The Mediating Effect of Teacher Agency in the Association between Empowering Leadership and Teacher Professional Learning

Abstract

The current study aimed to explore the mediating role of teacher agency in the relationship between empowering leadership and teacher professional learning. With this purpose, it is investigated how empowering leadership benefits teachers’ professional learning using data collected from 344 teachers working in Türkiye. The importance of this study is that it demonstrates how empowering leadership in schools can affect teachers' professional learning by promoting teacher agency, which refers to a sense of autonomy and control over their professional activities, thus providing valuable insights for school leadership practices. Findings showed that a) empowering leadership was significantly associated with teacher professional learning, b) empowering leadership significantly predicted teacher agency, c) teacher agency was significantly associated with teacher professional learning and (d) teacher agency had a mediation role in the association between empowering leadership and teacher professional learning. The findings provide a deeper understanding of the benefits and effective mechanism of the impact of empowering leadership on teachers' professional learning in the Turkish schools context and offer practical suggestions for facilitating teacher agency in organizations. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the school leadership literature on the empowering role of school principals in initiating, supporting, and enhancing teachers' professional learning by supporting teacher agency.

Keywords

• Empowering leadership
• Teacher agency
• Teacher professional learning

Güçlendirici Liderlik ve Öğretmen Mesleki Öğrenmesi Arasındaki İlişkide Öğretmen Failliğinin Aracılık Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, güçlendirici liderlik ile öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmeleri arasındaki ilişkide öğretmen failliğinin aracılık rolünü araştırmaktır. Bu amaçla, Türkiye'de görev yapan 344 öğretmenden toplanan veriler kullanılarak güçlendirici liderliğin öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmelerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın önemi, okullarda güçlendirici liderliğin öğretmenin mesleki faaliyetlerinde özerklik ve kontrol hissi anlamına gelen failliğini teşvik ederek öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmelerini nasıl etkileyebileceğini göstermesi ve böylece okul liderliği uygulamaları için değerli içgörüler sağlamasıdır. Bulgular, a) güçlendirici liderliğin öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesi ile anlamlı bir şekilde ilişkili olduğunu, b) güçlendirici liderliğin öğretmen failliğini anlamlı bir şekilde yordadığını, c) öğretmen failliğinin öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesi ile anlamlı bir şekilde ilişkili olduğunu ve (d) öğretmen failliğinin güçlendirici liderlik ve öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesi arasındaki ilişkide bir aracılık rolü olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bulgularımız, güçlendirici liderliğin Türk okulları bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmeleri üzerindeki etkisinin faydaları ve etkili mekanizması hakkında daha derin bir anlayış sağlamakta ve örgütlerde öğretmen failliğini kolaylaştırmak için pratik öneriler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarının, okul müdürlerinin öğretmen failliğini destekleyerek öğretmenlerin mesleki öğrenmelerini başlatma, destekleme ve geliştirmedeki güçlendirici rolüne ilişkin okul liderliği literatürüne katkıda bulunması beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güçlendirici liderlik
• Öğretmen failliği
• Öğretmen mesleki öğrenmesi

Kaynakça

1. Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.924470
2. Andrews, D., & Lewis, M. (2002). The experience of a professional community: Teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace. Educational Research, 44(3), 237–254. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00131880210135340
3. Balkar, B. (2015). Defining an empowering school culture (ESC): Teacher perceptions. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 205-224. https://doi/abs/10.3316/informit.535534357347657
4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free, New York.
5. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Çalışkan, Ö. ve Gümüş, S. (2019). Öğretmen Failliği Ölçeği’nin (ÖFÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 9(1), 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/632856
6. Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2023). The effect of learning-centred leadership and teacher trust on teacher professional learning: Evidence from a centralised education system. Professional Development in Education, 49(5), 925-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879234
7. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2022). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 812-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945706
8. Berry, B., Johnson, D., & Montgomery, D. (2005). The power of teacher leadership. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 56–60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ725886

9. Brodie, K. (2019). Teacher agency in professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 560-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689523
10. Brown, M., McKnight, L., Yager, K., & O'Sullivan, K. A. (2021). Empowering English teachers: Teacher agency in Australia. English in Australia, 56(1), 26-33. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/empowering-english-teachers-teacher-agency/docview/2617214796/se-2
11. Campbell, C. (2017). Developing teachers’ professional learning: Canadian evidence and experiences in a world of educational improvement. Canadian Journal of Education, 40(2), 1-33. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/developing-teachers-professional-learning/docview/1922374798/se-2
12. Canbolat, Y. (2020). Professional autonomy of high school teachers in Turkey: A retrospective and prospective policy analysis. Eğitim ve Bilim, 45(202), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.7833
13. Chen, L. (2024). Understanding teacher learning in professional learning communities in China: Experiences from a Shanghai junior secondary school. Routledge.
14. Cheong, M., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Spain, S. M., & Tsai, C. Y. (2019). A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 34-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2018.08.005.
15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.
16. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute, Palo Alto, CA. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
17. Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Falmer Press.
18. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
19. Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Duemer, L. S. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310474412.
20. Dinham, S. (2007). How schools get moving and keep improving: Leadership for teacher learning, student success and school renewal. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410705100304
21. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
22. Evers, A. T., Kreijns, K., & Heijden, B. I. Van Der. (2016). The design and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ professional development at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055465
23. Frostenson, M. (2015). Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalization of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28464
24. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Routledge.
25. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1167322
26. Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Markkanen, I., Pennanen, M., & Gijbels, D. (2014). Peer-group mentoring as a tool for teacher development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.983068
27. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109, 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900401
28. Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
29. Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/How-Principals-Affect-Students-and-Schools.pdf
30. Gümüş, S., Apaydın, Ç. ve Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2018). Öğretmen mesleki öğrenme ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 9(17), 107-124. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/513987
31. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980‐1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
32. Hallinger, P., & Liu, S. (2016). Leadership and teacher learning in urban and rural schools in China: Meeting the dual challenges of equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.001
33. Hallinger, P., Liu, S., & Piyaman, P. (2019). Does principal leadership make a difference in teacher professional learning? A comparative study China and Thailand. Compare, 49(3), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1407237
34. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
35. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. (2007). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement: CALDER Working Paper 3. The Urban Institute.
36. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality. Melbourne, Australia.
37. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
38. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
39. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across Nations. Sage.
40. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
41. Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158
42. Hoyle, E. & John, P. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. Cassell.
43. Karacabey, M. F., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Adams, D. (2022). Principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Turkish schools: Examining the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy and teacher trust. Educational studies, 48(2), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1749835
44. Kauppinen, M., Kainulainen, J., Hökkä, P., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2020). Professional agency and its features in supporting teachers’ learning during an in-service education programme. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 384-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1746264
45. King, F. (2019). Professional learning: Empowering teachers? Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1580849
46. King, F. (2022). Supporting teachers to lead by learning and learn by leading. Professional Development in Education, 48(3), 361-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2082699
47. Konan, N. ve Çelik, O. T. (2018). Güçlendirici Liderlik Ölçeği’nin eğitim örgütleri için Türkçe’ye uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(4), 1043-1054. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.434140
48. Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420
49. Kools, M. & Stoll L. (2016). What makes a school a learning organisation? OECD Education Working Papers (No. 137). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlwm62b3bvh-en
50. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4
51. Lee, S., Cheong, M., Kim, M., & Yun, S. (2017). Never too much? The curvilinear relationship between empowering leadership and task performance. Group & Organization Management, 42(1), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116646474
52. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Open University Press.
53. Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
54. Lennert da Silva, A. L., & Mølstad, C. E. (2020). Teacher autonomy and teacher agency: A comparative study in Brazilian and Norwegian lower secondary education. The Curriculum Journal, 31(1), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.3
55. Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. H. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108317020
56. Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In M. Kooy & K. Van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters (pp. 22-43). Routledge.
57. Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
58. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023
59. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1163415
60. Lovett, S. (2020). Understanding values embedded in the leadership of reciprocal professional learning by teachers. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787199
61. Makuachukwu, S. (2023). A study on the effects of professional development on teacher leadership skills. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Educational Study, 4(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamres.v4i2.405
62. Mausethagen, S., & Mølstad, C. E. (2015). Shifts in curriculum control: Contesting ideas of teacher autonomy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28520
63. Mohamadi, P., & Ghanbari, S. (2022). Investigating the role of visionary and empowering leadership of school principals on teacher's change tendencies by mediating role of teachers’ organizational learning and professional development. School Administration, 10(3), 85-109. https://www.doi.org/10.34785/j010.2022.033
64. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
65. Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage.
66. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
67. Özdemir, M., Kaymak, M. N., & Çetin, O. U. (2023). Unlocking teacher potential: The integrated influence of empowering leadership and authentic leadership on teacher self-efficacy and agency in Turkey. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231217136
68. Özdemir, M., Eriçok, B., Topaloğlu, H., & Tuti, G. (2024). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction in vocational high schools in Türkiye: A multilevel mediation model of teacher professional learning and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(3), 309-324. https://doi/10.1108/JEA-08-2023-0200/full/html
69. Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017). Teacher agency and professional learning communities: What can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316
70. Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s professional agency – a relational approach to teacher learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1181196
71. Polatcan, M. (2021). An exploration of the relationship between distributed leadership, teacher agency, and professional learning in Turkey. Professional Development in Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1905050
72. Polatcan, M., Özkan, P., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2024). Cultivating teacher innovativeness through transformational leadership and teacher agency in schools: The moderating role of teacher trust. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(3), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2024-0008
73. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F., (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
74. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015a). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
75. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015b). Teacher agency: What is it, and why does it matter? In R. Kneyber, & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the bottom up (pp. 134–148). Routledge.
76. Riveros, A., Newton, P., & Burgess, D. (2012). A situated account of teacher agency and learning: Critical reflections on professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(1), 202–216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.35.1.202
77. Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
78. Smaller, H. (2015). The teacher disempowerment debate: Historical reflections on slender autonomy. Paedagogica Historica, 51(1–2), 136– 151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2014.997752
79. Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256789
80. Squire-Kelly, V. D. (2012). The relationship between teacher empowerment and student achievement [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Southern University]. Electronic Theses & Dissertations. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/406
81. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
82. Talebizadeh, S., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Bellibaş, M. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100970. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2020.100970
83. Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678867
84. Timperley, H. (2011). Realising the power of professional learning. McGraw-Hill.
85. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001
86. Tynjälä, P., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2011). Beginning teachers’ transition from pre-service education to working life. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(1), 11-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11618-011-0175-6
87. Vecchio, R. P., Justin, J. E., & Pearce, C. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediating mechanisms within a hierarchical structure. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.014
88. Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
89. Zhang, S., Ke, X., Frank Wang, X. H., & Liu, J. (2018). Empowering leadership and employee creativity: A dual‐mechanism perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 896-917. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12219
90. Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: The role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2