Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Erasmus Students’ Mobility Priorities: A Rank-Order Scaling Study

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 6, 2401 - 2412, 15.11.2017

Öz

Promoting mobility among students and staff was among the earliest European initiatives

in higher education and is still among the most visible. Bologna process has played a prominent

role in promoting mobility by establishing more compatible course patterns and encouraging

greater transparency. Student mobility involved 213,266 people distributed among the twentyseven

states of the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland, Croatia, and

Turkey. The purpose of this study is to identify the preferences studying abroad and present the

priorities of incoming and outgoing Erasmus students’ university preference among the ranked

items. According to the rank ordering scaling findings; incoming students prioritized the university

related factors while outgoing students prioritized the factors related social environment.

Kaynakça

  • Bologna Declaration (1999), Joint declaration of the European ministers of education, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna.pdf (accessed 28 November 2015).
  • Bracht, O., Engel, C., Janson, K., Over, A. Schomburg, H. and Teicher, U. (2006). The professional value of Erasmus mobility. Final Report. Kassel: International Centre for Higer Educational Reserch (INCHER-Kassel).
  • Colucci, E., Davies, H., Korhanen, J. and Gaebel, M. (2012). Mobility: closing the gap between policy and practice. Brussels: European University Association.
  • European Union. (2014). The Erasmus impact study: effects of mobility on the skills and employability of students and the internationalization of higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fombona J., Rodríguez C., Pascual S M. (2013). The motivational factor of Erasmus students at the university. International Education Studies, 6 (4) (2013), page. 1–9. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n4p1
  • Kasravi, J. (2009). Factors influencing study abroad for students of color: Moving beyond the barriers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
  • Krzaklewska E, Krupnik S (2006) Experience of studying abroad for exchange students in Europe. Research Report. Brussels: Erasmus Student Network.
  • Mitchell, K. (2012). Student mobility and European Identity: Erasmus Study as a civic experience?, Journal of Contemporary European Research. 8 (4), pp. 490‐518
  • Scott, P. (2012). Going beyond Bologna: issues and themes. Curaj, A., Scott, P., Vlasceanu, L., & Wilson, L. (eds). European higher education at the crossroads, between the bologna process and national reforms Part I. London: Springer.
  • Sigalas, E. (2009). Does Erasmus student mobility promote a European identity? Webpapers on Constitutionalalism & Governance beyond the State. ConWeb No. 2/2009, Hamburg.
  • Sweeney, S. (2012). Going mobile: internationalization, mobility and the European Higher Education Area. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. Newyork: John Wiley & Sons Inc Turgut, M. F., & Baykul, Y. (1992). Ölçekleme teknikleri. Ankara: ÖSYM Publishing.

Erasmus Öğrencilerinin Hareketlilik Öncelikleri: Bir Sıralama Ölçeği Çalışması

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 6, 2401 - 2412, 15.11.2017

Öz

Öğrenci ve personel değişim programları yükseköğretimde ilk başlarda olduğu gibi
günümüzde de önemini korumaktadır. Bologna süreci, derslerin karşılaştırılabilirliğinin
artırılması ve uluslararası geçişleri sağlaması bakımından değişim süreçlerini desteklemek
adına önemli rol oynamıştır. Bu zamana kadar 27 Avrupa Birliği devleti, İzlanda, Lihtenştayn,
Norveç, İsviçre, Hırvatistan ve Türkiye de dâhil olmak üzere toplamda 213,266 kişi öğrenci
değişim programlarına katılmıştır. Bu araştırma ile değişim programlarındaki Erasmus
öğrencilerinin üniversite seçmedeki önceliklerinin gelen ve giden öğrencilere göre ortaya
çıkarılması amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmada elde edilen sıralam ölçeği bulgularına göre gelen
öğrencilerin üniversiteye ait özellikleri dikkate aldığı; giden öğrencilerin ise sosyal çevreyi
etkileyen durumları öncelik olarak ele aldıkları belirlemiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Bologna Declaration (1999), Joint declaration of the European ministers of education, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna.pdf (accessed 28 November 2015).
  • Bracht, O., Engel, C., Janson, K., Over, A. Schomburg, H. and Teicher, U. (2006). The professional value of Erasmus mobility. Final Report. Kassel: International Centre for Higer Educational Reserch (INCHER-Kassel).
  • Colucci, E., Davies, H., Korhanen, J. and Gaebel, M. (2012). Mobility: closing the gap between policy and practice. Brussels: European University Association.
  • European Union. (2014). The Erasmus impact study: effects of mobility on the skills and employability of students and the internationalization of higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fombona J., Rodríguez C., Pascual S M. (2013). The motivational factor of Erasmus students at the university. International Education Studies, 6 (4) (2013), page. 1–9. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n4p1
  • Kasravi, J. (2009). Factors influencing study abroad for students of color: Moving beyond the barriers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
  • Krzaklewska E, Krupnik S (2006) Experience of studying abroad for exchange students in Europe. Research Report. Brussels: Erasmus Student Network.
  • Mitchell, K. (2012). Student mobility and European Identity: Erasmus Study as a civic experience?, Journal of Contemporary European Research. 8 (4), pp. 490‐518
  • Scott, P. (2012). Going beyond Bologna: issues and themes. Curaj, A., Scott, P., Vlasceanu, L., & Wilson, L. (eds). European higher education at the crossroads, between the bologna process and national reforms Part I. London: Springer.
  • Sigalas, E. (2009). Does Erasmus student mobility promote a European identity? Webpapers on Constitutionalalism & Governance beyond the State. ConWeb No. 2/2009, Hamburg.
  • Sweeney, S. (2012). Going mobile: internationalization, mobility and the European Higher Education Area. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. Newyork: John Wiley & Sons Inc Turgut, M. F., & Baykul, Y. (1992). Ölçekleme teknikleri. Ankara: ÖSYM Publishing.
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Derleme Makale
Yazarlar

Eren Halil Özberk Bu kişi benim

Nagihan Boztunç Öztürk Bu kişi benim

Leyla Yılmaz Fındık Bu kişi benim

Suzan Beyza Kaptı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Kasım 2017
Kabul Tarihi 27 Şubat 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 6

Kaynak Göster

APA Özberk, E. H., Boztunç Öztürk, N., Yılmaz Fındık, L., Kaptı, S. B. (2017). Erasmus Students’ Mobility Priorities: A Rank-Order Scaling Study. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(6), 2401-2412.

10037