Yaralı Şifacı Olmak Üzerine: Nitel Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 858 - 874, 30.09.2025

Necla Kayasandık , Canan Çitil Akyol

https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1577599

Öz

Bu bildirinin amacı, Carl Gustav Jung’un yaralı şifacı artekitipi hakkında ruh sağlığı uzmanlarının görüşlerini derinlemesine incelemektir. Bunun için çalışmada fenemenolojik desen kullanılmıştır. 13 ruh sağlığı uzmanı ile çevrimiçi platformda nitel görüşmeler düzenlenerek veriler toplanmıştır. Yaralı şifacı arketipi üzerine görüşler üç ana temaya göre kategorize edilmiştir: 1) kavramın romantize edilmesi, 2) empatiyi kolaylaştırması, 3) yarayı dönüştürmek. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, ruh sağlığı uzmanlarının yaralı şifacı arketipini kişisel ve mesleki yaşamlarında derinlemesine deneyimlediklerini ve bu arketipin, danışmanlık süreçlerindeki empatiyi güçlendiren bir unsur olarak algılandığını ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, bu arketipin kimi zaman idealize edilmesi ve aşırı romantize edilmesi nedeniyle, sınırların netleştirilmesi ve sağlıklı bir profesyonel tutum geliştirilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmıştır. Ruh sağlığı uzmanlarının kendilerini daha yakından tanımalarını destekleyen kişisel gelişim çalışmalarının teşvik edilmesi, yaralı şifacı arketipinin potansiyel risklerine karşı farkındalık geliştirilmesi ve süpervizyon süreçlerinde bu konunun ele alınması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yaralı Şifacı , Ruh Sağlığı Uzmanları , Analitik Psikoloji

On Wounded Healer: A Qualitative Study

Öz

This paper aims to examine the perspectives of mental health professionals on Carl Gustav Jung's wounded healer archetype using an in-depth phenomenological design. For this purpose, qualitative data were collected via online interviews with 13 practicing mental health professionals. The participants’ views on the wounded healer archetype were categorized into three main themes: 1) the romanticization of the concept, 2) the facilitation of empathy, 3) the transformation of personal wounds. The findings indicate that mental health professionals resonate deeply with the wounded healer archetype both personally and professionally. The archetype is widely perceived as an element that strengthens empathy in counseling processes. However, the results also highlight potential risks, particularly the tendency to idealize or overly romanticize the wounded healer, which can blur professional boundaries. The study underscores the importance of promoting self-awareness and encouraging personal development activities among mental health professionals. It further recommends incorporating discussions of the wounded healer archetype into supervision processes, with a focus on establishing healthy professional boundaries and recognizing its potential psychological impact.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wounded Healer , Mental Health Professionals , Analytical Psychology.

Kaynakça

• Akçay, S., ve Beydili-Gürbüz, E. (2019). Toplumsal cinsiyet perspektifinden erkek sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının sosyal hizmet mesleğine yönelik deneyimleri. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 9(2), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.13114/MJH.2019.473
• Bager-Charleson, S. (2012). Personal development in counselling and psychotherapy. Sage Publishing.
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Barnett, J. E., & Molzon, C. H. (2014). Clinical supervision of psychotherapy: Essential ethics issues for supervisors and supervisees. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1051-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22126
• Barnett M. (2007). What brings you here? An exploration of the unconscious motivations of those who choose to train and work as psychotherapists and counsellors, Psychodynamic Practice, 13(3), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753630701455796
• Batson, C. D. (2009). Empathy and altruism. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 417–426). Oxford University Press.
• Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press.
• Bike, M.M., Norcross J.C. & Schatz D.M. (2009). Processes and outcomes of psychotherapists’ personal therapy: replication and extension 20 years late. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(1), 19–31. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0015139
• Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York: Jason Aronson
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
• Brown, J. (2020). The ethics of wounded healer archetypes in therapy: Balancing empathy and professionalism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(3), 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22789
• Coltart, N. (1996). Ingredient X. Winnicott Centenary Lecture, 16 March 1966
• Creswell, J.W. (2014) A concise introduction to mixed methods research. California: Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
• Demir, M. (2016). Şamanizm’de hastalık kavramı ve tedavi yaklaşımları. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, 6(1), 19-24.
• Dickeson E. & Smout F. M. (2018) Is the Wounded Healer or the Psychologically Inflexible Healer in Undergraduate Psychology and Social Work Programs More Empathic or Willing to Violate Professional Boundaries?. Australian Journal of Clinical Education, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6338
• Dunne, C. (2022). Ruhun Yaralı Şifacısı (1. Baskı). Doğan Yayınları Yayıncılık ve Yapımcılık Tic. A.Ş.
• Elliott, R., Watson, J., Timulak, L., & Sharbanee, J. (2021). Research on humanistic-experiential psychotherapies: Updated review. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 421-467.
• Erdem, M. (2024). Yetişkinlerle çalışan terapistlerin karşı aktarım deneyimleri. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (27), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1393964
• Figley, C. R. (2013). Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized. Routledge.
• Geller, S. M., Norcross, J. C., & Orlinsky, D. E. (2016). The psychotherapist's own psychotherapy: Patient and clinician perspectives. Oxford University Press.
• Gülüm, İ. V. (2016). Etkili terapist özellikleri için farkındalık eğitim ve uygulamaları: Bir meta-sentez çalışması. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 8(4), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.253439
• Herman, N. (2001). My Kleinian home: Into a new millennium. London: Karnac Books.
• Jackson, W. S. (2001). Presidential address: The wounded healer. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75(1), 1-36
• Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. Pantheon Books.
• Jung, C.G. (2015). Psikoterapi pratiği. (S.Türk, 1. baskı). Kaknüs Yayınları. (Orijinal kitap 1953’te yayınlanmıştır.)
• Korkmaz, V. (2022). Tıbbi terminolojide Yunan mitolojisinin ayak izleri. Eskisehir Medical Journal, 3(2), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.48176/esmj.2022.81
• Malikiosi-Loizos. M. (2013, Mart). Personal therapy for future therapists: reflections on a still debated issue. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 2(1), 33–50. http://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v2i1.4
• Maxwell, J.A. (2012) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research Guide to Design and Implementation (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Mösler, T., Poppek, S., Leonhard, C., & Collet, W. (2023). Reflective skills, empathy, wellbeing, and resilience in cognitive-behaviour therapy trainees participating in midfulness-based self-practice/self-reflection. Psychological Reports, 126(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/003329412210944
• Moyers, T. B., & Miller, W. R. (2013). Is low therapist empathy toxic? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030274
• Norcross, J. C., & Lambert, M. J. (2018). Psychotherapy relationships that work III. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 303. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000193
• Orlinsky, D. E., Schofield, M. J., Schroder, T., & Kazantzis, N. (2011). Utilization of personel therapy by psychotherapists: a practice-friendly review and a new study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(8), 828-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20821
• Patton, Q. M. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluations Methods, (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
• Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Råbu, M., McLeod, J., Haavind, H., Bernhardt, I. S., Nissen-Lie, H., & Moltu, C. (2021). How psychotherapists make use of their experiences from being a client: Lessons from a collective autoethnography. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1671319
• Skovholt, T. M., & Trotter-Mathison, M. (2016). The resilient practitioner: Burnout and compassion fatigue prevention and self-care strategies for the helping professions. Routledge.
• Smith, P. (2018). The wounded healer: Re-examining the archetype in modern therapy. Counseling Today, 25(2), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717752866
• Teding van Berkhout, E., & Malouff, J. M. (2016). The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093
• Tekaüt A., Öksüz E., Güvenç G. & İyigün E. (2024) Kavram Analizi: Yaralı Şifacı. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışma Dergisi, 7(2), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1300752
• Telepak, L. C. (2010). Therapists as wounded healers: The impact of personal psychological struggles on work with clients [Honors thesis, Miami University].
• Wigg, R., Cushway, D., & Neal, A. (2011). Personal therapy for therapists and trainees: a theory of reflective practice from a review of the literature. Reflective Practice, 12(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.571866
• Zerubavel, N., & Wright, M. O. (2012). The dilemma of the wounded healer. Psychotherapy, 49(4), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027824