomy and language learning strategy use; the more the students autonomous are the more language learning strategies they employ to cope with the difficulties they face in their language learning process

Anahtar Kelimeler

Learner Autonomy, Language Learning Strategies, Strategy Use, Language Learning Process, Language Learning Proficiency

Kaynakça

• Ablard, K. E. & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 94-101.
• Algan, N. (2006). The language learning strategies used by the university preparatory students and the instructors` awareness of their students` use of these strategies. Published MA Thesis, Marmara University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Alparda, Ç. (2010). The role of learner training in the effectiveness of CALL. Published MA Thesis, Bilkent University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Alptekin, C. (2007). Foreign Language Learning Strategy Choice: Naturalistic versus Instructed Language Acquisition. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3 (1): 4-11.
• Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English. Published MA Thesis, Middle East Technical University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Aydemir, U. V. (2007). Effects of the instruction of language learning strategies on students’ achievement in English teaching. Published MA Thesis, Uludağ University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Balkır, N. (2007). An investigation into the effects of learner training and awareness building activities on learners' perceptions of responsibility in learning English. Published MA Thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Bares, D. (1976) From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Bekleyen, N. (2005). İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarının Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Kullanımı. Retrieved on 28th July 2013, from http://www.academia.edu/487258/INGILIZCE_OGRETMEN_ADAYLARININ _DIL_OGRENME_STRATEJILERI_KULLANIMI
• Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Longman: London.
• Benson, P. (2003). Learner autonomy in the classroom. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 289-308). McGraw Hill: New York.
• Berger, P. & Luckman, T., (1971). Social construction of reality. Penguin University Books: London.
• Biggs, J.B. (1991). Teaching for Better Learning. Legal Education Review, 8; (1990- 91) 2 (1). Retrieved on 28th July 2013, from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals legedr2&div=12&id=&page=
• Biggs, J.B. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18 (1). Retrieved on 28th July2013,from http://www.tcd.ie/vpcao/academicdevelopment/assets/pdf/Biggs_1999_Teaching_for_enhanced_learning.pdf
• Candy, P. (1991). Self- direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. Jossey- Bass Publishers: San Francisco.
• Cephe, P. T. & Yeşilbursa, A. A. (2006). Language Learning Strategies of Turkish University EFL Students. Education and Science, 31(139), 80-85.
• Cesur, M. O. (2008). A model explaining and predicting the relationship between university prep class students' language learning strategies, learning styles and academic success in foreign language. Published PhD Thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Educational Sciences Institute.
• Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students‟ attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation and Research in Education, 16 (1), 1-18.
• Çoban, Z. (2002). Attitudes Towards Learner Autonomy in Gazi University and Yıldız Teknik University. Paper presented at the International INGED Conference on Interchanges and Exchanges: Current Trends in ELT, Metu, Ankara, Turkey.
• Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? IRAL, 41(4), 279–291.
• Cohen, A. D., (1992). The role of learner strategy training in ELT methodology. In A. Wongsothorn et al. (eds.), Explorations and innovations in ELT methodology. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Language Institute, 1992.
• Corno, L. & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18,88-08.
• Cotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. English Language Teaching Journal, 49(3), 219-227.
• Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54 (2), 09-117.
• Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English Proficiency. Professional Teaching Articles
• Dakin, J. (1973). The language laboratory and modern language teaching.
• Dam, L. (1990). Learner Autonomy in Practice: An experiment in learning and teaching. Autonomy in Language Learning. I. Gathercole (Ed). Great Britain. Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
• Dam, L. (1995). Learner Autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice, Dublin, Authentik.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. Plenium Press.: New York.
• Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dickinson, L. (1992). Talking shop: Aspects of autonomous learning, An interview with Leslie Dickinson. ELT Journal, 47 (1), 330-341.
• Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174.
• Doyal, L. & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need, Macmillan.
• Döner, A. (2005). Adult language learners` attitudes to the strategy training on vocabulary and reading in the classroom. Published Master’s, thesis, Uludağ University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Durgun, G. (2010). Effects of explicit metacognitive strategy training on reading comprehension, attitudes towards reading and strategy awareness, Karadeniz Technical University, Western Linguistics and Literature.
• Ehrman, M.E. & Oxford, R.L., 1991. Affective Survey. Unpublished manuscript.
• Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Eriksson, R. (1993). Teaching language learning: Inservice training for communicative teaching and self- directed learning in English as a foreign languageç Goteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 92. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Goteborg: Sweden.
• Esch, E. (1996). Promoting learner autonomy: Criteria for the selection of appropriate methods. In R. Pemberton, S.L.
• Edward, W.W.F. Or, and H.D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp. 35-48). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
• Entwistle, N.J (1981). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of Educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester: Wiley.
• Faerch, M. & Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman. Gagné, R.M. (1977). Conditions of Learning, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York.
• Gardner, D. & Miller, L. (1999). Establishing Self Access: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gökgöz, B. (2010). An investigation of learner autonomy and strategies for coping with speaking problems in relation to success in English speaking classes. Published MA Thesis, Middle East Technical University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Gremmo, M.J. and Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23, (2), 151-164.
• Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367- 383.
• Harri- Augstein, S. & Thomas, L.F. (1979) Self-organised learning and the relativity of knowing: towards a conversational methodology. In P.Stringer and D. Bannister (eds ). Constructs of Sociality and Individuality.Academic Press, London, 115-132.
• Haliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold: Sydney.
• Harding-Esch, E. (Ed.). (1976). Self-directed learning and autonomy. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge.
• Holec, H. (1979) Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Strasbourg, France: Council for Cultural Cooperation.
• Holec, H. (1980). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Nancy: Centre de Recherches et d'Applications Pedagogiques en Langues. Council of Europe.
• Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
• Holec, H. (1985). On autonomy: some elementary concepts. In P. Riley (Ed.), Discourse and learning (pp. 173-90). Longman: London.
• Holec, H. (1987). The learner as manager: managing learning or managing to learn? In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.). Learner strategies in Cambridge: Prentice-Hall.
• Holec, H. (Ed.). (1988). Autonomy and self-directed learning: Present fields of application. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
• Hounsell, D. (1997). Understanding Teaching and Teaching for Understanding in The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and studying in Higher Education, Ed. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N.,, pp. 238-257, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
• Huttunen, I. (1986). Learning to learn languages: investigating learner strategies and learner autonomy. Report on Workshop 2B. Council for Cultural Cooperation. Council of Europe. Strasbourg.
• İçmez, S., (2007). Learner Autonomy: What We Need To Foster And How. Retrieved on 28th July 2013, from http://egitim.cu.edu.tr/efdergi/download/2007.3.34.96.pdf
• Karabıyık, A. (2008). The Relationship Between Culture of Learning and Turkish University Preparatory Students’ Readiness for Learner Autonomy. MA Thesis; The Graduate School of Education of Bilkent University.
• Karatay, M. (2006). Turkish adult language learners' preferences in language learning strategies. Published MA Thesis. Uludağ University,Western Linguistics and Literature.
• Kohonen, V. , (1991). Foreign language learning as learner education: facilitating self- direction in language learning. Council of Europe Symposiım. Ruschlikong. Switzerland.
• Kennedy, J.(2002). Learner Autonomy: A Realistic Proposition for Turkish Students. In M. Monty and M. Godfrey (Eds.). Global Problems and Local Solutions. Proceedings of ELT Conference (pp.118-122). İstanbul: Işık University.
• Kucuroğlu, Ç. (2000). The Role of a Learner-Centered Approach in Language Teaching on the Development of Learner Autonomy: A Model Course Design. Doğuş University Journal, 1, 193-200.
• Lee, I. (1997) Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal, 52/4, October, Retrieved on 28th July 2013, from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/52/4/282.abstract
• Little, D. (1995). Leaning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.
• Little, D. (1996a). Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: promoting learner autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies. In R. Pemberton, S.L.
• Little, D. (1996b). The politics of learner autonomy. Learning Learning (newsletter of the JALT Learner Development
• N-SIG) 2(4), 7-10. Paper presented at the Fifth Nordic Workshop on Developing Autonomous Learning, 24-27 August 1995, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Little, D. (2002) Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: some steps along the way. Retrieved on 28th July 2013, from http://archive.ecml.at/mtp2/Elp_tt/Results/DM_layout/Reference%20Materials/English/David%20Little%20 Constructing%20a%20Theory%20of%20Learner%20Autonomy.pdf
• Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24/ 4/ 427- 435.
• Logan, S., & Moore, N., (2003). Implementing learner training from a teacher’s perspective. Proceedings of the Independent Learning Conference 2003. Published 20 September 2003.
• Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M. Stern, H. H. & Todesco, A. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education: Toronto, Ontario.
• Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2002). Identity and language learning. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 115-116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Nunan, D. (1996). Towards autonomous learning: Some theoretical, empirical and practical issues, Taking control: Autonomy in language learning, R, Pemberton, et al. Hong Kong University Press.
• Odacı, T. (2006) . The Effect of explicit listening comprehension strategy training on listening comprehension strategy use and listening proficiency level. Published Master’s, thesis, Anadolu University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Okumuş, N. (2009). Thoughts on Learner Autonomy in a Computer Assisted Language Learning Program. INGED Newsletter, 2009
• O’Malley, M. J., & Chamot, U. A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Oxford, L. R. (1990). Language learning strategies. Heinle & Heinle: Boston.
• Oxford, R. & Ehrman, M. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3). Retrieved on 6th November 2002, from http://imagesrvr.epnet.com/bllimages/ehost/
• Özdere, M. (2005). State-supported provincial university English language instructors’ attitudes towards learner autonomy. Published Master’s Thesis. Bilkent University. The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences. The Department of Teaching English as a Foreign Language.
• Pearson, P.D., & J.A. Doyle. (1987). Explicit Comprehension Instruction: A Review of the Research and a New Conceptualization of Instruction. Elementary School Journal, 18, 151-166.
• Pintrich, R. P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459- 470. Retrieved on 16th October 2002, from www.sciencedirect.com
• Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. Retrieved from www.google.com.tr
• Qi, A. (2012). On the Theoretical Framework of Autonomous Learning. I.J. Education and Management Engineering, 11, 35-40. Retrieved on 28th July 2013, from http://www.mecs-press.net
• Qian X. (2005). Helping EFL learners become autonomous readers: Self-access through metacognition. Teaching English in China, 1, 60-64.
• Reinders, H. (2000). Do it yourself? A learners' perspective on learner autonomy and self-access language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Groningen University.
• Reinders, H. (2007). Learner and teacher autonomy, concepts, realities and responses. Amssterdam, John Benjamins.
• Sinclair, B. (2000) Learner autonomy: The next phase? In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner autonomy, teacher utonomy: Future directions. Longman: London.
• Sinclair, B., I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) (2000). Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. Longman: London.
• Shiels, J. (1993). The workshop within the context of the Council of Europe’s modern languages program. In I. Huttunen Learning to learn languages: investigating learner strategies and learner autonomy. Report on Workshop 2B. Council for Cultural Cooperation. Council of Europe. Strasbourg.
• Stern, H. H. (1992). İssues and options in language Teaching. Oxford: OUP
• Tolin, J. (2007). Learner Autonomy, Self-Directed Learning and Assessment: Lessons from Swedish Experience. Independence 40 (Spring 2007).
• Thomson, C. K.(1996). Self-assessment in self-directed learning: issues of learner diversity. Taking control: Autonomy in language learning, R, Pemberton, et l.Hong Kong University Press.
• Torun, Y. U. (2010). The effects of strategy training on learners' vocabulary development . Unpublished Master’s, thesis, Gaziantep University, English Language Teaching Department.
• Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centered classroom. ELT Journal, 47(1), 23- 24.
• Tudor, I. (1996). Learner- centredness as language education. Cambridge University Press: UK.
• Voller, P., Martyn, E. & Pickard, V. (1999) ‘One-to-one counselling for autonomous learning in a self- access centre: final report on an action learning project’ In Crabbe, D. and Cotterall, S. (eds) 1999 Learner Autonomy in Language Learning: Defining the Field and Effecting Change p.111-126.Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Cambridge: Prentice-Hall.
• Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies in learner autonomy. UK: Prentice Hall.
• Westhoff, G. (1990). Learner strategies in information processing. In M. Biddle & P. Malmberg (eds) Learning to learn: investigating learner strategies and learner autonomy: report on workshop 2a. Language Learning for European Citizenship. Council for Cultural Cooperation. Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Sweden.
• Williams, M., & Burden, L. R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Yıldırım, Ö. (2005). ELT student's perceptions and behavior related to learner autonomy as learners and future teachers. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Anadolu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of English Language Teaching.
• Yumuk, A. (2002). Letting go of control to the learners: the role of the Internet in promoting a more autonomous view of learning in an academic translation course. Educational Research, 44(2), 141-156.
• Xu J. F. & Zhan X. H. (2004). Review of research on learner autonomy at home and abroad. Foreign Language World, 4, 2-9.
• Zhang, L.X. & Li X.X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4, 15- 23.
• Zimmerman, B. J. & Risenberg, R. (1997). Self- regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In Phye G. D. (ed.). Handbook of academic learning. Academic Press.