Araştırma Makalesi

A “Solitary” Narrative in Context of Cultural and Spatial Identity: Kayaköy

Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 20 Mart 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

A “Solitary” Narrative in Context of Cultural and Spatial Identity: Kayaköy

Abstract

Anatolian geography has hosted many civilizations which have been able to carry their beliefs, languages, customs and traditions, lifestyles and traces as original pieces in the multicultural mosaic of Anatolia. These "ancient" values, which have been transferred to the present day as cultural heritage, constitute the life codes of the societies that make them up. On the other hand, as the smallest part of society, man, who had to leave the space that he had created, shaped and kept alive with his own hands in one way or another from ancient times to the present, followed the traces of the society to which he most belonged, searched for its essence and questioned his "belonging". In this context, while the study seeks to find the spatial identity infrastructure, which includes the life codes of the Anatolian geography, in the social lives of societies, also aims to question the problem of belonging in context of the “forced migration” which is one of the most dramatic events in history that displaces societies in the process of nationization and detaches people from their "space”, to be able to read the place through the cultural accumulation and transfer of “exchanged lives”, to find the “lost” in the dimension of culture-space-time. There is no doubt that Kayaköy, which was chosen as the study area for this purpose deserves this attention with its experience of the forced migration in all its reality and nakedness, history, culture, unique architectural style and texture, locality, "sustainability" of the local, testimony of the period in question, abandonment and finally the “accounts” made on it by powers from different segments.

Keywords

Cultural Heritage , Spatial Identity , Traditional Architecture , Forced Migration , Kayaköy

Kaynakça

  1. Arı, K. (2000). Büyük Mübadele: Türkiye’ye Zorunlu Göç 1923-1925, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İstanbul.
  2. Edney, J. J.(1976). Human Territories: Comment On Functional Properties, Environment and Behavior, Vol 8, No. 1.
  3. Elden, S. (2009). Space I. In R. Kitchin & N. J. Thrift (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, First Education ed. Vol. 10, pp. 460.
  4. Erdal, İ. (2006). Mübadele-Uluslaşma Sürecinde Türkiye ve Yunanistan (1923-1925), IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık: İstanbul.
  5. Göregenli, M. (2010). Çevre Psikolojisi: İnsan Mekân İlişkileri, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  6. Graumann, C. F. (2002). “The Phenomenological Approach to People-Environment Studies”, Handbook of Envıronmental Psychology, Robert B. Bechtel And Arza Churchman, New York, By John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  7. Güvenç, B. (2002). İnsan ve Kültür, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  8. Ittelson, W. H. (1978). Environmental Percepton and Urban Experience. Environment and Behavior, 10 (2), 193–213.
  9. İnceoğlu, M. (2010). Tutum, Algı ve İletişim, İstanbul, Beykent Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  10. Kısa Ovalı, P. (2009). Türkiye iklim bölgeleri bağlamında ekolojik tasarım ölçütleri sistematiğinin oluşturulması: Kayaköy Yerleşmesinde Örneklenmesi, Doktora Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi, Edirne, 223s.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yamak, G., & Biçer, Ü. (2023). A “Solitary” Narrative in Context of Cultural and Spatial Identity: Kayaköy. Kent Akademisi, 16(1), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1207401