The Evolution of Theories, Transformations, and Emerging Trends in Distance Education Worldwide: A Comprehensive Research Article

Yıl 2024, , 600 - 611, 28.10.2024

Şenol Deniz , Adulbaki Emir Alıcı

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574351

Öz

Purpose: The fundamental objective of the current comprehensible research article is to dwell on the developmental and historical process, theoretical approaches and foundations, along with technological improvements of newly emerging trends in distance education. Furthermore, the study puts a great deal of emphasis on the most significant psychological theories such as behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism and in what ways they can contribute to the effectiveness of distance education platforms. The study also explores the theoretical foundations such as systems theory, communication theory and media theory along with a focus on connectivism to comprehend distance education with a careful assessment on the integration of the emerging technological advancements such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and augmented reality by revealing their transformative impacts and the potential on distance education. Henceforth, to accomplish such an aim, the current article provides a comprehensive analysis of distance education and offers a collection of insights into distance education for teachers, policymakers and other researchers in the relevant field.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The current article employs a literature review as a research method to assess and evaluate the essential existing research body and to obtain definitive, evidence-based, practical, compelling and persuasive data within the relevant field of distance education from a constructivist perspective to find a clear answer to the research questions.
Findings: The current study accentuates and finds that the improvements in technology, particularly, the Internet and fiber optics, have a transformative impact on distance education by improving interactivity and accessibility. Distance education seems to have evolved from corresponding with letters to sophisticated online platforms, enhancing global accessibility and overcoming challenges and obstacles. Psychological theories such as behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism are of high importance in optimizing learning experiences in this technological era.
Highlights: The study highlights that the emerging trends in technology, comprising virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and artificial intelligence (AI), have a profound transformative effect on distance education by improving interactivity, visualization, and individualized learning experiences. VR and AR offer immersive, 3D settings that enhance involvement, engagement and understanding, whereas AI grands individualized learning and assessments, reshaping traditional educational methods and enhancing access to effective and productive learning opportunities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Distance Education, Emerging Trends in Distance Learning, The Evolution of Distance Education, Changes in Distance Education, Psychological Theories for Distance Education

Kaynakça

• Adıyaman, Z. (2002). Foreign language teaching through distance education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology–TOJET, 1(1), 92-97.
• Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
• Antalyalı, Ö.L. (2004). Perception of distance education and feasibility of teaching operations through distance education (Unpublished master’s thesis). Social Sciences Institute, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta.
• Arar, A. (1999). Historical development of distance education, distance education implementation models, and costs. In Proceedings of the First Distance Education Symposium (pp.15-16). Kara Kuvvetleri Eğitim ve Doktrin Komutanlığı, Ankara.
• Armstrong-Mensah, E. Ramsey-White, K., Yankey, B., & Self-Brown, S. (2020) Covıd-19 and distance learning: effects on Georgia state university school of public health students. Public Health, 8, 547.
• Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2011) Going the distance: Online education in the United States. the Online learning consortium. USA: Babson College.
• Bayam, M., Aksoy, M.S. (2002). Distance education in Turkey and The Sakarya University implementation. Journal of Science Institute of Sakarya University, 6(1), 169-175.
• Bruder, I. (1989) Distance learning: what’s holding back this boundless delivery system? Electronic Learning, 8(6), 30–35.
• Çoban, S. (2013). Development of distance education and technology-supported education. In Proceedings of the XVI. Internet Conference in Turkey. Istanbul.
• Çukadar, S., Çelik, S. (2003). Internet-based distance education and university libraries. Doğuş̧ University Journal, 4(1), 31-42.
• Deniz, Ş. (2024). A BRIEF HISTORY OF BLENDED LEARNING AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 15(55), p. 419-434. Doi: 10.35826/ijoess.4423.
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ – Merrill.
• Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
• Holmberg, B. (1985). The Feasibility of a Theory of Teaching for Distance Education and a Proposed Theory. ZIFF Papiere 60.
• Huang, Y., & Liang, Y. (2023). Exploring the use of virtual and augmented reality in distance education: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 1-14.
• Mayadas, F. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks: a sloan foundation perspective. J. Asynchronous Learn, 1(1), 1–16.
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two – Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
• Moore, M. G. & Anderson, W. G. (2003). Handbook of distance education. Mahwah, N.J – L. Erlbaum Associates.
• Morrou, H.I. (1982). A history of education in antiquity; University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, USA.
• Nizam, F. (2004). Possibilities and advantages of using mass communication tools in education. In Proceeding of KTÜ Academic Informatics (pp.1-17).
• Nasrullah, Y. (2014) Role of multimedia tutorials in distance education. International Journal for Informatics, 7, 933–941.
• Littlejohn, S. W. (1989). Theories of human communication (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA – Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Tschida, C. M., Linder, K. E., & Swanson, R. A. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in personalized learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 45-58.
• Tzima, S., Styliaras, G., & Bassounas, A. (2019). Augmented reality applications in education: Teacher’s point of view. Educational Sciences, 9(4), 99.
• Papi, C., Büyükaslan, A. (2007). Developments in distance education in Turkey and France: Which educational rights? In Proceedings of Colloque TiceMediterranean – Human/Change Issues in Distance Education.
• Richey, R., Tracey, M. W., & Klein, J. D. (2011). The instructional design knowledge based – theory, research, and practice. New York – Routledge.
• Ryan, T. A. (1975). Analysis of the systems approach. In S. D. Zalatimo & P.J. Sleeman (Eds.), A systems approach to learning environments (pp. 118-129). Pleasantville, NY – Docent Corporation. Olivier, M. (2014) Monetizing French Distance Education. A Field Enquiry on Higher
• Education Value(s). In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning; Athabasca University Press: Athabasca, AB, Canada, 15.
• Özbay, Ö. (2015). Current state of distance education in the world and Turkey. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(5), 376-394.
• Samur, Y., Akgün, E., & Duman, B. (2011). Distance Education in Turkey: Past-Present-Future. In Proceedings of the International Higher Education Congress. New Directions and Issues (pp. 1325-1330).
• Schunk, D.H. (1991). Learning theories – An educational perspective. New York – Macmillan.
• Shahabadi, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous learning e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learner. Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 176, 125–138.
• Sun, R., Y.J., & Cai, Q. (2019). The effect of a virtual reality learning environment on learners’ spatial ability. Virtual Reality, 23(3), 385-398.
• Stotz, S., & Lee, J.S. (2018). Development of an online smartphone-based e Learning nutrition education program for low-income individuals. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav, 50, 90– 95.
• Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism –A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http//www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
• Sinsiani, A.M. Obeidat, N, Alshdaifat, E, Elsalem, L, Alwani, M.M, Rawashdeh, R, Fares, A.S, Alalawne, T, ve Tawalbeh, L.I. (2020). Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak, A cross-sectional study among medical students in North Jordan. 59, 186–194.
• Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviourism. New York – Knopf.
• Uşun, S. (2006). Uzaktan Eğitim. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.