İŞ DOYUMU İLE ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: İLKÖĞRETİM OKULLARINDA BİR UYGULAMA

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 253 - 268, 15.01.2015

Zülfü Demirtaş

Öz

Araştırmada açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri yapılan TSS ve OCS ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların iş doyumu ve örgütsel bağlılıkları yüksek düzeydedir. İş doyumu ile ilgili olarak katılımcı algıları arasında cinsiyet, kıdem, yaş, statü ve branş değişkenlerinde anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmamaktadır. Örgütsel bağlılık algıları arasında cinsiyet, kıdem ve yaşa göre anlamlı farklılıklar olmamasına rağmen; yöneticiler öğretmenlerden, sınıf öğretmenleri branş öğretmenlerinden daha yüksek örgütsel bağlılığa sahiptirler. İş doyumu ile örgütsel bağlılık arasında pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Bu ilişkide değişkenlerden herhangi birisi diğerinin nedeni ya da sonucu değildir. İş doyumu ve örgütsel bağlılık birbirlerini karşılıklı olarak etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İş doyumu, Örgütsel Bağlılık, İlköğretim, Öğretmen

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: A STUDY ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Öz

In this study, the measures TSS and OCS were used and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied. Participants have high levels of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. With regard to job satisfaction, no significant differences were found in terms of participants’ variables of gender, seniority, age, status or branch. The perceptions of organizational commitment do not have significant differences in terms of gender, seniority or age however it was found that administrators have higher levels of organizational commitment than teachers and also class teachers have higher levels of organizational commitment than branch teachers. There is a significant and positive correlation between job satisfaction and organizational commitment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Job satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Elementary Education, Teacher, Administrator

Kaynakça

• Açıkalın, C. (2011). The effect of internal and external satisfaction on organizational commitment: Eskisehir is the example of productive sector. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 31, 237-254.
• Akar, C. and Yıldırım, Y.T. (2008). The relationships among organizational commitment, job sa- tisfaction and role stressors of managers : An area application in white meat (poultry and fish) sector with structural equation model. Gazi University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(2), 97-113.
• Akın, U. and Koçak, R. (2007). The relationship between teachers; classroom management skills and job satisfaction. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 51, 353-370.
• Akşit Aşık, N. (2010). A conceptual evaluation of individual and organizational factors affecting employees’ and results of job satisfaction. Turkish Journal of Administration, 467, 31-51.
• Al-Aameri, A.S. (2000). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment for nurses. Saudi Medical Journal, 21(6), 531-535.
• Allen, N. J., and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
• Allen, N. J., and Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the or- ganization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276.
• Alnaijar, A.A. (1996). Relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among employees in the United Arab Emirates. Psychological Reports, 79(1), 315-321.
• Arbuckle, J.L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 585-611.
• Ayan, S., Kocacık, F. and Karakuş, H. (2009). Job satisfaction levels of high school teachers and affecting personal and institutional factors: A study of Sivas city. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 10, 18-25.
• Ayık, A. (2000). The Effects of the behaviour of administrative staff on the performance of teachers at primary schools. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Atatürk University, Erzurum.
• Balay, R. (2000). Organizational commitment. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Balkar, B. (2009). The opinions of teachers on the effects of the administrative behaviors of school principals on teachers’ job satisfaction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 273-282.
• Bayrak Kök, S. (2006) A study to examine job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1), 291-317.
• Bayram, N. (2010). Structural equation modeling: AMOS applications. Istanbul: Ezgi Publishing.
• Brown, D. and Sargeant, M.A. (2007). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and religious com- mitment of full-time university employees. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 16, 211–241.
• Caldwell, D., Chatman, J. and O’Reilly, C. (1990). Building organizational commitment: A multi- firm study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(3), 245-261.
• Currivan, D.B. (1999). The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 495-524.
• Çekmecelioğlu H. (2006). The assess of attitudes of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on the intention to live and efficiency. Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 8(2), 154-168.
• Çinar İ. and Kavlak, O. (2009). The investigation the factors that effect the job satisfaction in ambulance and first aid care technique in Izmir. Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(3), 33-37.
• Çoban, D., and Demirtaş, H. (2011). The relationship between the level of schools’ academic optimism and teachers’ organizational commitment. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 317-348.
• Demirtaş, Z. (2010). Teachers’ job satisfaction levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1069–1073.
• Demirtaş, Z. and Ersözlü, A. (2010). Levels of job satisfaction of teachers working in high schools. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 5(1), 198-208.
• Dirani, K.M. and Kuchinke, K.P. (2011). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Validat- ing the Arabic satisfaction and commitment questionnaire (ASCQ), testing the correlations, and investigating the effects of demographic variables in the Lebanese banking sector. The Interna- tional Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(5), 1180–1202.
• Durmaz, I. (2003). Job satisfaction and organizational loyalty: An application of Turkish Armed Forces. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Defense Sciences Institute, Army Command Academy, Ankara.
• Erdem, M. (2010). Quality of work life and its relation to organizational commitment according to te- achers in secondary schools. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 511-536.
• Erel, E. (2004). The Job satisfactions of the branch teachers working at primary schools. Unpublis- hed Master’s thesis. Gazi University, Ankara.
• Gençer, A. (2002). The Relationships between teacher`s job satisfaction and burnout in Turkish pub- lic schools. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
• Glisson, C. and Durick, M. (1988). Predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 61-81.
• Güçlü, N. and Zaman, O. (2011). The relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment of school counselors assigned to the outside. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 9(3), 3: 541-576.
• Gülova, A.A. and Demirsoy, Ö. (2012). The relationship between organizational culture and organi- zational commitment: an empirical research on employees of service sector. Business and Eco- nomics Research Journal, 3(3), 49-76.
• Günbayı, İ. (1999). The Primary school and junior high school teacher’s job satisfaction in compul- sory education. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Ho, C.L. and Au, W.T. (2006). Teaching satisfaction scale: measuring job satisfaction of teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 172-185.
• Hu, L. and Bentler, M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Huang, C.C., You, C.S. and Tsai, M.T. (2012). A multidimensional analysis of ethical climate, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Nursing Ethics, 19, no 4: 513–529.
• Kahveci, G. (2010). The relationship between organizational silence and organizational commitment in primary schools. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Fırat University, Elazığ.
• Karasar, N. (1995). Scientific research method. Ankara: 3A publishing.
• Karslı, M.D. (2006). Effective school leadership. Istanbul: Morpa.
• Kitapçıoğlu, G. (2000). Determining factors of job difficulty and job satisfaction, burnout, impact on organizational commitment. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ege University, İzmir.
• Lambert, E.G. (1999). A path analysis of the antecedents and consequences of job satisfaction and organizational commitment among correctional staff (tunover and absenteeism). Unpublished PhD. Thesis. State University of Newyork at Albeny.
• Lawrence, A., and Lawrence, P. (2009). Values congruence and organizational commitment: P—O fit in higher education institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(4), 297-314.
• Mahmutoğlu, A. (2007). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment level at the central organization of the Ministry of National Education. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
• Markovits, Y, Davis, A.J., Fay, D., and Dick, R.V. (2010): The link between job satisfaction and orga- nizational commitment: differences between public and private sector employees, International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 177-196.
• Mottaz, C.J. (1987). An analysis of the relationship between work satisfaction and organizational commitment. The Sociological Quarterly, 28(4), 541-558.
• Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M. and Porter, L.W., (1979). The measurement of organizational commit- ment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
• Paknadel (Çetinkanat), A.C. (1988). Organizational climate and job satisfaction. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. Hacettepe University; Ankara.
• Raza, M.A. and Nawaz, M.M. (2011). Impact of job enrichment on employees’ job satisfaction, motivation and organizational commitment: evidence from public sector of Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 220-226.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and sample applications. Turkish Psychological Articles, 3(5), 49-74.
• Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Basic principles and applications of LISREL. Ankara: Ekinoks.
• Taşdan, M. and Tiryaki, E. (2008). Comparison of the level of job satisfaction between at private and state primary school teachers. Education and Science, 33(147), 54–70.
• Tok, T.N. (2004). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment level of elementary supervisors. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Ankara University, Ankara.
• Uyguç, N. and Çımrın, D. (2004); Organizational commitment and turnover intentions of the central factors affecting laboratory workers. Dokuz Eylül University, Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 19(1), 91-99.
• Varlık, T. (2000). Job satisfaction of public and private primary school teachers (Ankara city as example). Unpublished Master’s thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Weiss, H.M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173–194.
• Wu, L. and Norman, I.J. (2006). An investigation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and role conflict and ambiguity in a sample of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 26, 304–314.
• Yang, M.L. (2012). Leadership and Taiwanese public relations practitioners’ job satisfaction and or- ganizational commitment. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(1), 31-46.
• Yılmaz, K. (2012). The Relationship between Primary School Teachers’ Job Satisfaction Levels and Orga- nizational Citizenship Behaviors. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2(2), 1-15.