GÖRSEL OKURYAZARLIK EĞİTİMİNİN ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ PROBLEM ÇÖZME YAKLAŞIMLARINA ETKİSİ: GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Bu çalışma görsel okuryazarlık eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme yaklaşımlarına etkisini betimlemek için yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya Okul Öncesi Eğitimi bölümündeki 89 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarına öğretim teknolojisi ve materyal tasarımı dersi kapsamında üç haftada toplam 180 dakika görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi verilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarına eğitim öncesi ve sonrası Problem Çözme Envanteri PÇE uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada nitel ve nicel yöntem birarada kullanılmıştır. Nitel veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile, nicel veriler ise PÇE ile toplanmıştır. Nitel veriler içerik analizi ile, nicel veriler ise t testi ile çözümlenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi, öğretmen adaylarının özgüvenlerini, görsel farkındalıklarını, görsel iletişim becerilerini artırmıştır. Problem çözme envanterine göre de görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi sonrasında öğretmen adaylarının “kaçıngan”ve “kendine güvenli” alt boyutlarda anlamlı düzeyde farklılık gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Görsel okuryazarlık,Problem çözme,Öğretim teknolojisi

The Effect of Visual Literacy Education on the Problem Solving Approaches of Teacher Trainees

Abstract

This study has been conducted in order to describe the effect of visual literacy education on the problem solving approaches of teacher trainees. 89 teacher trainees have participated in the study. Teacher trainees have received a total of 180 minutes visual literacy education in three weeks within the scope of the course of instructional technology and materials design. Problem Solving Inventory PSI has been implemented to teacher trainees in pre and post education periods. The qualitative data were collected through a semi-structured interview form and qualitative data were collected through PSI. Qualitative data were content-analyzed and quantitative data were analyzed with t-test. The results suggest that visual literacy education enhanced the self-confidence, visual awareness and visual communication skills of the students. According to problem solving inventory following the visual literacy education, there have been significant differences in the sub-dimensions of “reserved” and “self-confident”

Keywords

• visual literacy,problem solving,Instructional technology

Kaynakça

1. Adair, J. (2000). Karar Verme ve Problem Çözme. N. Kalaycı (Çev.) Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
2. Ausburn, L.J.,& Ausburn, F.B. (1978). Visual literacy: Background, theory and practice.
3. Programmed Learning & Educational Technology, 15(4), 291-297.
4. Avgerinou, M.D. (2009). Re-viewing visual literacy in the “bain d’ images” era. TechTrends, 53(2), 28-34
5. Baron, R. A. (1996). Essential Of Psychology, A Child Psychology And Adjustment, Boston: Allyn And Bacon.
6. Bingham, A. (1998). Çocuklarda Problem Çözme Yeteneklerinin Geliştirilmesi, F. Oğuzkan (Çev.) İstanbul: MEB Yayınları.
7. Bleed, R. (2005). Visual literacy in higher education. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative
8. RetrievedJanuary24, 2012 fromhttp:/net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli4001.pdf

9. Braden, R.A.(1996). Visual Literacy. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp.491-520).New York : Simon&Schuster.
10. Brill, J.M.(2007). Visual literacy defined-the results of a delphi study: Can IVLA (operationally) define visual literacy? Journal of Visual Literacy. 27(1), 47-6
11. Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial learner. Journal of Visual Literacy. 30 (1), 19-46
12. Dewey, J. (1991). How We Think. New York: Prometheus Books
13. Ernst, J.V. & Clark, A.C. (2009). Technology-Based Content through virtual and physical modeling: A national research study. Journal of Technology Education. 20 (2), 23-36
14. Felder, R.M.,&Soloman,B.A.(2001).Index of learning styles questionnaire.North Carolina State University. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-­‐ public/ILSpage.html
15. Felten, P.(2008). Visual literacy. Change 40(6), 60-63.
16. Furlong, V. J. & Edwards, A. D. (1993). Language in classroom interaction.In M. Hammersley (Eds.) Controversies in Classroom Research. Buckingham, Open University Press.
17. Gay, L.R.,Airasian, P. &Mills, G.E.(2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed). Ohio: Merril Prentice Hall
18. Hattwig, D., Bussert, K., Medaille, A. & Burgess, J. (2012). Visual literacy standards in higher education: New opportunities for libraries and student learning. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13, 61–89
19. Hattwig,D., Burgess, J., Bussert, K., & Medaille, A. (2011). Visual Literacy Competency Standards forHigher Education. Association of College&Research Libraries, http://www.acrl.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/visualliteracy.pdf
20. Hodes, C.L. (1998). Understanding visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy. 18(2), 131- 136
21. Howe, A. (1999). A visual literacy – Why not?. The Journal of Design and Technology Education. 4 (3), 215-222
22. Heinich, R. Molenda, M.  Russel, J.D. (1989) Instructional media and new Technologies of ınstruction.(Third Edition). Macmillan Publishing Company.
23. Heppner, P. & Peterson, C.H.(1982) “The Development and Implications of a Personal Problem Solving Inventory”,Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29: 66-75.
24. Heppner, P.(1978) A review of the problem solving literature and it’s relationship to the counseling process. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 25, 366-375.
25. IVLA -International Visual Literacy Association.(21.01.2012). What is “visual literacy?”. Web: http://www.ivla.org/org_what_vis_lit.htm
26. Kalaycı, N. (2001). Sosyal Bilgilerde Problem Çözme ve Uygulamalar . Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi
27. Lohr, L. (2008). Creating graphics for learnig and performance: Lessons in visual literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
28. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York : Cambridge University Press.
29. Mayer, R. E.  Sims V. K. (1994). For whom ıs a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (3) 389-401
30. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Metros, S.E.& Woolsey, K. (2006). Visual literacy: An institutional imperative.Educausa Review, 41(3), 80-81.
32. Miller, H.B. & Burton, J.K. (1994). Images and imagery theory. Visual Literacy, A Spectrum of Visual Learning, D.M. Moore. & F.M. Dwyer. (65-84) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
33. Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the new students. Educause Review. 37-47. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0324.pdf
34. Riesland, E.(2005). Visual literacy and the classroom. New Horizons for Learning, Retrieved January 24, 2012, from http://www.newhorizons.org
35. Sosa, T.(2009). Visual literacy: The missing piece of your technology integration course. TechTrends, 53(2),55-58
36. Pettersson, R. (2009). Visual literacy and message design. TechTrends, 53(2),38-40
37. Pettersson, R. (2006). Research in information design. Journal of Visual Literacy. 26(1), 77-88
38. Pettersson, R. (1993). Visual information. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
39. Phillips, L. (2005). Look and see: Using the visual environment as access to literacy. Research Brief .Pasific Resources for Education and Learning (PRE) .6pp Retrieved January 26,2012 from ERIC database
40. Romizowsky, A. J. (1968). Designing Instructional System, Kogan Page, London, New York: Nichols Publishing.
41. Savaşır I.& Şahin, H. N,(1997).Bilişsel-Davranışçı Terapilerde Değerlendirme: Sık Kullanılan Ölçekler,Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları 9, Ankara:Özyurt Matbaacılık
42. Seglem, R.&Witte, S. (2009). You gotta see it to believe it: Teaching visual literacy in the English classroom.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 53(3), 216-226.
43. Senemoğlu, N. (2004) Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim. Kuramdan Uygulamaya, Ankara. Gazi Kitabevi.
44. Seylan ,A. (2005).Temel Tasarım. Samsun: M-Kitap
45. Uçar, Z.T. ve Altun, A. (2006). Sorun çözme becerilerinin öğretimi. A. Şimşek. (Ed.), İçerik Türlerine Dayalı Öğretim (pp. 101-131) Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım
46. Ülgen, G. (2001). Kavram Geliştirme. Ankara: PegemA yayıncılık.
47. Yeh, H.T. & Lohr, L.(2010). Towards evidence of visual literacy: Assessing pre-service teachers’ perceptions of instructional visuals, Journal of Visual Literacy. 29(2), 183-197
48. Yeh, H.T. & Cheng, Y.C. (2010). The influence of the instruction of visual design principle on improving pre-service teachers’ visual literacy. Computers & Education. 54(1),244-252.
49. Yenawind, P.(1997). Thoughts on visual literacy. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts (pp. 845-847) New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.