Araştırma Makalesi

Toplumsal Buradalık ve Öğretimsel Buradalığın Bilişsel Buradalığı Yordama Gücü

Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4 15 Temmuz 2017
Ebru Öztürk , Mukaddes Erdem , Deniz Deryakulu
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence

Öz

Community of Inquiry Model defines operations and behaviors required for the construction of knowledge and meaning in online or blended learning environments according to the development of cognitive, social and teaching presence structures. Even though the dynamic relationship between these three factors was verified by many researchers, some others criticized the model suggesting that the effect of social presence on cognitive presence was insignificant. The purpose of this study, which was designed to discuss the criticisms directed to the model, is to explore whether social and teaching presence in the Facebook groups that were formed in accordance with the community of inquiry model predict cognitive presence or not. The study was conducted with a semi-experimental design.Data were obtained according to the Community of Inquiry Scale. Regression analysis was employed in the analysis of data. The analytical results indicated that social and teaching presence were significant predictors of cognitive presence, and social presence explained the majority of variance in cognitive presence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

community of inquiry framework,social presence,cognitive presence and teaching presence

Kaynakça

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(2-3), 3-23.
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. Internet & Higher Education, 14(3), 183-190.
  3. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2014). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), 3–22.
  4. Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 65–83.
  5. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presen-ce in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1- 17.
  6. Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 12, (5), 50-56.
  7. Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 57- 68.
  8. Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K.P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Inter-net and Higher Education. 11 (3-4), 133-136.
  9. Archibald, D. (2010). Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Educa-tion, 13(1-2), 73–74.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2012). Bi-limsel araştırma yöntemleri (13.Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Öztürk, E., Erdem, M., & Deryakulu, D. (2017). The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(4), 1319-1336. https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ
AMA
1.Öztürk E, Erdem M, Deryakulu D. The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2017;25(4):1319-1336. https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ
Chicago
Öztürk, Ebru, Mukaddes Erdem, ve Deniz Deryakulu. 2017. “The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence”. Kastamonu Education Journal 25 (4): 1319-36. https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ.
EndNote
Öztürk E, Erdem M, Deryakulu D (01 Temmuz 2017) The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence. Kastamonu Education Journal 25 4 1319–1336.
IEEE
[1]E. Öztürk, M. Erdem, ve D. Deryakulu, “The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence”, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, c. 25, sy 4, ss. 1319–1336, Tem. 2017, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ
ISNAD
Öztürk, Ebru - Erdem, Mukaddes - Deryakulu, Deniz. “The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence”. Kastamonu Education Journal 25/4 (01 Temmuz 2017): 1319-1336. https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ.
JAMA
1.Öztürk E, Erdem M, Deryakulu D. The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2017;25:1319–1336.
MLA
Öztürk, Ebru, vd. “The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence”. Kastamonu Education Journal, c. 25, sy 4, Temmuz 2017, ss. 1319-36, https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ.
Vancouver
1.Ebru Öztürk, Mukaddes Erdem, Deniz Deryakulu. The Predictive Power Of Social and Teaching Presence On Cognitive Presence. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Temmuz 2017;25(4):1319-36. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA54EA76FJ