Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Technology Use in Special Education: An Examination of Special Education Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Implementation Skills

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 67 - 80, 31.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1877963

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to examine the level of technology use among special education teachers within educational settings. Specifically, the research investigates teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) awareness and implementation skills in relation to demographic variables such as gender, age, professional experience, type of school, and student level.
Method: Employing a mixed method research design, the study integrates quantitative and qualitative data to enable an in-depth and multifaceted analysis. Quantitative data were gathered through the TPACK-Application Scale, while qualitative insights were obtained via semi-structured interviews. The study sample consisted of 130 special education teachers working in schools operating under the Kastamonu Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of National Education. The qualitative part of the research was conducted with 11 teachers.
Findings: The quantitative findings demonstrated no statistically significant differences in TPACK-Application scores based on gender, age, or professional experience. However, technology use skills varied according to the student groups with whom teachers worked. Teachers educating students with severe disabilities and those with autism spectrum disorder exhibited higher levels of technology integration skills than teachers working with students with mild special needs. Moreover, teachers working in practice schools and primary schools displayed significantly higher levels of technology awareness and implementation skills compared to their counterparts in kindergarten and middle school settings. These results underscore the influence of student needs on teachers’ technology integration practices. Qualitative data further indicated that limitations to effective technology use stem from infrastructure inadequacies, diverse student needs, socioeconomic constraints, and teachers’ professional development requirements.
Highlights: The discussions revealed that there are differences in access to technology among schools, that teachers are willing to integrate technology but need digital tools and materials adapted to special education; therefore, there is a need to strengthen infrastructure, enhance professional development, and develop individualized digital learning strategies.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, S. E., & Putman, R. S. (2020). Special education teachers’ experience, confidence, beliefs, and knowledge about integrating technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836409
  • Aslan, C. (2018). Special education teachers' attitudes towards assistive technologies. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 102-120.
  • Avan, Ç. (2023). Overcoming barriers with STEM (Unpublished TÜBİTAK project final report, Project No. 222B089). TÜBİTAK.
  • Ay, Y. (2015). Evaluation of teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) skills within the framework of practical model [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Osmangazi University.
  • Bat, Y., & Uğur Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2022). Self-efficacy levels of teachers in using technological formation and teaching materials. In Proceedings of the 15th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium (p. 143–165). Holistence Publications. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=faekEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Cahyani, L. A., Azizah, N., & Evans, D. (2021). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of special education teachers in science instruction for students with special needs. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.8580
  • Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. SAGE.
  • Çay, E., Yıkmış, A., & Özgüç, C. S. (2020). Experiences and opinions of special education teachers regarding the use of technology in special education. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(2), 629-648. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.9m
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications (Vol. 2). Pegem Academy.
  • Demirok, M. S., & Baglama, B. (2018). Examining technological and pedagogical content knowledge of special education teachers based on various variables. TEM Journal, 7(3), 507.
  • Demirok, M. S., Haksız, M., & Nuri, C. (2019). Examining the attitudes of special education teachers towards the use of assistive technology. Journal of Life Skills Psychology, 3(5), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.500699
  • Gül, M. D., & Sönmez, S. (2023). Investigation of special education teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge application competency levels. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 12(3), 701-714. https://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.1253727
  • Karaaslan, Ć., Akdemir, B., & Yavuz, M. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between technological and pedagogical content knowledge levels and self-efficacy beliefs of special education teacher candidates. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 2932-2953.
  • Kutlu, M., Schreglmann, S., & Cinisli, N. A. (2018). The opinions of teachers working in the field of special education on the use of assistive technologies in special education. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(1), 1540-1569. http://dx.doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2018.115
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  • Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Sage.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim program [Science course curriculum]. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018). Regulation on special education services. https://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/1963
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2022). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2021/’22. Ministry Of National Education Strategy Development Presidency.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2023). Ministry of National Education 2023 performance program. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2023_08/24152223_2023_YYlY_Performans_ProgramY.pdf
  • Ocak, G., Adalıoğlu, C., & Yurtseven, R. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy perceptions and motivation levels of special education teachers. Kırklareli University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 39-70. https://doi.org/10.47140/kusbder.1245023
  • Peng, C. A., & Daud, S. M. (2016, January). Relationship between Special Education (hearing impairment) teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and their attitudes toward ICT integration. In International conference on special education in southeast asia region 6th series 2016 (pp. 1-3).
  • Ramakrishnan, R., Salleh, N. M., & Alias, A. (2019). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge among vocational special education teachers. Religación: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(20), 144-149.
  • Regulation on Special Education Services (2018). Official Gazette [Resmî Gazete] (No. 30471). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/20180707-8.htm
  • Seldura, J. B. L., Doruelo, M. E. Y., Bual, J. M., & Madrigal, D. V. (2024). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge of physical education teachers in selected private junior high schools. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 18(5), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJARR/2024/v18i5632
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
  • Yurdakul, I. K., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012

Özel Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımı: Özel Eğitim Öğretmenlerinin Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi ve Uygulama Becerileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1, 67 - 80, 31.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1877963

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, özel eğitim öğretmenlerinin eğitim ortamlarında teknoloji kullanım düzeylerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, öğretmenlerin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPACK) farkındalıkları ve uygulama becerileri; cinsiyet, yaş, mesleki deneyim, okul türü ve öğrenci düzeyi gibi demografik değişkenler doğrultusunda değerlendirilmiştir.
Yöntem: Araştırma, nicel ve nitel verilerin bütüncül bir biçimde analiz edilmesine imkân tanıyan karma yöntem deseniyle yürütülmüştür. Nicel veriler TPACK-Uygulama Ölçeği ile toplanırken, nitel veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Çalışmanın örneklemini Kastamonu İl Millî Eğitim Müdürlüğüne bağlı okullarda görev yapan 130 özel eğitim öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın nitel bölümü 11 kişi ile yürütülmüştür.
Bulgular: Nicel bulgular, öğretmenlerin cinsiyet, yaş ve mesleki deneyim değişkenleri açısından TPACK-Uygulama Ölçeği puanlarında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Bununla birlikte, öğretmenlerin teknoloji kullanım becerilerinin çalıştıkları öğrenci düzeyine göre değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Ağır düzeyde yetersizliği olan öğrenciler ve otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan öğrencilerle çalışan öğretmenlerin teknoloji entegrasyon becerilerinin, hafif düzeyde özel gereksinimi olan öğrencilerle çalışan öğretmenlere göre daha yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır. Ayrıca uygulama okulu ve ilkokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin teknoloji farkındalığı ve uygulama becerilerinin okul öncesi ve ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlere kıyasla anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Bu durum, öğrencilerin bireysel gereksinimlerinin öğretmenlerin teknoloji entegrasyon pratiklerini şekillendirdiğini göstermektedir. Nitel bulgular ise etkili teknoloji kullanımını sınırlayan faktörlerin altyapı eksiklikleri, öğrenci özellikleri, sosyoekonomik koşullar ve öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişim ihtiyaçları olduğunu göstermiştir.
Önemli Vurgular: Görüşmeler, okullar arasında teknolojiye erişimde farklılıklar bulunduğunu, öğretmenlerin teknoloji entegrasyonuna istekli olduklarını ancak özel eğitime uyarlanmış dijital araç ve materyallere ihtiyaç duyduklarını; bu nedenle altyapının güçlendirilmesi, mesleki gelişimin artırılması ve bireyselleştirilmiş dijital öğrenme stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, S. E., & Putman, R. S. (2020). Special education teachers’ experience, confidence, beliefs, and knowledge about integrating technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836409
  • Aslan, C. (2018). Special education teachers' attitudes towards assistive technologies. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 102-120.
  • Avan, Ç. (2023). Overcoming barriers with STEM (Unpublished TÜBİTAK project final report, Project No. 222B089). TÜBİTAK.
  • Ay, Y. (2015). Evaluation of teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) skills within the framework of practical model [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Osmangazi University.
  • Bat, Y., & Uğur Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2022). Self-efficacy levels of teachers in using technological formation and teaching materials. In Proceedings of the 15th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium (p. 143–165). Holistence Publications. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=faekEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Cahyani, L. A., Azizah, N., & Evans, D. (2021). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of special education teachers in science instruction for students with special needs. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.8580
  • Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. SAGE.
  • Çay, E., Yıkmış, A., & Özgüç, C. S. (2020). Experiences and opinions of special education teachers regarding the use of technology in special education. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(2), 629-648. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.9m
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications (Vol. 2). Pegem Academy.
  • Demirok, M. S., & Baglama, B. (2018). Examining technological and pedagogical content knowledge of special education teachers based on various variables. TEM Journal, 7(3), 507.
  • Demirok, M. S., Haksız, M., & Nuri, C. (2019). Examining the attitudes of special education teachers towards the use of assistive technology. Journal of Life Skills Psychology, 3(5), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.500699
  • Gül, M. D., & Sönmez, S. (2023). Investigation of special education teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge application competency levels. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 12(3), 701-714. https://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.1253727
  • Karaaslan, Ć., Akdemir, B., & Yavuz, M. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between technological and pedagogical content knowledge levels and self-efficacy beliefs of special education teacher candidates. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 2932-2953.
  • Kutlu, M., Schreglmann, S., & Cinisli, N. A. (2018). The opinions of teachers working in the field of special education on the use of assistive technologies in special education. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(1), 1540-1569. http://dx.doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2018.115
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  • Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Sage.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim program [Science course curriculum]. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018). Regulation on special education services. https://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/1963
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2022). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2021/’22. Ministry Of National Education Strategy Development Presidency.
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2023). Ministry of National Education 2023 performance program. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2023_08/24152223_2023_YYlY_Performans_ProgramY.pdf
  • Ocak, G., Adalıoğlu, C., & Yurtseven, R. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy perceptions and motivation levels of special education teachers. Kırklareli University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 39-70. https://doi.org/10.47140/kusbder.1245023
  • Peng, C. A., & Daud, S. M. (2016, January). Relationship between Special Education (hearing impairment) teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and their attitudes toward ICT integration. In International conference on special education in southeast asia region 6th series 2016 (pp. 1-3).
  • Ramakrishnan, R., Salleh, N. M., & Alias, A. (2019). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge among vocational special education teachers. Religación: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(20), 144-149.
  • Regulation on Special Education Services (2018). Official Gazette [Resmî Gazete] (No. 30471). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/20180707-8.htm
  • Seldura, J. B. L., Doruelo, M. E. Y., Bual, J. M., & Madrigal, D. V. (2024). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge of physical education teachers in selected private junior high schools. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 18(5), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJARR/2024/v18i5632
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  • Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
  • Yurdakul, I. K., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Çağrı Avan

Halil İbrahim Akyüz

Gönderilme Tarihi 21 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi 13 Kasım 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2026 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Avan, Ç., & Akyüz, H. İ. (2026). Technology Use in Special Education: An Examination of Special Education Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Implementation Skills. Kastamonu Education Journal, 34(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1877963

10037