Türkiye’de Öğretmenlik Mesleğinin ChatGPT ile Dönüşümü: Fırsatlar ve Zorluklar

Öz

ChatGPT, yapay zekâ tabanlı bir metin üretme aracıdır. Eğitimde, öğretmenlerin metin yazma, içerik planlama ve dil becerilerini geliştirmek için kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, ChatGPT’nin eğitimdeki uygulamasına ilişkin öğretmenlerin algı ve deneyimlerini nitel olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada, 21 öğretmen ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Veriler, içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, ChatGPT’nin öğrencilere ve öğretmenlere 7/24 geri bildirim imkânı sağlayarak, kişiselleştirilmiş, işbirlikçi ve zengin içerikli bir öğrenme ortamı oluşturduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, ChatGPT’nin metin yazma ve dil becerilerinin geliştirilmesine de katkıda bulunduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, ChatGPT’nin etik, ticari, bağlamsal ve psikolojik açılardan bazı olumsuz taraflarının olduğu da ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu olumsuz taraflar mahremiyet, güvenlik, intihal, sanal bağımlılık, ayrımcılık ve önyargı gibi etik konuları kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışma, ChatGPT’nin eğitimdeki potansiyelini ve zorluklarını öğretmenlerin bakış açısıyla araştıran ilk çalışmalardan biri olup, bu alanda daha fazla araştırma yapılmasının gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ChatGPT
• Öğretmen
• Türkiye
• Fırsatlar
• Zorluklar

Transformation of the Teaching Profession in Turkey with ChatGPT: Opportunities and Challenges

Öz

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence-based text generation tool. It is used in education to improve teachers' text writing, content planning and language skills. This study aims to qualitatively evaluate teachers' perceptions and experiences regarding the application of ChatGPT in education. In the research, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 teachers. The data was analyzed using the content analysis method. Findings showed that ChatGPT creates a personalized, collaborative and content-rich learning environment by providing 24/7 feedback to students and teachers. Additionally, it has been determined that ChatGPT contributes to the development of text writing and language skills. However, it has also been revealed that ChatGPT has some negative aspects in terms of ethical, commercial, contextual and psychological aspects. These negative aspects include ethical issues such as privacy, security, plagiarism, cyber addiction, discrimination and prejudice. This study is one of the first to investigate the potential and challenges of ChatGPT in education from the perspective of teachers, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ChatGPT
• Teacher
• Türkiye
• Opportunity
• Difficulty

Kaynakça

1. Akman, V., & Blackburn, P. (2000). Alan Turing and artificial intelligence. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 391-395. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40180233
2. Alabool, H. M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: SWOT analysis approach. In 2023 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) (pp. 184-189). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT58056.2023.10225801
3. AlBadarin, Y., Tukiainen, M., Saqr, M., & Pope, N. (2023). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. SSRN, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4562771
4. Alhawiti, K. M. (2014). Natural language processing and its use in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(12).
5. Aljanabi, M. (2023). ChatGPT: Future directions and open possibilities. Mesopotamian Journal of Cybersecurity, 16-17. https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2023/003
6. Alqahtani, T., Badreldin, H. A., Alrashed, M., Alshaya, A. I., Alghamdi, S. S., bin Saleh, K., ... Albekairy, A. M. (2023). The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 19(8), 1236-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.016
7. Balyer, A., & Öz, Ö. (2018). Academicians' views on digital transformation in education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 809-830. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1250526
8. Day, T. (2023). A preliminary investigation of fake peer-reviewed citations and references generated by ChatGPT. The Professional Geographer, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373

9. De Castro, C. A. (2023). A discussion about the impact of ChatGPT in education: Benefits and concerns. Journal of business theory and practice, 11(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22158/jbtp.v11n2p28
10. Dede, A. T. (2017). Examining the relationships between modeling competencies, grade level and mathematics achievement. Primary Education Online, 16(3), 1201-1219.
11. Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
12. Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2022). The threat, hype, and promise of artifcial intelligence in education. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2(22), 1-13. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-022-00039-z
13. Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022). Exploring Teachers’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT. Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163
14. Irfan, M., Murray, L., & Ali, S. (2023). Integration of artificial intelligence in academia: A case study of critical teaching and learning in higher education. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(viii-i).32
15. Javier, D. R. C., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Developing secondary school English language learners' productive and critical use of ChatGPT. TESOL Journal, 15(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.755
16. Kirmani, A. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence-enabled science poetry. ACS Energy Letters, 8(1), 574-576. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02758
17. Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2022). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
18. Merriam, S. B. (2015). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (S. Turan, Çev. Ed.). Nobel.
19. Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN, 1-19.
20. Nash, B. L., Hicks, T., Garcia, M., Fassbender, W., Alvermann, D., Boutelier, S., & Young, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in English education: Challenges and opportunities for teachers and teacher educators. English Education, 55(3), 201-206.
21. Qasem, F. (2023). ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: Future fears and reassurances. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2023-0043
22. Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423
23. Sonderegger, S., & Seufert, S. (2022). Chatbot-mediated learning: conceptual framework for the design of chatbot use cases in education. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU), 1, 207-215. https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2022/109992/109992.pdf
24. Thippeswami, H. (2023). A SWOT and impact analysis of ChatGPT. Research Bulletin, 48(3-4), 14-21.
25. Valtonen, T., López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M., Vartiainen, H., Sointu, E. T., & Tedre, M. (2022). The nature and building blocks of educational technology research. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123
26. Vartiainen, H., & Tedre, M. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in craft education: crafting with text-to-image generative models. Digital Creativity, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557
27. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
28. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
29. Zhai, X. (2021) Practices and theories: How can machine learning assist in innovative assessment practices in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09901-8