Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluating Balıkesir’s Potential for Green Hydrogen Production and Export

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 6 20 Kasım 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Evaluating Balıkesir’s Potential for Green Hydrogen Production and Export

Abstract

This research evaluates Balıkesir Province’s potential for producing and exporting green hydrogen, aligning with Turkey’s renewable energy plan. This research examines the fundamental variables that make Balıkesir a favorable site for green hydrogen facilities, notably the development of plentiful renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power. The study takes a mixed-methods approach, combining data analysis with stakeholder interviews to assess the infrastructure, policy environment, and investment patterns influencing the viability of green hydrogen projects in the region. The findings emphasize Balıkesir’s strategic benefits, including its closeness to key industrial markets and export ports, facilitating local and worldwide hydrogen distribution. However, the literature study revealed considerable impediments to attaining these benefits, such as the requirement for large financial investment and the development of specialized technologies and expertise. The report also examines the regulatory adjustments required to enable an expanding hydrogen economy. This study offers regulatory suggestions and collaborative models for Balıkesir’s transition to green hydrogen, adding to the scientific discussion on sustainable energy generation. It also offers vital information for investors and regulators about the scalability of hydrogen technology in regional contexts.

Keywords

Green hydrogen , Renewable energy , Export potential , Sustainable development

Kaynakça

  1. Abulfotuh, F. (2007). Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies: The Way to Sustainable Wnergy Future. Desalination, 209(1-3), 275-282.
  2. Ahad, M. T., Bhuiyan, M. M. H., Sakib, A. N., & Siddique, Z. (2023). An Overview of Challenges for the Future of Hydrogen. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 16(20), 1-28.
  3. Ahmed, S. F., Mofijur, M., Nuzhat, S., Rafa, N., Musharrat, A., Lam, S. S., & Boretti, A. (2022). Sustainable Hydrogen Production: Technological Advancements and Economic Analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(88), 37227-37255.
  4. Ajanovic, A., & Haas, R. (2018). Economic Prospects and Policy Framework for Hydrogen as Fuel in the Transport Sector. Energy Policy, 123, 280-288.
  5. Ajiboye, Y., Ojo, O. L., Kayode, J. F., Awolusi, T., Jayesimi, B., Afolalu, S. A., ... & Ilevbare, M. (2024, April). The Future of Green Hydrogen in the Global Economy: Opportunities, Challenges and Implications. In 2024 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Driving Sustainable Development Goals (SEB4SDG) (pp. 1-28). IEEE.
  6. Al Irsyad, M. I., Halog, A. B., Nepal, R., & Koesrindartoto, D. P. (2017). Selecting Tools for Renewable Energy Analysis in Developing Countries: An Expanded Review. Frontiers in Energy Research, 5, 34.
  7. Amer, M., & Daim, T. U. (2011). Selection of Renewable Energy Technologies for A Developing County: A Case of Pakistan. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4), 420-435.
  8. Ang, T. Z., Salem, M., Kamarol, M., Das, H. S., Nazari, M. A., & Prabaharan, N. (2022). A Comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications,Sthallenges and Suggestions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43, 1-27.
  9. Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Chaparro-González, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J. P., & Pla-Rubio, A. (2014). An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Approach for the Selection of Solar-Thermal Power Plant Investment Projects. Energy, 66, 222-238.
  10. Avrupa Komisyonu (European Commission). (2020). A Hydrogen Strategy for a Climate-Neutral Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Com-Mittee and the Committee of the Regions.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sezer, S. (2025). Evaluating Balıkesir’s Potential for Green Hydrogen Production and Export. Kent Akademisi, 18(6), 3335-3355. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1566858