Denizcilik Alanında Bölgesel Kalkınma Odaklı Bir Üniversitenin Faydaları Üzerine Düşünceler: "Tuzla" Bölgesi Örneği

Öz

Üniversiteler yeni roller kazandıkça ve kendilerinden beklentiler arttıkça, bunları karşılamak üzere dönüşüme uğramaktadırlar. Son yıllarda ortaya çıkan beklentilerden biri de üniversitelerin bölgesel ve küresel kalkınmaya katkıda bulunmasıdır. Üniversiteler bu beklentiye cevap verebilmek için çeşitli faaliyetlerde bulunmaya başlamış ve böylece bulundukları bölgede ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel hayatın canlanmasına yardımcı olmuşlardır. Buna paralel olarak, Türkiye'deki bazı üniversiteler bölgesel kalkınma odaklı üniversiteler olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, bölgesel kalkınma odaklı üniversitelerin bulundukları bölgeye katkıları denizcilik bağlamında incelenmiş ve benzer misyona sahip denizcilik odaklı bir üniversitenin bölgeye yapabileceği katkılar tartışılmıştır. Tüm bulgular, Tuzla ilçesinde yer alan bir üniversitenin denizcilik alanında bölgesel kalkınma odaklı bir üniversite olarak belirlendiği varsayımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Böyle bir üniversitenin denizcilik kültürünün yaygınlaştırılmasından önemi giderek artan deniz ticareti için yeni paydaşlar yetiştirilmesine, kirliliğin önlenmesinden denizcilik teknolojilerinin geliştirilmesine kadar pek çok alanda katkı sağlayabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bölgesel Kalkınma
• Üniversiteler
• Denizcilik
• Beklentiler
• Faydalar

Reflections on the Benefits of a Regional Development-Oriented University in Maritime: The Case of Tuzla Region

Öz

As universities gain new roles and expectations from them increase, they are transforming to meet them. One of the expectations that has emerged in recent years is that universities should contribute to regional and global development. In order to respond to this expectation, universities have started to engage in various activities, thus helping to revitalize economic, social, and cultural life in their regions. In parallel, some universities in Turkey have been identified as regional development-oriented universities. In this study, the contributions of regional development-oriented universities to their regions are examined in the maritime context and the contributions that a maritime-oriented university with a similar mission can make to the region are discussed. Then, all findings are analyzed under the assumption that a university located in the Tuzla district is designated as a regional development-oriented university in the maritime field. It is concluded that such a university can contribute in many areas from the dissemination of maritime culture to the training of new stakeholders for the increasingly important maritime trade, from pollution prevention to the development of maritime technologies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Regional Development
• Universities
• Maritime
• Expectations
• Benefits

Kaynakça

1. Adams, B. A. (2003). Regionalism in Stanford's contribution to the Ris of Silicon Valley. Entreprise&Society, 4(3). DOI: 10.1093/es/khg025
2. Agasisti, T., Barra, C. & Zotti, R. (2019). Research, knowledge transfer, and innovation: the effect of Italian universities’ efficiency on local economic development 2006−2012 Journal of Regional Science. 59. 819-849. DOI: 10.1111/jors.12427
3. Archives.com. 2022. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/morrill-act
4. Barcellos-Paula, L., De la Vega, I.& Gil-Lafuente, AM. (2021). The quintuple helix of innovation model and the SDGs: Latin-American countries’ Case and its forgotten effects. Mathematics, 9(4) 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040416
5. Benneworth, B. & Fitjar, R. D. (2019) Contextualizing the role of universities to regional development: introduction to the special issue. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 331-338, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2019.1601593
6. Boucher, G., Conway, C. & Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of engagement by universities in their region's development. Regional Studies, 37, 887-897. 10.1080/0034340032000143896.
7. Carayannis, E.G.& Campbell, D.F.C. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 3-2.
8. Chakrabarti, A. K. & Lester, R. K. (2002). Regional economic development: comparative case studies in the US and Finland. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2. 635-642

9. Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. New York: Elsevier.
10. Compagnucci, L. & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The third mission of the university: a sysytematic review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 161, DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284.
11. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple helix – university-ındustry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14–19. Retrieved from http://www.leydesdorff.net/th1/index.htm
12. Etzkowitz H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. & Terra, B.R.C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to enterpreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
13. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-00054.
14. Fonseca, L. (2019). Designing regional development? Exploring the university of Aveiro’s role in the innovation policy process. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 186–202.
15. Fonseca, L. & Nieth, L. (2021). The role of universities in regional development strategies: A comparison across actors and policy stages. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(3), 298–315. DOI: 10.1177/0969776421999743
16. Frondizi, R., Fantauzzi, C., Colasanti, N., & Fiorani, G. (2019). The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy. Sustainability, 11(12), 3455. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11123455
17. Garlick, S. (2000) Engaging universities and regions: knowledge contribution to regional economic development in Australia. Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Report 15, Department for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.
18. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications, Inc.
19. Goddard, J., Kempton, L. & Vallance, P. (2013). Universities and smart specialisation: challenges, tensions and opportunities. Ekonomiaz, 83(ii/13), 83–102.
20. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M.& Siegel D. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1045-1057.
21. Gunasekara, C. (2006a). Universities and associative regional governance: Australian evidence in noncore metropolitan regions. Regional Studies, 40(7), 727–741.
22. Gunasekara, C. (2006b). Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional ınnovation systems. Journal of Technology Transfer. 31, 101-113.
23. Harloe, M. & Perry, B. (2004). Universities, localities and regional development: the emergence of the `mode 2' university?*. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 28(1), 212-23
24. Harwiki, W.& Malet, C. (2020). Quintuple helix and innovation on performance of SMEs within ability of SMEs as a mediator variable: A comparative study of creative industry in Indonesia and Spain. Management Science Letters, 10, 1389-1400.
25. Ikegami, M. & Romão, J. (2016). Universities and knowledge-based regional development: a comparative study on the triple helix framework in Amsterdam and Sapporo. Studies in Regional Science, 46(1), 101-113.
26. Kwiatkowski, S. (1980). The organisational problems of combining teaching and research: Humboldt, Weber, and the Polish experience. European Journal of Education, 15(4), 355– 61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1502809
27. Mora, JG., Ferreira, C., Vidal, J. et al. Higher education in Albania: developing third mission activities. Tert Educ Manag 21, 29–40 (2015). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.994556
28. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press.
29. OECD (2008). Higher education management and policy. Higher Education and Regional Development, 20(2) OECD Publishing, ISBN 9264043209, 9789264043206
30. Papadimitriou, A. (2020). Beyond rhetoric: reinventing the public mission of higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 26, 1–4.
31. Trippl, M., Sinozic, T. & Lawton-Smith, H. (2015). The role of universities in regional development: conceptual models and policy institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1722-1740.
32. Tödtling, F. &Trippl, M. (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203-1219.
33. Uyarra, E. (2010). Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities: Implications and Contradictions. European Planning Studies, 18, 1227-1246.
34. Wyckoff, A. (2013). Knowledge is Growth. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/science/knowledge-is-growth.htm
35. Wolfe, D.A. (2016). The role of universities in regional development and cluster formation. Creating Knowledge, Strengthening Nations: The Changing Role of Higher Education, (Ed) by Glen A. Jones, Patricia McCarney and Michael L. University of Toronto Press
36. YÖK. (2020). Yükseköğretimde yeni YÖK projeleri, yükseköğretimde ihtisaslaşma ve misyon farklılaşması. Bölgesel kalkınma odaklı üniversiteler. YÖK Raporu. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/2020/bolgesel_kalkinma_odakli_universiteler.pdf.