Yaşlıların Mekânsal Dışlanma Sorunu: Kent Hakkı İlkeleri ve Sosyal Hizmet Yaklaşımı

Öz

Yaşlıların şehir yaşamında deneyimledikleri mekânsal dışlanma sorununu ele alan bu çalışma, kent hakkı ilkesine dayanan sosyal hizmet müdahalelerini değerlendirmektedir. Değerlendirme, mevcut literatürün kapsamlı bir taramasına dayanmaktadır. Tarama sürecinde, ulusal ve uluslararası literatürden elde edilen veriler, ilgili anahtar kelimeler ve konular etrafında toplanmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Edinilen bilgiler, yaşlı dostu şehir projeleri, kent hakkı ilkeleri ve sosyal hizmet stratejileri açısından karşılaştırmalı bir bakış açısı sunmak üzere sistematik bir şekilde değerlendirilmiştir. Derlenen verilere göre, kamusal alanların tasarımında 'yaş' faktörünün ihmal edilmesi, yaşlılar, çocuklar ve gençler gibi gruplar için dezavantajlar doğurmakta ve yaşlı bireylerin şehir yaşamının sunduğu imkanlardan tam olarak faydalanamamalarına yol açmaktadır. Bu durum, yaşlılar arasında fiziksel, duygusal, sosyal ve ekonomik sorunlara neden olmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı, bu sorunları çözüme kavuşturmak ve yaşlıların şehir yaşamında daha aktif ve entegre bir şekilde yer almalarını sağlamak için kent hakkı ilkesine dayalı sosyal hizmet önerileri geliştirmektir. Sosyal hizmet, dezavantajlı gruplar arasında yer alan yaşlıların refahını öncelikli olarak ele almakta ve onların güçlenmelerini ve genel yaşam kalitelerini artırmayı hedeflemektedir. Özellikle şehirlerde, sosyal hizmet yaşlı bireylerin özel ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için çeşitli destekler sunarak, bu grupların şehir kaynaklarına erişimini ve fırsat eşitliğini sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, sosyal hizmetin şehir alanlarında etkinliğini artırmayı ve yaşlı bireylerin hakları konusunda toplumsal farkındalık ve savunuculuk çalışmalarını teşvik etmeyi benimsemektedir. Sosyal hizmetin katılımcı bu stratejisinin, yaşlı bireylerin şehir yaşamındaki rolünü güçlendireceği ve daha kapsayıcı ve adil şehirler yaratılmasına katkıda bulunacağı savunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kent hakkı
• mekânsal dışlanma
• sosyal hizmet
• yaşlılık

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen herhangi bir kurum yok.

Proje Numarası

ORCID: 0000-0002-7821-5605

Etik Beyan

Bu makalede etik kurul iznine gerek yoktur, buna ilişkin ıslak imzalı etik kurul kararı gerekmediğine ilişkin onam formu sistem üzerindeki makale süreci dosyalarına eklenmiştir.

The Problem of Spatial Exclusion of the Aged: Urban Right Principles and Social Work Approach

Öz

Addressing the problem of spatial exclusion experienced by the older adults in urban life, this study evaluates social service interventions based on the principle of the right to the city. The evaluation is based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature. During the review process, data from national and international literature was collected and analyzed around relevant keywords and topics. The information was systematically evaluated to provide a comparative perspective in terms of older adults-friendly city projects, right to the city principles and social service strategies. According to the compiled data, neglecting the 'age' factor in the design of public spaces creates disadvantages for groups such as the older adults, children and youth, and leads to older people not being able to fully benefit from the opportunities offered by urban life. This situation causes physical, emotional, social and economic problems among the older adults. The aim of the research is to develop social service recommendations based on the principle of the right to the city to solve these problems and to enable older adults to participate in urban life in a more active and integrated way. Social work prioritizes the welfare of the older adults, who are among disadvantaged groups, and aims to empower them and improve their overall quality of life. Particularly in cities, social work offers a variety of supports to meet the specific needs of older people, aiming to ensure their access to city resources and equal opportunities. This approach embraces increasing the effectiveness of social work in urban areas and promoting public awareness and advocacy on the rights of older persons. It is argued that this participatory strategy of social work will strengthen the role of older people in urban life and contribute to creating more inclusive and just cities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• urban right
• spatial exclusion
• social work
• ageing

Proje Numarası

ORCID: 0000-0002-7821-5605

Kaynakça

1. AGE. (2016). Applying the Right to the City to older persons: the opportunity of the EU Urban Agenda. https://www.age-platform.eu/applying-the-right-to-the-city-to-older-persons-the-opportunity-of-the-eu-urban-agenda/
2. Althorpe, C., & Horak, M. (2023). The End of the Right to the City: A Radical-Cooperative View. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14-42, Article 10780874211057815. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815
3. Altun, Z. (2021). Yaşlılara yönelik sosyal politikalar ve sosyal hizmetler: Sivil toplum kuruluşları üzerinden bir değerlendirme. In (Vol. 2, pp. 30-44). Toplumsal Politika Dergisi.
4. Ayalon, L., Dolberg, P., Mikulioniene, S., Perek-Bialas, J., Rapoliene, G., Stypinska, J.,…de la Fuente-Nunez, V. (2019). A systematic review of existing ageism scales [Review]. Ageing Research Reviews, 54, Article 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100919
5. Barusch, A. S. (2013). Age-Friendly Cities: A Social Work Perspective [Editorial Material]. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56(6), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2013.826563
6. Berglund‐Snodgrass, L., Fjellfeldt, M., Högström, E., & Markström, U. (2022). A Healthy City for All? Social Services’ Roles in Collaborative Urban Development. In (Vol. 7, pp. 113-123). Urban planning.
7. Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (Eds.). (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge.
8. Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing 'age-friendly' cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457

9. Buffel, T., Rémillard-Boilard, S., Walsh, K., McDonald, B., Smetcoren, A. S., & De Donder, L. (2020). Age-friendly approaches and old-age exclusion: A cross-city analysis. In (Vol. 14, pp. 89-117). International Journal of Ageing and Later Life.
10. Carr, A., Biggs, S., & Haapala, I. (2022). Dementia and Social Inclusion-Exclusion. In In Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences (pp. 729-746). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89594-5_37
11. Chung, S., Kim, M., Auh, E. Y., & Park, N. S. (2021). Its Implications of a Discussion on Social Exclusion among Older Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), Article 8027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158027
12. Chong, W. F., & Gu, D. (2022). Critical gerontology. In Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging (pp. 1225-1246). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
13. Colglazier, W. (2015). Sustainable development agenda: 2030 [Editorial Material]. Science, 349(6252), 1048-1050. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2333
14. Drilling, M., Grove, H., Ioannou, B., & Moulaert, T. (2021). Towards a structural embeddedness of space in the framework of the social exclusion of older people. . In Social Exclusion in Later Life: Interdisciplinary and Policy Perspectives (pp. 193-207). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51406-8
15. Duff, C. (2017). The affective right to the city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(4), 516-529.
16. Fallahi, F., & Safa, A. (2023). Right to the City" theory from the perspective of geriatric nursing. . In (Vol. 12): Nursing and Midwifery Studies.
17. Friendly, A. (2013). The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil. Planning theory & practice, 14(2), 158-179.
18. Gençer, Ç., Er, F., Barut, B., & Kara, Y. (2021). Koruyucu sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda sosyal hizmet mesleğinin önemi Koruyucu sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda sosyal hizmet mesleğinin önemi. In (Vol. 32, pp. 1125-1142): Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet.
19. Habitat, U. N. (2018). Migration and inclusive cities: a guide for arab city leaders. In (2 ed.). United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
20. Heidari, M. T., Mohamadi, S., & Rahmani, M. (2021). Monitoring the theory of the right to the City in reproducing age–friendly space of the city (case study: worn-out texture of central district of Zanjan). . In (Vol. 53, pp. 195-212): Human Geography Research.
21. Jones, S. E. (2016). Ageing and the city: making urban spaces work for older people . In: HelpAge International.
22. Kalayci, E., Uzunaslan, I., & Uzunaslan, S. (2023). Caregiver burden experiences of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: A qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 69(3), 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221114564
23. Kang, J. Y., & Chungsoondool. (2017). Trajectories of experiences on material hardship among mid and old age by age group [중고령층 연령집단별 물질적 결핍 궤적 및 궤적집단 비교연구] [research-article]. 55, 5-34. https://doi.org/10.17997/swry.55.1.1.
24. Karakuş, B. (2018). Türkiye’de yaşlılara yönelik hizmetler, kurumsal yaşlı bakımı ve kurumsal yaşlı bakımında illerin durumu. In. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı.
25. Kaya, B. E., & Erbas, I. (2023). The relationship between urban transformation and sustainability: a bibliometric analysis and exploring existing trends (oct, 10.1080/13467581.2023.2270033, 2023) [Correction; Early Access]. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2281785
26. Kneale, D. (2012). Is social exclusion still important for older people? In. UCL Discovery.
27. Kuang, Y., & Lin, B. (2021). Public participation and city sustainability: Evidence from Urban Garbage Classification in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, Article 102741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102741
28. Labus, A. (2013). Concepts of urban renewal in an aging society in the XXI century-case studies in the Polish Cities. In. 17th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society.
29. Lamprini, K. (2016). Social exclusion of elderly. . In (Vol. 1, pp. 1-3): Journal of Healthcare Communications.
30. Menezes, D., Woolrych, R., Sixsmith, J., Makita, M., Smith, H., Fisher, J.,…Murray, M. (2023). 'You really do become invisible': examining older adults' right to the city in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 43(11), 2477-2496, Article Pii s0144686x21001793. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x21001793
31. Moffatt, S., & Glasgow, N. (2009). How useful is the concept of social exclusion when applied to rural older people in the United Kingdom and the United States? In (Vol. 43, pp. 1291-1303): Regional Studies.
32. Nahar Lata, L. (2021). To whom does the city belong? Obstacles to right to the city for the urban poor in Bangladesh. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(4), 638-659.
33. New York Tıp Akademisi. (2008). Yaşlı Dostu Bir Şehre Doğru: Bulgular Raporu.
34. Ortiz, E. (2008). Towards a World Charter for the Right to the City. In (pp. 97-106). UNESCO: HIC reference center in the world.
35. Phelan, A., & Ayalon, L. (2020). The intersection of ageism and elder abuse. . In (pp. 11-12): Advances in elder abuse research: Practice, legislation and policy.
36. Powers, M., Rinkel, M., & Kumar, P. (2021). Co-Creating a "Sustainable New Normal" for Social Work and Beyond: Embracing an Ecosocial Worldview [Review]. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910941.
37. Romero-Ortuno, R., Cogan, L., Cunningham, C. U., & Kenny, R. A. (2010). Do older pedestrians have enough time to cross roads in Dublin? A critique of the Traffic Management Guidelines based on clinical research findings. Age and ageing, 39(1), 80-86.
38. Ryser, J., & Franchini, T. (2022). Designing Inclusive Cities from the Elderly Perspective. In Mobility, Knowledge and Innovation Hubs in Urban and Regional Development. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2022, 27th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society, CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning. https://programm.corp.at/cdrom2022/papers2022/CORP2022_8.pdf
39. Salihoglu, T., Albayrak, A. N., & Eryilmaz, Y. (2021). A method for the determination of urban transformation areas in Kocaeli. Land Use Policy, 109, Article 105708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105708
40. Scharlach, A. (2011). Creating aging-friendly communities. Generations. In (Vol. 32, pp. 5-11). Generations
41. Schwarz, B. (2013). Environmental gerontology: What now?. In Environmental Gerontology (pp. 7-22). Routledge.
42. Seixas, E. C. (2021). Urban (Digital) Play and Right to the City: A Critical Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 636111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636111
43. Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Allam, Z., & Asadzadeh, A. (2023). Progress and prospects in planning: A bibliometric review of literature in Urban Studies and Regional and Urban Planning, 1956-2022 [Review]. Progress in Planning, 173, Article 100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2023.100740
44. Thorpe, A. (2017). Rethinking Participation, Rethinking Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 566-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1371788
45. Tomanbay, İ. (2007). Yaşlılara yönelik sosyal hizmetler. In. gebam.hacettepe.edu.tr.
46. Tournier, I., & Vidovićová, L. (2021). Introduction: Framing community and spatial exclusion. . In K. Walsh, T. Scharf, S. Van Regenmortel, & A. Wanka (Eds.), Social Exclusion in Later Life: Interdisciplinary and Policy Perspectives (pp. 185-191). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51406-8_14
47. TÜİK. (2023). İstatistiklerle Yaşlılar, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2023-53710
48. Wahl, H. W., & Oswald, F. (2010). Environmental perspectives on ageing. In The SAGE handbook of social gerontology (pp. 124 , 111).
49. Wanka, A., Moulaert, T., & Drilling, M. (2018). From environmental stress to spatial expulsion-rethinking concepts of socio-spatial exclusion in later life. . In (Vol. 12, pp. 25-51). International Journal of Ageing and Later Life.
50. Van Hoof, J., Marston, H. R., Kazak, J. K., & Buffel, T. (2021). Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and environment, 199, 107922.
51. Zarate, L. (2015). Right to the City for All: a manifesto for social justice in an urban century. In. The Nature of Cities.
52. ÖİK. (2009). Yerel Yönetimler. Katılımcılık ve Kentsel Yönetim Komisyon Raporu, Kentleşme Şurası. Ö. İ. Komisyon.
53. İKK. (2022). Yaşlı Dostu Kentler Çalıştay Raporu. https://istanbulkentkonseyi.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Yasli_Dostu_Kentler_Calistayi_Raporu_web.pdf