Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2022, , 621 - 632, 31.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2022-0020

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1996). Bases of power in relation to leader behavior: A field investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7(1): 3-21.
  • Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin kullandıkları güç kaynakları ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu arasındaki ilişki. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(2), 385-402.
  • Aslanargun, E. (2011). The Power Sources that Principals Handle in School Administration. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 3-28.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
  • Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Management: The new competitive landscape. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Bayrak, C., Altinkurt, Y., & Yilmaz, K. (2014). The relationship between school principals’ power sources and school climate. The Anthropologist, 17(1), 81-91.

Leadership Styles and Power Bases Preferences of Primary School Administrators from the Perspective of Preservice Science Teachers

Yıl 2022, , 621 - 632, 31.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2022-0020

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the types of leadership that primary school administrators exhibit and the power bases they utilize from the perspective of preservice science teachers.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Qualitative research design was applied in the study. The data were collected through the observations through 72 preservice science teachers during the Fall and Spring semesters and the assessment of the self-reports they prepared based on the semi-structured interviews with 18 school administrators.
Findings: According to the obtained data from the preservice science teachers, leadership style preferences of school principals are more in favor of instructional and moral leadership styles. The result is similar for school vice principals, but shared leadership style is also added to the mentioned leadership styles. The findings also show that the school administrators use legitimate and expert power bases more than the other power bases in educational administration process.
Highlights: The preservice science teachers additionally emphasized the school principals are greatly benefit from their charisma power on the contrary the school vice principals. On the other hand, they pointed out the school vice principals exhibit shared leadership more than the school principals. Last, the preservice teachers argued leadership preferences of the school administrators that aspect of science education related practices.

Kaynakça

  • Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1996). Bases of power in relation to leader behavior: A field investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7(1): 3-21.
  • Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin kullandıkları güç kaynakları ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu arasındaki ilişki. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(2), 385-402.
  • Aslanargun, E. (2011). The Power Sources that Principals Handle in School Administration. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 2(3), 3-28.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
  • Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Management: The new competitive landscape. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Bayrak, C., Altinkurt, Y., & Yilmaz, K. (2014). The relationship between school principals’ power sources and school climate. The Anthropologist, 17(1), 81-91.
Toplam 6 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Selçuk Şahingöz 0000-0003-4884-7588

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2022
Kabul Tarihi 24 Haziran 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Şahingöz, S. (2022). Leadership Styles and Power Bases Preferences of Primary School Administrators from the Perspective of Preservice Science Teachers. Kastamonu Education Journal, 30(3), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2022-0020

10037