Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4, 567 - 575, 29.10.2023
https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2023-0024

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aktan, O. & Sevinç, Ö. S. (2018). İlkokul Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı ders kazanımlarının yenilenen Bloom Taksonomisine ıṅ celenmesi II. International Congress of Multidisciplinary Studies, Adana. 4-5 May 2018.
  • Anderson, L. W. (1999). Rethinking Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for testing and assessment. Department of Education.Reports. ED 435630.

Analysis of Sample Science Questions for Secondary School Exam in terms of Revised Bloom Taxonomy

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4, 567 - 575, 29.10.2023
https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2023-0024

Öz

Purpose: In this research, it is aimed to examine the sample questions for the exam in high school transition system published between 2018-2022 according to the revised bloom taxonomy.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The document analysis model was used and The data source of this research is the science questions in the sample questions for the central examination for secondary education institutions to admit students by examination published on the website of the General Directorate of Measurement, Evaluation and Examination by the Ministry of National Education since October 2018. Between October 2018 and December 2022, a total of 355 science questions were published and in this study all of these questions examined according to the revised bloom taxonomy.
Findings: Most of the sample questions examined are within the scope of conceptual questions. 74% of the questions published in 2018, 75% of the questions in 2019, 66% of the questions in 2020 and 2021, and 70% of the questions in 2022 are at the level of conceptual knowledge.
Highlights: Almost all of the questions are in the conceptual knowledge class and are preferred from low-level questions, and high-level questions are the last ones. Another important finding is that all of the high-level questions (58 questions) are preferred from the category “Analyze”, but not at all from the categories “Evaluate” and “Create”.

Kaynakça

  • Aktan, O. & Sevinç, Ö. S. (2018). İlkokul Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı ders kazanımlarının yenilenen Bloom Taksonomisine ıṅ celenmesi II. International Congress of Multidisciplinary Studies, Adana. 4-5 May 2018.
  • Anderson, L. W. (1999). Rethinking Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for testing and assessment. Department of Education.Reports. ED 435630.
Toplam 2 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Gülşah Zerman Kepceoğlu

Murat Pektaş

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 26 Ekim 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Ekim 2023
Kabul Tarihi 3 Mayıs 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Zerman Kepceoğlu, G., & Pektaş, M. (2023). Analysis of Sample Science Questions for Secondary School Exam in terms of Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Kastamonu Education Journal, 31(4), 567-575. https://doi.org/10.24106/KEFDERGI-2023-0024

10037