Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers' Knowledge and Views

Elif Yalvaç Ertuğrul; Salih Ateş

doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939304

EN TR

Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers' Knowledge and Views

Öz

Developing preservice teachers’ scientific inquiry skills is an important goal of teacher education because these skills support critical thinking and problem solving. This study examined how a training program integrating formative assessment with scientific inquiry influenced preservice science teachers’ knowledge of and views about scientific inquiry. A qualitative case study was conducted with 15 fourth-year preservice science teachers. Data were collected through the Scientific Inquiry Inventory (SII) (pre–post), the Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) questionnaire (Lederman et al., 2014), semi-structured interviews, and reflective journals. The intervention consisted of an 18-week training program including four inquiry-based activities integrating formative assessment. Descriptive analysis examined preservice teachers’ knowledge and views, while content analysis was used for their opinions about the training. Results showed clear improvements in preservice teachers’ knowledge of and views about scientific inquiry. Participants reported that integrating formative assessment within inquiry supported deeper understanding, student engagement, and lasting learning. However, some components, particularly research report writing, remained challenging. Integrating formative assessment with inquiry-based practices in teacher education can support preservice teachers’ inquiry competencies. Structured feedback and reflection opportunities may further strengthen these skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Scientific inquiry, Formative assessment, Preservice science teachers

Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme ile Desteklenmiş Araştırma Sorgulama Uygulamaları: Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilgi ve Görüşlerindeki Değişimler

Öz

Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının araştırma sorgulama becerilerini geliştirmek öğretmen eğitimi açısından önemlidir; çünkü bu beceriler günümüzün bilimsel ve toplumsal sorunlarını ele alabilmek için gerekli olan eleştirel düşünme ve problem çözme yetilerini destekler. Bu çalışmanın amacı, biçimlendirici değerlendirmeyi içeren bir eğitim programı aracılığıyla fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının araştırma sorgulamaya ilişkin bilgi ve görüşlerini geliştirmektir. Araştırma, dördüncü sınıfta öğrenim gören 15 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı ile yürütülen nitel bir durum çalışmasıdır. Veriler, Araştırma Sorgulama Envanteri (ön test–son test), Araştırma Sorgulama Görüşleri anketi (Lederman vd., 2014), yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ve yansıtıcı günlükler aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Uygulama süreci, biçimlendirici değerlendirmeyi içeren dört araştırma sorgulama etkinliğinden oluşan 18 haftalık bir eğitim programını kapsamaktadır. Öğretmen adaylarının araştırma sorgulamaya ilişkin bilgi ve görüşlerini incelemek için betimsel analiz; eğitime yönelik görüşlerini incelemek için içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, öğretmen adaylarının araştırma sorgulamaya ilişkin bilgi ve görüşlerinde dikkate değer gelişmeler olduğunu göstermiştir. Katılımcılar, biçimlendirici değerlendirme ile bütünleştirilen araştırma sorgulama etkinliklerinin derin öğrenmeyi, öğrenci katılımını ve kalıcı öğrenmeyi desteklediğini belirtmiştir. Bununla birlikte, araştırma raporu yazma gibi bazı bileşenlerin katılımcılar için zorlayıcı olmaya devam ettiği görülmüştür. Sonuçlar öğretmen eğitimi programlarında biçimlendirici değerlendirmenin araştırma sorgulama ile bütünleştirilmesinin öğretmen adaylarının araştırma sorgulama yeterliklerini destekleyebileceğini göstermektedir. Araştırma sorgulama etkinlikleri sırasında yapılandırılmış geri bildirim sağlanması ve yansıtma fırsatlarının sunulması bu becerileri daha da güçlendirebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Araştırma sorgulama yöntemi, Biçimlendirici değerlendirme, Fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları

Kaynakça

Al- Momani, F. (2019). Qualitative study: an analysis of pre-service science teachers' understanding about scientific inquiry and their confidence in inquiry-based science pedagogy. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/10-5-07
Arabacıoğlu, S. (2019). Evaluating and improving teachers' inquiry-based science practices. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University.
Arnold, J. C., Boone, W. J., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2018). Assessment of competencies in scientific inquiry through the application of rasch measurement techniques. Education Sciences, 8(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040184
Ateş, S. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının değişkenleri belirleme ve kontrol etme yeteneklerinin geliştirilmesi. [Development of preservice teachers’ abilities to identify and control variables]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (1), 21-39.
Ateş, S. & İnaltun, H. (2018). Fen bilimleri sınıflarında biçimlendirici ölçme ve değerlendirme. [Formative assessment in science classrooms]. Palme Yayıncılık.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Chang, B.,Wang, H.Y., Peng, T.Y., & Hsu, Y.S. (2010). Development and evaluation of a city-wide wireless weather sensor network. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 270–280.
Chi, S., Wang, Z. & Liu, X. (2021). Moderating effects of teacher feedback on the associations among inquiry-based science practices and students’ science related attitudes and beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 43(14), 2426-2456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1968532
Concannon, J. P., Brown, P. L., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2020). Investigating the development of secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 906-933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1742399

Crawford, B.A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.
Çiğdemoğlu, C. & Köseoğlu, F. (2019). Improving science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 28, 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00054-0
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay‐Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939.
Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers' cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational psychology review, 15(2), 147-179.
Grob, R., Holmeier, M. & Labudde, P. (2021). Analysing formal formative assessment activities in the context of inquiry at primary and upper secondary school in Switzerland. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663453
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E. & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 1-25.
Hodson, D. (1996). Beating the black box: Bringing technology home in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 249-269.
İnel-Ekici, D. & Ekici, M. (2021). Mobile inquiry and inquiry based science learning in higher education: Advantages, challenges, and attitudes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 427-444.
Karaman, A. (2007). Exploring the meaning of practicing classroom inquiry from the perspectives of national board certified science teachers. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Florida State University
Karışan, D., Bilican, K., & Şenler, B. (2017). The adaptation of the views about scientific inquiry questionnaire: A validity and reliability study. İnonü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 326-343.
Köksalan, S. (2019). Examining the effects of formative assessment used in inquiry-based teaching on students' attitudes towards physics course and conceptual learning. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Marmara University.
Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R.J., van den Berg, E. & Schuitema, J.A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 413-439.
Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 301–317). Springer.
Lederman, J.S., Lederman, N.G., Bartos, S.A., Bartels, S.L., Meyer, A.A., & Schwartz, R.S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry: The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
Lederman N.G. & Lederman J.S. (2019). Teaching and learning of nature of scientific knowledge and scientific ınquiry: building capacity through systematic research-based professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737-762.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science lesson curriculum].
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2024). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science lesson curriculum].
Minner, Levy & Century (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
Moss, C. M. & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD.
Murphy, C., Smith, G. & Broderick, N. (2019). A starting point: provide children opportunities to engage with scientific ınquiry and nature of science. Research in Science Education, 51, 1759–1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9825-0
National Research Council (2014). Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. National Academies Press.
Nishizuka, K. (2022). From assessment for learning to assessment for expansion: Proposing a new paradigm of assessment as a sociocultural practice. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v16i3.6976
Önen-Öztürk, F. (2016). Using the history of science to teach scientific inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 28-47.
Penn, M., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). South African grade 12 science students’ understandings of scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 31(3), 635-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00259-2
Plummer, J. ve Özçelik, A. (2015). Preservice teachers developing coherent inquiry investigations in elementary astronomy. Science Education, 99(5), 932-957. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21180.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227.
Pozo, J. I., & Gomez Crespo, M. A. (2005). The embodied nature of implicit theories: The consistency of ideas about the nature of matter. Cognition and instruction, 23(3), 351-387.
Reynolds, W. and Park, S. (2020). Examining the relationship between the educative teacher performance assessment and preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 721-748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21676
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to preparing science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 613-653.
Stiggins, R. (2008). A call for the development of balanced assessment systems. ETS Assessment Training Institute.
Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148
Talanquer,V, Tomanek, D. & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students’ understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21074
Treagust, D. F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J. L. ve Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science Education, 85(2), 137-157.
Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff R. P. & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry based science education: Towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers, International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660
Ünlü, P. (2021). Reflections of prospective science teachers on home science practices based on open-ended inquiry. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Akdeniz University.
Valente, B., Maurício, P., & Faria, C. (2024). The influence of real-context scientific activities on preservice elementary teachers’ thinking and practice of nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 33(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00377-5
Vogt, F., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). Assessing biology pre-service teachers’ professional vision of teaching scientific inquiry. Education Sciences, 10(11), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110332
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yoon, H. G., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: Difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 589-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9212-y

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Okul Öncesi Eğitim

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Elif Yalvaç Ertuğrul ^*
0000-0003-4668-7525
Türkiye

Salih Ateş
0000-0003-0425-0982
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Kasım 2025

Kabul Tarihi

26 Mart 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939304

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA79HG27JF

APA

Yalvaç Ertuğrul, E., & Ateş, S. (2026). Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views. Kastamonu Education Journal, 34(2), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939304

AMA

1.Yalvaç Ertuğrul E, Ateş S. Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2026;34(2):271-289. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939304

Chicago

Yalvaç Ertuğrul, Elif, ve Salih Ateş. 2026. “Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views”. Kastamonu Education Journal 34 (2): 271-89. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939304.

EndNote

Yalvaç Ertuğrul E, Ateş S (01 Nisan 2026) Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views. Kastamonu Education Journal 34 2 271–289.

IEEE

[1]E. Yalvaç Ertuğrul ve S. Ateş, “Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 34, sy 2, ss. 271–289, Nis. 2026, doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.1939304.

ISNAD

Yalvaç Ertuğrul, Elif - Ateş, Salih. “Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views”. Kastamonu Education Journal 34/2 (01 Nisan 2026): 271-289. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1939304.

JAMA

1.Yalvaç Ertuğrul E, Ateş S. Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2026;34:271–289.

MLA

Yalvaç Ertuğrul, Elif, ve Salih Ateş. “Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 34, sy 2, Nisan 2026, ss. 271-89, doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939304.

Vancouver

1.Elif Yalvaç Ertuğrul, Salih Ateş. Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Views. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 01 Nisan 2026;34(2):271-89. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.1939304

Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY) ile lisanslanmıştır.

Formative Assessment Embedded Scientific Inquiry Practices: Changes in Pre-Service Science Teachers' Knowledge and Views

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biçimlendirici Değerlendirme ile Desteklenmiş Araştırma Sorgulama Uygulamaları: Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilgi ve Görüşlerindeki Değişimler

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster