The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course

Sema Kara

doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1525362

EN

The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course

Öz

Purpose: In this study, the effects of effective combination of online technologies and face-to-face teaching practices on students' attitudes and course outcomes in secondary school visual arts courses were investigated. Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is an experimental study based on the Pre-Test - Post-Test Trial and Control Group (Split-Plot-t Design) 2x2 factorial (two groups and two measurements) and repeated measures design. In the study, "experimental procedures" were applied to the experimental group with sessions lasting two hours a week for 6 weeks. Findings: This research is an experimental study based on the Pre-Test - Post-Test Trial and Control Group (Split-Plot-t Design) 2x2 factorial (two groups and two measurements) and repeated measures design. In the study, "experimental procedures" were applied to the experimental group with sessions lasting two hours a week for 6 weeks. The research groups were divided into two separate groups. The experimental group was applied on Tuesday and the control group was applied on Wednesday. Highlights: The mean scores of the subjects who participated in the 6-week online learning and face-to-face teaching sessions in the post-test of visual arts acquisitions were higher than the mean scores of the pre-test. The Wilcoxon Z test was used to determine whether the difference between the mean scores of the experimental group in the pre-test and post-test of visual arts acquisitions was significant or not, and it was found that the difference was significant at p<.01 level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Visual Arts Education, Online Learning, Face-to-Face Teaching, Course Outcomes, Attitude towards Visual Arts Course

Kaynakça

Adu, K., & Duku, N. (2021). Learning styles and instructional materials as correlates of Grade 6 learners`’ Mathematics performance in Buffalo City, South Africa. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(3), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2021.41
Akinbadewa, B. O., & Sofowora, O. A. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia instructional learning packages in enhancing secondary school students' attitudes towards biology. International Journal on Studies in Education, 2(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.19
Alan, S., & Sünbül, A.M. (2010). High school students' relationship between computer and internet use and reading habits in Konya. The 4th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, September 24-26, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Alkauskas, G. (2018). Music-mathematics interconnections: An approach through science (works by mathematicians), and an approach through the arts. Lietuvos Muzikologija, 19, 175-191.
Altowairiki, N. (2021). Online collaborative learning: Analysing the process through living the experience. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.95
Alzboun, M.S., Halalsheh, N.Z., Alslaiti, F.M., Aldreabi H., & Dahdoul, N.K.S. (2023). The effect of digital content designed based on learning styles on academic achievement and motivation toward learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(6), 1405-1423. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3750
Anderson, L.W., & Bourke S.F. (2013). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. Routledge.
Aşkar, P., & Olkun, S. (2005). PISA 2003 sonuçları açısından okullarda bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kullanım. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19, 15-34.
Aslantaş, S. (2014). Görsel sanatlar dersine yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2, 185-196.
Baş, G., Kubiatko, M., & Sünbül, A.M. (2016). Teachers' perceptions towards ICTs in teaching-learning process: Scale validity and reliability study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 61, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/t53684-000

Bates, A. W. (1997). Restructuring the university for technological change. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Cole, M.T., Shelley, D.J., & Swartz, L.B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three-year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748
Comer, D.K., Clark, C.R., & Canelas, D.A. (2014). Writing to learn and learning to write across the disciplines: Peer-to-peer writing in introductory-level MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 26-82. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/156214/
Cung, B., Xu D., & Eichhorn, S. (2018). Increasing interpersonal interactions in an online course: Does increased instructor email activity and voluntary meeting time in a physical classroom facilitate student learning?. Online Learning, 22(3), 193-215. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i3.1322
Demosthenous, G., Panaoura, A., & Eteokleous, N. (2020). The use of collaborative assignment in online learning environments: The case of higher education. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(2), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i2.43
Doğru, O. (2020). An investigation of pre-service visual arts teachers' perceptions of computer self-efficacy and attitudes towards web-based instruction. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 629-637. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1454
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Thompson, J., Kramer, L., DeCantis, G., & Hermsdorfer, A. (2015). Student satisfaction with online learning: Is it a psychological contract?. Online Learning, 19(2), 1-15.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2013). Emerging technologies: The technological imperative in teaching and learning less commonly taught languages. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10125/24502
Hiltz, S.R. (1995). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Focus on students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 1(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v1i2.1934
Hu, H., & Huang, F. (2021). Application of universal design for learning into remote English education in Australia amid COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.59
Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Atmotiyoso, P., Siregar, M., Ahmad, R., Jasmi, K., Hisyam, N. (2018). Big data emerging technology: insights into an innovative environment for online learning resources. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.6990
Huppert, F.A. (2009). Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x
Johnson, S.D., & Aragon, S.R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.117
Jonassen, D.H. (2004). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Taylor and Francis.
Kaleli, Y.S. (2020). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on piano education: An experimental study with pre-service music teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i3.115
Kaleli, Y.S. (2021). The effect of individualised online instruction on TPACK skills and achievement in piano lessons. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.143
Kara, S. (2021). An investigation of visual arts teachers' attitudes towards distance education in the time of COVID-19. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 3(3), 576-588. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.246
Khan, B.H. (1998). Web-Based Instruction (WBI): An introduction. Educational Media International, 35(2), 63-71. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/85633/
Kibici, V.B. (2018). İlkokul müfredatına uygun müzik dersi eğitim yazılım programının geliştirilmesi ve uygulanmasının değerlendirilmesi (Tez No. 592232) [Doktora tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi-Konya]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Kibici, V.B., & Sarıkaya, M. (2021). Readiness levels of music teachers for online learning during the COVID 19 Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.192
Kim, C., Park, S.W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x
Kizilcec, R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J.J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behaviour and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
Koyuncuoğlu, O. (2021). Lisansüstü öğrencilerinin teknolojik pedagojik ve alan bilgilerinin (TPAB) incelenmesi. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 9(2), 299-313.
Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A.E., Belland, B.R., & Schroder, K.E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programmes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 16-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A.E., Schroder, K.E., & Belland, B.R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
Lee, J. (2014). An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1638
Lim, C.P., & Ching, C.S. (2004). An activity-theoritical approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools: Orienting activities and learner autonomy. Computers & Education, 43, 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.005
Lu, W., Wang, H., Lin, Y., & Li, L. (2020). Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Research, 288, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112936
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C.D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Martinez, M. (2002). What is personalised learning?. The eLearning Developers' Journal, 1-8. https://www.learningguild.com/pdf/2/050702dss-h.pdf
McLeod, S. (2017). Experimental design. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/experimental-designs.html.
Montgomerie, K., Edwards, M., & Thorn, K. (2016). Factors influencing online learning in an organisational context. Journal of Management Development, 35(10), 1313-1322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-05-2016-0067
Moore-Adams, B.L., Jones, W.M., & Cohen, J. (2016). Learning to teach online: A systematic review of the literature on K-12 teacher preparation for teaching online. Distance Education, 37(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1232158
Naser, A.Y., Dahmash, E.Z., Al-Rousan, R., Alwafi, H., Alrawashdeh, H.M., & Ghoul, I. (2020). Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: A cross- sectional study. Brain and Behaviour, 10(8), e01730. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1730
Newby, J.M., O'Moore, K., Tang, S., Christensen, H., & Faasse, K. (2020). Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. PLoS One, 15(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236562
Payton, M. E., Richter, S. J., Giles, K. L., & Royer, T. A. (2006). Transformations of count data for tests of interaction in factorial and split-plot experiments. Journal Of Economic Entomology, 99(3), 1002-1006. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-99.3.1002
Phirangee, K. (2016). Students' perceptions of learner-learner interactions that weaken a sense of community in an online learning environment. Online Learning, 20(4), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.1053
Pushpanadham, K., Mandal, S., & Sareen, S. (2023). Revisiting ’great media debate’: Technology-mediated learning and ground realities across the Indian Institutes of Technology. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2023.2
Qihan. (2020). Internet+ supported art teachers' quality improvement training programmes of Xinzheng city. https://www.meipian.cn/2qtky2jq
Ruane, R., & Koku, E.F. (2014). Social network analysis of undergraduate education student interaction in online peer mentoring settings. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 577-589.
Shackelford, J.L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 228-249. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
Şisman, B., & Kucuk, S. (2019). An educational robotics course: Examination of educational potentials and pre-service teachers' experiences. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 510-531.
Sünbül, A.M. (2010). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri. Çizgi Yayınevi.
Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and Pedagogical Models: Analysis of Factors and Measurement of Learning Outcomes in Education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311
Tawfik, A.A., Giabbanelli, P.J., Hogan, M., Msilu, F., Gill, A., & York, C.S. (2018). Effects of success v failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Computers & Education, 118, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.013
Thompson, V.L., & McDowell, Y.L. (2019). A case study comparing student experiences and success in an undergraduate course offered through online, blended, and face-to- face instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116-136. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.552411
Tor, H., & Erden, O. (2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgi teknolojilerinden yararlanma düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 120-130.
Vijayavalsalan, B. (2018). Students’ impressions on the effectiveness of online discussion forums. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(1), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.03.01.6
Vilppu, H., Södervik, I., Postareff, L., & Murtonen, M. (2019). The effect of short online pedagogical training on university teachers' interpretations of teaching-learning situations. Instructional Science, 47, 679-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09496-z
Wang, M., Wang, M., Cui, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Art teachers' attitudes towards online learning: An empirical study using self determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 627095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627095
Wikipedia. (2021, 25 October). Albrecht Dürer. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albrecht_D%C3%BCrer.
Xhelili, P., Ibrahimi, E., Rruci, E., & Sheme, K. (2021). Adaptation and perception of online learning during COVID-19 Pandemic by Albanian university students. International Journal on Studies in Education, 3(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.49
Yıldız, R., Sünbül, A.M., Koç, M., & Halis, İ. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme kitabı. Nobel-Atlas Yayınevi.
Yurt, E., & Sünbül, A.M. (2012). Effect of modelling-based activities developed using virtual environments and concrete objects on spatial thinking and mental rotation skills. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 1987-1992.
Zillmer, D., & Mussmann, T. (2023). Improving student performance with ILS based student-teacher pairings. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 5(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.133
Zimmerman, T.D. (2012). Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1302
Zuhairi, M., Nomida, M.D., & Hartati, M. (2018). Development of online learning model in learning plan programme on education teacher of madrasah ibtidayah study programme (PGMI). International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 9, 26041-26046.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Sema Kara ^*
0000-0002-6482-7598
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Temmuz 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

31 Ekim 2023

Kabul Tarihi

16 Mart 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1525362

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA34ZY32HB

APA

Kara, S. (2024). The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(3), 464-473. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1525362

AMA

1.Kara S. The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2024;32(3):464-473. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1525362

Chicago

Kara, Sema. 2024. “The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course”. Kastamonu Education Journal 32 (3): 464-73. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1525362.

EndNote

Kara S (01 Temmuz 2024) The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course. Kastamonu Education Journal 32 3 464–473.

IEEE

[1]S. Kara, “The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 32, sy 3, ss. 464–473, Tem. 2024, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.1525362.

ISNAD

Kara, Sema. “The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course”. Kastamonu Education Journal 32/3 (01 Temmuz 2024): 464-473. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1525362.

JAMA

1.Kara S. The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2024;32:464–473.

MLA

Kara, Sema. “The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 32, sy 3, Temmuz 2024, ss. 464-73, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1525362.

Vancouver

1.Sema Kara. The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Temmuz 2024;32(3):464-73. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1525362

Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY) ile lisanslanmıştır.

Öz

The Effect of Online and Face-To-Face Teaching Method on Course Outcomes and Attitudes in Secondary School 1st Grade Visual Arts Course

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster