Kamu Özel Ortaklıklarında Çeşitli Ülkelerdeki Sözleşme Yönetiminin Yasal Çerçevesi: Türkiye İçin Öneriler

Öz

Kamu özel ortaklıkları, gelişmekte olan ülkeler için kamu hizmetlerinin görülmesinde alternatif bir finansman yöntemi olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Yüksek riskli ve karmaşık yapılı bu projeler için etkili sözleşme yönetimi önemli bir unsurdur. Bu konuda yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde görülmüştür ki kamu özel ortaklıkları sözleşme temelli olmalarına rağmen daha çok bir finansman yöntemi olarak ele alınmış ve incelenmiştir. Bu nedenle çalışmada, kamu özel ortaklıklarında sözleşme yönetimi konusunda literatür taraması yapılmış ve kamu özel ortaklıklarında sözleşme yönetimi için ana aktiviteler belirlenerek bir çerçeve ortaya konmuş, ardından gelişmekte olan ülkelerden olan Brezilya, Kenya, Kosova, Filipinler ve Türkiye’deki kanun ve yönetmelikler bu çerçeve kapsamında karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda, incelenen bu beş ülkede, yönetişim ve sözleşme yönetim ekibinin kurulması, sözleşme yönetiminin planlanması, kurulması ve yürütülmesi, sözleşme değişikliklerinin yönetilmesi, performansın yönetilmesi ve sözleşme bitişi ile varlık devri için düzenlemelere rastlanmıştır. Ancak risk yönetimi, izlenmesi ve değerlendirmesi ve ilişkilerin yönetimi konusunda yasal çerçevede eksiklikler olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Her iki faaliyet de kamu özel ortaklığı projelerinde sözleşme yönetiminin başarılı bir şekilde gerçekleşmesi için kritik önemle sahiptir. Bu bağlamda Türkiye’ye yönelik öneriler getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kamu özel ortaklığı
• kamu özel ortaklığı projesi
• inşaat sözleşmesi
• sözleşme yönetimi
• kamu özel ortaklıkları yasal çerçevesi

Legal Framework of Public-Private Partnership Contract Management in Varies Countries: Recommendations for Türkiye

Öz

Public-private partnerships emerge as an alternative financing method in providing public services for developing countries. Effective contract management is an important element for these high-risk and complex projects. For this reason, in the study, a literature review was conducted on contract management in public private partnerships and a framework was presented by determining the main activities for contract management in public private partnerships. Then, the laws and regulations in the developing countries of Brazil, Kenya, Kosovo, the Philippines and Turkiye were examined comparatively within this framework. As a result of the study, regulations were found for the establishment of administration and contract management team, planning, establishment and execution of contract management, managing contract changes, managing performance and contract termination and asset transfer, in these five countries examined. However, it has been concluded that there are deficiencies in the legal framework regarding risk management, monitoring and evaluation and relationship management, which are important criteria of contract management. Both activities are critical for successful contract management in public private partnership projects. In this context, recommendations have been made for Turkiye.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• public-private partnership
• public-private partnership project
• construction contract
• contract management
• legal framework of public-private partnership

Kaynakça

1. Almarri, K., Abuhijleh, B. (2017). A Qualitative Study for Developing a Framework for İmplementing Public–Private Partnerships In Developing Countries, Journal of Facilities Management, 15 (2), 170-189.
2. Appuhami, R., Perera, S., Perera H., (2011). Coercive Policy Diffusion in a Developing Country: The Case of Public-Private Partnerships in Sri-Lanka. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 41(3): 431-451.
3. Asian Development Bank (A.D.B.), The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (E.B.R.D.), The Inter-American Development Bank (I.D.B.), The Islamic Development Bank (I.s.D.B.), Multilateral Investment Fund (M.I.F.), Public Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (P.P.I.A.F.) and World Bank Group (W.B.G.). (2016). The A.P.M.G. Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Certification Guide Chapter 5 and 7, 1st Ed., World Bank Publications, Washington D.C., A.B.D.
4. Atasoy, H. (2011). Kamu-Özel İş Birliği Modeli ve Türkiye'de Belediyelerin Altyapı Projelerinin Finansmanında Uygulanabilirliği (In English: Public-Private Partnership Model and Its Viability ın Financing Municipalities’ Infrastructure Projects in Turkey), Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kayseri, 292861.
5. Bloomfield P. (2006). The Challenging Business of Long-Term Public – Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience, Public Administration Review, 66 (3), 400-411.
6. Boz, S.S. (2016). Kamu Özel İş Birliği (PPP) Modeli (In English: Public Private Sector Cooperation (PPP) Model), İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (2), 277-332. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.239839
7. Federative Republic of Brazil, Law No. 11.079 dated 30 December 2004, (Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2004/Lei/L11079.htm, November 2019).
8. Burnett, M. (2013). Public Private Partnership Contract Management – Still in Need of More Attention, European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 8 (3), 217-230.

9. European P.P.P. Expertise Centre (EPEC), The Guide to Guidance How to Prepare, Procure and Deliver P.P.P. Projects, 1. Baskı, Mixed Sources Yayınevi, Lüksemburg, 2011.
10. European PPP Expertise Centre (E.P.E.C.). (2015). The Guide to Guidance How to Prepare, Procure and Deliver PPP Projects, ISBN:978-92-861-1426-7, (Retrieved from https://www.utap.gov.pt/Publicacoes_interna/guide-to-guidance-en.pdf, January 2019)
11. Fombad, M.C. (2013). Accountability Challenges in Public–Private Partnerships from A South African Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 7 (1), 11-26.
12. Fu, L., Sun, H., Fang, Y., Xu, K. (2023). A Systematic Review of The Public-Private Partnership Literature Published Between 2012 And 2021, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 29(3), 238-252.
13. Global Infrastructure Hub, (2019). Managing PPP Contracts After Financial Close: Practical Guidance for Governments Managing PPP Contracts, (Retrieved from: https://content.gihub.org/live/media/1465/updated_full-document_art3_web.pdf, November 2019).
14. Gözler, K. (2009). İdare Hukuku (In English: Administrative Law), 2. Baskı, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa.
15. Gürgün, A.P., Touran, A. (2014). Public-Private Partnership Experience in the International Arena: Case of Türkiye, Journal of Management ın Engineering, 30 (6), 04014029.
16. Gürkan, M. F. (2013). Eğitim Kamu Hizmetinin Görülmesinde Kamu Özel Ortaklığı (In English: Public Private Partnership Within the Observance of Educational Public Service), Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, Konya, 354827.
17. Hodge, G., (2004). The Risky Business of Public-Private Partnerships. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 63(4): 37-49.
18. Ibrami, E. (2024). Implementation of PPP Contracts: Pros and Cons, Ninth International Scientific-Business Conference LIMEN Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2023.413
19. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. (2017). PPP Reference Guide Version 3.1,3rd ed., World Bank Publications, Washington DC.
20. Presidency of The Republic of Turkey Presidency of Strategy and Budget. (2025). Public-Private Partnership Projects ın Turkey, (Retrieved from: https://koi.sbb.gov.tr/, January 2025).
21. PPP Cell Infrastructure, Division Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance Government of India, Post Award Contract Management Guidelines for P.P.P. Concessions, Hindistan, 2015, s:16, (Retrieved from https://www.pppinindia.gov.in/documents/20181/33749/Guidelines+on+Post+Award +Contract+Management+of+PPP+Concessions/75c24213-59c6-44df-a874- 8485066ef97a on December 2019).
22. Republic of Kenya, PPP Act Dated 2013, (Retrieved from https://www.treasury.go.ke/guideline.html , November 2019).
23. Republic of Kenya, Legislative supplement No. 58 dated 19 December 2014, Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 166, (Retrieved from http://pppu.redhousestage.com/w-content/uploads/2017/11/PPP-Regulations-2014.pdf , November 2019).
24. Republic of Kosovo, Law No. 04L-045 dated 25-26 November 2011, (Retrieved from http://pppkosova.org/repository/docs/Law%20on%20public%20private%20partnership%202011%20Nr.%2004L-045%20GZ.pdf , November 2019).
25. Sarker, A., (2006). New Public Management in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Success and Failure with Particular Reference to Singapore and Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 19(2): 180-203.
26. Schick, A., (1998). Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand Reform’s? World Bank Research Observer. 13(1): 123- 131.
27. Schuhmann, R., Eichhorn, B., Reconsidering Contact Risk and Contractual Risk Management, International Journal of Law and Management, 2017, 59 (4), 504-521.
28. Sungur, C. (2018). Sağlık Sektörü Kamu Özel İş Birliği Projelerinde Riskler ve Risk Yönetimi (In English: Risks and Risk Management in Public Private Partnership Projects in Health Sector), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2018, 15 (2), 693-716.
29. Kahyaoğullari, B. (2013). Public-Private Partnerships in Developing and Developed Countries: the UK and Turkish cases. Afyon Kocatepe Universitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15(2), 243-276.
30. Kavishe, N., Jefferson, I., Chileshe, N. (2018). An Analysis of The Delivery Challenges Influencing Public-Private Partnership in Housing Projects: The Case of Tanzania, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25 (2), 202-240.
31. Komurlu R., Akyel İ., Kamu Özel Ortaklığı: Türkiye ve Diğer Ülkelerde Tarihi ve Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması (In English: Public Private Partnership: The Comparison of History and Implementation in Turkey and Other Countries), 2. International Symposium on Innovative Approaches in Scientific Studies, Samsun, 30 Kasım- 2 Aralık 2018.
32. Kul, E. (2021). Yapım Sözleşmelerinde Asgari Ekonomik Menfaat Taahhüdü, 1st Edition, Oniki Levha Yayıncılık, Istanbul. p: 105. ISBN: 978-625-7334-44-0
33. Minow, M., Public and Private Partnerships: Acconting for the New Religion, The Harvard Law Review, 2003, 116 (5), 1229-1270; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Guidelines on Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development, Unece Forum, 2000.
34. Miraftab, F., (2004). Public-Private Partnerships: The Trojan Horse of Neoliberal Development? Journal of Planning Education and Research. 24: 89-101.
35. Mitchell-Weaver, C., Manning, B., (1991). Public-Private Partnerships in Third World Development: A Conceptual Review. Studies in Comparative International Development. 26(4): 45-67.
36. Government of the State of Sao Paulo, Law No. 11.688 dated 19 May 2004, (Retrieved from https://www.al.sp.gov.br/norma/?id=50875 , November 2019).
37. Teşli, A.T. (2012). (Kamu Özel İş Birliği) PPP Projelerinin Hukuki Rejimi (In English: (Public Private Partnership) Legal Regime of PPP Projects), Group Law Publishing Yayıncılık, İstanbul. ISBN: 978-605-62755-0-0.
38. The World Bank Group, (Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/home , January 2025).
39. The World Bank Group Public-Private Partnership Resource Center, (2007). 4ps: A Guide to Contract Management for PFI and PPP Projects, (Retrieved from https://library.pppknowledgelab.org/documents/4326 , September 2019).
40. The World Bank Group PPP Knowledge Lab, Türkiye PPP Framework, (Retrieved from https://pppknowledgelab.org/countries/Türkiye , December 2017).
41. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti. 2005 Tarihli ve 5302 Sayılı İl Özel İdaresi Kanunu (In English: Provincial Special Administration Law No. 5302, dated 2005), (Retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.5302.pdf , August 2019).
42. Uğur, A., Miynat, M. (2014). Kamu Özel Sektör Ortaklıklarının Ekonomi Politiği (In English: Political Economy of Public Private Partnerships), Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 21 (2), 19-41.
43. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), (2011). A Guidebook on Public-Private Partnership in Infrastructure, (Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/ppp_guidebook.pdf , October 2018).
44. Zhang, Y., Tan, W. (2019). The Leading Small Group: An Institutional Innovation for PPP Projects in China, Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9 (2), Sayı: 2, 291-301.