ÖĞE GÖSTERİM TEORİSİ’NİN BİR UYGULAMASI: FONKSİYON KAVRAMININ ÖĞRETİMİ

Yıl 2004, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 287 - 297, 01.05.2004

Yüksel Dede

Öz

Öğe Gösterim Teorisi ÖGT , çeşitli öğretim bileşenlerini içeren bir öğretim teorisidir. ÖGT’nin bu özelliği, herhangi bir kavramın veya özelde bir matematiksel kavramın öğretiminde farklı öğretim stratejilerinin ve tekniklerinin birlikte kullanılmasına imkan verir. Bu durumda, öğrencilerin matematiksel kavramları daha kolay öğrenmelerine, öğretmenlerin de her düzeydeki öğrenciye daha fazla rehberlik yapabilmelerine olanak sağlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğe Gösterim Teorisi, Fonksiyon Kavramı, ÖGT ile Fonksiyon Kavramının Öğretimi

AN APPLICATION OF THE COMPONENT DISPLAY THEORY: THE FUNCTION CONCEPT TEACHING

Öz

The Component Display Theory CDT is a teaching method which contains various teaching components. This property of CDT enable us to use different teaching strategies and technics in teaching of any concept or, particularly, of mathematical concepts. This case gives the student a facility to learning math concepts more easily and it also help teachers to make more guidance to the students at every levels

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Component Display Theory, Function Concept teaching Teaching the concept of functions by means of the CDT.

Kaynakça

• Beckmann, C., Thompson, D. ve Senk, S. (1999). Assessing Students' Understanding of Functions in a Graphing Calculator Environment. School Science and Mathematics. December, 99, 8; ERIC, s. 451
• Chao, C. ve başk. (1983). Effects of Four Instructional Sequences on Application and Transfer, IDD&E Working Paper, no.12, ED289461. Eric Document Repricodument.
• Cooney, T. (1999). Developing a Topic across the Curriculum: Functions. (Ed., Peake, L.) Mathematics, Pedagogy and Secondary Teacher Education. 361 Hannover Street, USA.
• Dede,Y. (2003). Öğe Gösterim Teorisi’nin İlköğretim Matematik Öğretimindeki Etkililiği. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 1(3), s. 355-360.
• Fidan, N. (1996). Eğitim Psikolojisi, Okulda Öğrenme ve Öğretme. Alkım Yay. İstanbul.
• Hauge, S. (1993). Functions and Relations: Some Applications from Database Management for the Teaching of Classroom Mathematics. ED 365 519.
• Gaea, L., Orıt, Z. Ve Kay. S. (1990). Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching. Review of Educational Research. Spring, vol 60, no 1,s.1-64.
• Iaderosa, R. A. ve Malara, N. (1999). An Aspect of a Didactical Path for Approaching the Concept of Function: The Qualitative Interpretation of a Graph. http://math.unipa.it/ ~grim/AMalara, (2003, August 22 ).
• Keller, B. ve Reigeluth, C. (1982). Comparison of Three Instructional Presentation Formats. IDD&E Working Paper, No. 6, ED28851. Eric Document Repricodument.
• Marovitz, M. ve Buckley, J. (1987). Integrating ARCS Motivational Theory into the Component Display Theory of Instructional Design. ED292872. Eric Document Repricodument.
• MEB. (1992). Ortaöğretim Matematik Dersi Programları. Milli Eğitim Basımevi, İstanbul.
• Merrill, D. (1983). Component Display Theory. (Ed. Reigeluth C.). Instructional Design Theories and Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
• .................. (1987a). A Lesson Based On The Component Display Theory. Instructional Theories In Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models. (Ed. Reigeluth, C.). Hillsdale, New Jersey.
• ................... (1987b). The New Component Design Theory: Instructional Design for Courseware Authoring. Instructional Science 16, 19 -34.
• .................. (1988). Applying Component Display Theory to the Design of Courseware (Ed. Jonassen, D). Instructional Designs For Microcomputer Courseware. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 61-95.
• ................. (1994). The Descriptive Component Display Theory. Instructional Design Theory. (Ed. Twitchelll, D.). Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632.
• ................ (2001). Components of Instruction toward a Theoretical Tool for Instructional Design. Instructional Science 29: 291–310.
• Twitchell, D. (1990a). Robert M. Gagne and M. David Merrill: In Conversation. No. 5: A Comparison of Robert M. Gagne's Events of Instruction and M. David Merrill's Component Display Theory. Educational Technology. 30 (11), 35-39.
• ...............(1990b). A Simplified Approach to the Application of Component Display Theory. Educational Technology. April, 30 (4), 11-18.