Impact of February 6, 2024 Earthquakes on Community Resilience

Öz

This study explores the interaction of people and place, the most important elements of geography, in the context of community resilience. Community resilience is the process of adaptation of a society to changing conditions by recovering from the effects of disasters as soon as possible. A resilient community is considered one of the most important components of disaster respons. In the context of increasing disaster risks, interest in increasing community resilience is growing in both academic and policy circles. This study seeks to understand how individuals affected by the February 6, 2023, earthquakes perceive resilience. These interviews were conducted as qualitative research. Typical case sampling was used in the study. Participants were selected from individuals who had experienced both earthquakes (January 24, Elazig and February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş) and equal gender distribution was sought. Interviews were conducted on July 15 and August 15, 2023, six months after the second earthquake. Interviews were conducted with 22 people, consisting of 11 female and 11 male earthquake survivors from Elazig, Kahramanmaraş, and Malatya, the three provinces affected by the earthquake. A descriptive analysis of the opinions obtained after the interviews was conducted. Similar answers were brought together, and conclusions on social resilience were evaluated in terms of social, environmental, economic, built, natura, and institutional environment dimensions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster
• Resilience
• Comunity Resilience
• Urban Resilience
• Earthquake Resilience

6 Şubat 2024 Depremlerinin Toplumsal Dirençliliğe Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, coğrafyanın en önemli unsurları olan insan ve mekânın etkileşimini toplumsal dirençlilik bağlamında araştırmaktadır. Toplumsal dirençlilik bir toplumun afetlerin etkisinde en kısa sürede kurtularak değişen koşullara uyum saplama sürecidir. Artan afet riskleri bağlamında toplumların dirençliliğini artırmaya yönelik ilgiler hem akademik hem de politik çevrelerde her geçen gün artmaktadır. Dirençli bir toplum afetle mücadelede en önemli bileşenlerden biri olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çalışma, 6 Şubat 2023 depremlerinden sonra bireylerin görüşlerinden yola çıkarak dirençlilik algılarını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu görüşmeler, nitel araştırma türünde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, tipik durum örneklemesi kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar her iki depremi de yaşamış (24 Ocak Elazığ ve 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş) bireylerden seçilmiş ve eşit cinsiyet dağılımı aranmıştır. Görüşmeler ikinci depremden altı ay sonra, 15 Temmuz-15 Ağustos 2023 tarihlerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Depremden etkilenen üç il olan Elazığ, Kahramanmaraş ve Malatya'dan 11 kadın ve 11 erkek depremzededen oluşan 22 kişi ile yüz yüze yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeler sonrasında elde edilen görüşlerin betimsel analizi yapılmıştır. Benzer cevaplar bir araya getirilerek toplumsal dirençliliğe yönelik çıkarımlar sosyal, çevre, ekonomik çevre, yapılı çevre, doğal çevre ve kurumsal çevre boyutları açısından değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet
• Dirençlilik
• Toplumsal Dirençlilik
• Kentsel Dirençlilik
• Deprem Dirençliliği

Kaynakça

1. AIDR. (2022). Australian Disaster Resilience Community Recovery Handbook. https://www.vic.gov.au/community-recovery-handbook-2
2. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social Capital and Community Resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
3. Andrews, R. j., & Quintana, L. M. (2017). Unpredictable, Unpreventable and Impersonal Medicine: Global Disaster Response in the 21st Century. In International Disaster Health Care (pp. 29–50). Apple Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315365787-10
4. Baker, S. M. (2009). Vulnerability and resilience in natural disasters: A marketing and public policy perspective. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28(1), 114–123.
5. Becker, P. (2023). Sustainability science: Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development. Elsevier.
6. Béné, C., Mehta, L., McGranahan, G., Cannon, T., Gupte, J., & Tanner, T. (2018). Resilience as a policy narrative: potentials and limits in the context of urban planning. Climate and Development, 10(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
7. Bush, J., & Doyon, A. (2019). Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: How can urban planning contribute? Cities, 95, 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
8. Büyüközkan, G; Ilıcak, Ö; Feyzioğlu, O (2022): A review of urban resilience literature. In Sustainable Cities and Society 77, p. 103579. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579.

9. Caglar, N., Vural, I., Kirtel, O., Saribiyik, A., & Sumer, Y. (2023). Structural damages observed in buildings after the January 24, 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake in Türkiye. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e01886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01886
10. Cinner, J. E., & Barnes, M. L. (2019). Social dimensions of resilience in social-ecological systems. One Earth, 1(1), 51–56.
11. Coaffee, J. (2013). Towards Next-Generation Urban Resilience in Planning Practice: From Securitization to Integrated Place Making. Planning Practice & Research, 28(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
12. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
13. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / John W. Creswell (3rd ed.). SAGE.
14. Doğulu, C., Karanci, A. N., & Ikizer, G. (2016). How do survivors perceive community resilience? The case of the 2011 earthquakes in Van, Türkiye. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 16, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.006
15. Engle, N. L., Bremond, A. de, Malone, E. L., & Moss, R. H. (2014). Towards a resilience indicator framework for making climate-change adaptation decisions. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(8), 1295–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9475-x
16. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002Ganapati, N. E. (2008). Disaster management structure in Türkiye: away from a reactive and paternalistic approach? In Disaster management handbook (pp. 311–350). CRC Press.
17. Gerdan, S., & Özdemir, A. (2017). Afet zararlarının azaltmasında toplum tabanlı gözlemsel mahalle tehlike analizi eğitimi: Kocaeli örneği. Resilience, 1(1), 11-19.
18. Gil-Rivas, V., & Kilmer, R. P. (2016). Building Community Capacity and Fostering Disaster Resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(12), 1318–1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22281
19. Gokceoglu, C. (2023). 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş – Türkiye Earthquakes: A General Overvıew. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-1-2023, 417–424. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-417-2023
20. Hoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R. (2017). Learn from the Past, Prepare for the Future: Impacts of Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand. World Development, 96, 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016
21. Holling, S., C.,. (1973): Resilience and stability of ecological systems. In Annual review of ecology and systematics 4 (1), pp. 1–23.
22. Kasapoğlu, A., Ecevit, Y., & Ecevit, M. (2004). Support Needs of the Survivors of the August 17, 1999 Earthquake in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 66(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003584.27504.f0
23. Katrina Brown, & Elizabeth Westaway (2011). Agency, Capacity, and Resilience to Environmental Change: Lessons from Human Development, Well-Being, and Disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(Volume 36, 2011), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905
24. Khan, M. A. U., & Sayem, M. A. (2013). Understanding recovery of small enterprises from natural disaster. Environmental Hazards, 12(3-4), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.761593
25. Kitagawa, K. (2021). Conceptualising ‘Disaster Education’. Education Sciences, 11(5), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050233
26. Kohn, S., Eaton, J. L., Feroz, S., Bainbridge, A. A., Hoolachan, J., & Barnett, D. J. (2012). Personal disaster preparedness: An integrative review of the literature. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 6(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.47
27. Kusumastuti, R. D., Viverita, Husodo, Z. A., Suardi, L., & Danarsari, D. N. (2014). Developing a resilience index towards natural disasters in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007
28. L Haven, T., & van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
29. Li, T., Dong, Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). A review of social-ecological system resilience: Mechanism, assessment and management. Science of the Total Environment, 723, 138113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138113
30. Masnavi, M. R., Gharai, F., & Hajibandeh, M. (2019). Exploring urban resilience thinking for its application in urban planning: A review of literature. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(1), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
31. Mayunga, J., S. (2007): Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach. In Summer academy for social vulnerability and resilience building 1 (1), pp. 1–16.
32. McLellan, B., Zhang, Q., Farzaneh, H., Utama, N. A., & Ishihara, K. N. (2012). Resilience, Sustainability and Risk Management: A Focus on Energy. Challenges, 3(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe3020153
33. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
34. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications Inc.
35. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1-2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
36. Parker, D. J., & Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (Eds.). (2022). Environmental hazards and resilience: Theory and evidence. Routledge.
37. Patriarca, R., Bergström, J., Di Gravio, G., & Costantino, F. (2018). Resilience engineering: Current status of the research and future challenges. Safety Science, 102, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.005
38. Perrings, C. (2006). Resilience and sustainable development. Environment and Development Economics, 11(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X06003020
39. Ride, A., & Di Bretherton. (2011). Community resilience in natural disasters. Springer.
40. Rapaport, C., Hornik-Lurie, T., Cohen, O., Lahad, M., Leykin, D., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2018). The relationship between community type and community resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.020
41. Romero-Lankao, P., & Gnatz, D. M. (2013). Exploring urban transformations in Latin America. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
42. Seddiky, M.A., Giggins, H., & Gajendran, T. (2020). International principles of disaster risk reduction informing NGOs strategies for community based DRR mainstreaming: The Bangladesh context. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48, 101580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101580
43. Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2018). Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning. Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
44. Sherrieb, K; Norris, F., H.; Galea, S., (2010): Measuring Capacities for Community Resilience. In Soc Indic Res 99 (2), pp. 227–247. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
45. Sozbilir, M., Kutu, H., & Yasar, M. D. (Eds.). (2012). Science Education Research in Turkey. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_14 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_14
46. TC Presidential Stratejiet al. and Budget Presidency. (2023). Kahramanmaraş and Hatay Earthquakes Report. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-Kahramanmaras-ve-Hatay-Depremleri-Raporu.pdf
47. Thorogood, Nicki, Green, Judith. (2018). Qualitative Methods for Health Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018381
48. US Geological Survey, LandScan-Graphic: Henrik Pettersson, CNN. AFAD, Instrumental Period Earthquake Catalog.
49. Unlu, A., Kapucu, N., & Sahin, B. (2010). Disaster and crisis management in Turkey: a need for a unified crisis management system. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011037977
50. Varol, N., & Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2017). Afetler karşısında toplum dirençliliği. Resilience, 1(1), 1-9.
51. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2).
52. Woods, D. D. (2015). Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018Y
53. Yıldırım Döner, S., & Demir, S. (2022). Türkçe Öğretmeni Adaylarının Başarı Yönelimleri. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1003049
54. Yodo, N., & Wang, P. (2016). Engineering Resilience Quantification and System Design Implications: A Literature Survey. Journal of Mechanical Design, 138(11). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034223