The Effects of Writing to Learn Activities on the 10th Grade on Teaching of Ecosystem Ecology

Yıl 2024, , 652 - 667, 28.10.2024

Bilge Öztürk , Sümeyra Demiroğlu Çiçek

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1574368

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of Writing to Learning (WTL) activities on learning in teaching the subject of Ecosystem Ecology, which is taught in the biology courses in the 10th grade of high school and to examine the course process carried out with WTL activities in terms of student views.
Design/Methodology/Approach: In the research, explanatory mixed research design, one of the mixed method research designs, was used. The study group of the research consists of 87 students studying in the 10th grade of a high school in the center of Bayburt in the spring term of the 2021-2022 academic year. As a data collection tool in the research; Preliminary Knowledge Test (PKT), Ecosystem Ecology Achievement Test (EEAT) and Interview Form (IF) were used. Shapiro-Wilk Test, one of the normality tests, was used in the analysis of quantitative data. Since the data obtained from both tests used in the study did not meet the normal distribution conditions, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were applied as non-parametric tests. On the other hand, content analysis method was used to analyze qualitative data.
Findings: As a result of the analysis of the data obtained from the EEAT, it was determined that the letter and the diary from the activities of WTL increased the success of the 10th grade students in Ecosystem Ecology. Considering the letter and diary from these activities, it was determined that the letter writing activity contributed more to academic success than the diary writing activity. According to the analysis of the data obtained from the IF, it was determined that the students' views on the WTL activities were positive.
Highlights: As a result of the results obtained from the findings, it is thought that it is important to support the use of WTL activities in secondary level biology courses to increase student outcomes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Writing to learn, Ecosystem ecology, Letter, Diary, Academic achievement

Kaynakça

• Akçay, H., & Baltacı, A. (2017). Evaluation of writing to learn activities for teaching astronomy. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(1), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.305773
• Ay, A. (2018). The effect of using letter and poetry as writing to learn activities on student success in social studies program (Doktoral dissertation). Obtained from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. (Tez No. 486539)
• Beyer, B. K. (1982). Using writing to learn social studies. The Social Studies, 73(3), 100-105.
• Biber, B. (2012). Science teachers’ perceptions toward writing and levels of writing-to-learn implementations (Master thesis). Obtained from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. (Tez No. 319665)
• Bozat, Ö., & Yıldız, A. (2015). The impact of letter as one of the writing to learn activities on achievement at fifth grade electricity in our life unit. Education Sciences, 10(4), 291-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2015.10.4.1C0648
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Reflections on exams. Kalem Journal of Education and Human Sciences, 6(2), 345-356.
• Can, Ö. S., İşleyen, T., & Küçük-Demir, B. (2017). The effect of argumentation based science learning approach on probability teaching. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 12(24), 559-572.
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1998). Research methots in education (4th Edition). London: Routletge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research (4th Edition). (Trans. S. B. Demir). Ankara: Educating Book.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2014). Mixed method design selection-Mixed method research: Design and conduct (2nd Edition). (Trans. Y. Dede & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Doğan, Y., & İlhan, N. (2016). Prospective teachers’ views related to using writing to learn activities in “science and technology teaching” course. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.30690
• Duymaz, N. (2011). Use of learning-oriented writing activities and analogy production in learning the subject of the cell (Master thesis). Obtained from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. (Tez No. 290591)
• Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122-128.
• Evrekli, E., İnal, D., Balım, A. G., & Kesercioğlu, T. (2009). Pre-service science teachers' constructivism investigation of attitudes towards approach. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 22(2), 673-687.
• Fry, W. S., & Villagomez, A. (2012). Writing to learn: Benefits and limitations. College Teaching, 60(4), 170-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2012.697081
• Graham, S. (2008). Research on writing development, practice, instruction, and assesment: Introductionto a specialissue of readingandwriting. Read Write, 21, 1-2.
• Graham, S., Kiuhara, S.A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179-226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744
• Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Gunduz, S. (2006). Comparing student understanding of quantum physics when embedding multimodal representations into two different writing formats: Presentation format versus summary report format. Science Education, 90, 1092-1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20160
• Günel, M., Uzoğlu, M., & Büyükkasap, E. (2009). Effects of using writing to learn activities on learning force unit in the primary education level. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 29(1), 379-399.
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Research methods in social sciences: Philosophy-method analysis. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Teachers implementing writing to learn strategies in junior secondary science: A case study. Science Education, 86, 737-755. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10016
• Hand, B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2007). Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on year 10 biology students’ understanding of cell and molecular biology concepts. Instructional Science, 35, 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9012-3
• Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, D.L. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290165
• Hohenshell, L., Hand, B., & Staker, J. (2004). Promoting conceptual understanding of biotechnology: Writing to a younger audince. The American Biology Teacher, 66(5), 333-338. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451686
• İncirci, A., & Parmaksız, R. Ş. (2016). The effects of writing to learn (WTL) on academic achievement and attitude to lesson in english classes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2163-2173. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040928
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed research (4th Edition). (Trans. S.B. Demir). Ankara: Educating Book.
• Karadağ, S.Ş., & Öztürk, F. (2022). The effect of writing to learn activities on the academic achievement of 7th grade students on ratio, proportion and percentages. International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 8(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.47714/uebt.1160554
• Klein, P. D. (2000). Elementary students’ strategies for writing-to-learn science. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 317-348. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_2
• Koçak, G., & Seven, S. (2016). Prospective science teachers’ opinions about writing to learn: The case of one dimension motion. EKEV Academy Journal, 65, 253-268.
• Köksal, A.P. (2019). The effect of writing activities for learning purposes on the academic achievements of fifth grade students about electricity, permanence and their attitudes towards science lesson (Master thesis). Obtained from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. (Thesis No. 582870)
• Küçük-Demir, B., & İşleyen, T. (2019). The effect of the argumentation based science learning approach on the mathematics achievement of students. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 16(1), 1084-1109,
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th Edition). New York: Pearson Publishing.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Edition). California: SAGE Publications.
• Ödün-Başkıran, S. (2022). The effect of journal assisted inquiry based teaching strategy on the outcomes of biology curriculum (Doktoral dissertation). Obtained from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. (Thesis No. 721710)
• Öztürk, B., Kaymakoğlu, H., & Demiroğlu-Çiçek, S. (2022) The effect of writing to learn activities on the academic achievement of 8th grade students on periodic system. Journal of Science Teaching, 10(1), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.56423/fbod.1097724
• Öztürk, B., Öztürk, F., & Işık, A. (2016a). An investigation into the perspectives of prospective teachers on writing and writing to learn activities. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 1-15.
• Öztürk, F. (2023). Preservice preschool teachers' opinions about writing to learn mathematics and the methods they use while writing. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(3), 445-463. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.600.21
• Öztürk, F., Öztürk, B., & Işık, A. (2016b). The opinions of secondary school mathematics teachers on writing and writing-to-learn activities. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 11(2), 306-328.
• Perkins, D. N. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
• Pınar, E. (2019). The effect of diary among writing to learn activities on the success and science attitude in fourth grade science lesson (Master thesis). Obtained from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. (Thesis No. 584533)
• Prain, V., & Hand, B. (2016). Coming to know more through and from writing. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 430-434. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16672642
• Ravid, R. (1994). Pratical statistichs for educators. New York: University Pres in America.
• Rivard, L.P., & Straw, S.B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U
• Sinaga, P., & Feranie, S. (2017). Enhancing critical thinking skills and writing skills through the variation in non-traditional writing task. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 69-84.
• Thompson, G., Pilgrim, A., & Oliver, K. (2005). Self-assessment and reflective learning for first-year university geography students: A Simple guide or simply misguided?, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500290959
• Tynjala, P. (1998). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students’ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36, 209-223.
• Uzoğlu, M. (2014). The effects of diverse writing activities in learning on academic achievement, thinking skills, and laboratoryattitudes of prospective science teachers: Giresun Faculty of Education sample. Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 195-209.
• Villalon, R., & Mateos, M. (2009). Secondary and university students’ conceptions about academic writing. Journal for the Study of Education and Development:Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32(2), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1174/02103700978800
• Walker, B., Shippen, M.E., Alberto, P. Houchins, D.E., & Cihak, D.F. (2005). Using the expressive writing programme to improve the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(3), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00131.x
• Whitsed, N. (2004). Learning and teaching. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 21(1), 74-77.
• Wright, K. L., Hodges, T. S., Zimmer W. K., & McTigue, E. M. (2019). Writing-to-learn in secondary science classes: For whom is it effective?. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(4), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1541769
• Yaman, E. (2008). The art of writing written expression. Ankara: Savaş Publishing.
• Yıldız, A. (2014). Letter as a wrıtıng to learn actıvıty and ıts effectıve use. Turkish Studies, 9(5), 2097-2104.
• Yore, D.L., Bisanz L.G., & Hand, M.B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science and Education, 25(6), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018