İslam ve Çevre Yönetimi: Sürdürülebilir Su Ekolojisine Bütüncül Bir Yaklaşım

Öz

Bu çalışma, çevre yönetimi uygulamaları ve İslami yaklaşımların Türkiye’de sürdürülebilir su ekolojisini geliştirmek amacıyla nasıl entegre edilebileceğini araştırmaktadır. Nüfus artışı, kentleşme ve sanayileşme nedeniyle tatlı su kaynakları üzerindeki baskının artması, sürdürülebilir yönetim stratejilerinin önemini artırmaktadır. R programlama dili kullanılarak yapılan araştırma, sürdürülebilir su yönetimi için temel unsurlar olarak yeşil teknolojilerin, çevre politikalarının ve vatandaş katılımının entegrasyonuna odaklanmaktadır. Su kalitesi izleme sistemleri ve ekosistem tabanlı yönetim gibi ileri teknolojilerin, su kirliliğinin azaltılması ve su ekosistemlerinin korunmasında etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bibliyometrik analizler, İslami yaklaşımlar ile modern çevre yönetimi stratejilerinin entegrasyonunun yerel ve küresel bağlamdaki etkilerini analiz ederek önemli bir literatür katkısı sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, bu makale İslami ilkelerin su yönetimindeki rolünü tartışmakta ve su kaynaklarının korunması ve muhafazası konusunda ‘‘Halifelik’’ kavramını dini bir yükümlülük olarak vurgulamaktadır. Bibliyometrik analizlerle yapılan çalışma, çevre yönetimi uygulamalarının İslami öğretilerle bütünleştirilmesinin, özellikle dini değerlerin günlük yaşamın önemli bir parçası olduğu bölgelerde, su koruma çabalarını önemli ölçüde artırabileceği sonucuna varmaktadır. Sonuçlar, sürdürülebilir su ekolojisine ulaşmak için çağdaş teknolojileri, politikaları, vatandaş katılımını ve dini ilkeleri birleştiren bütüncül bir stratejinin gerekli olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Su
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• R Programlama Dili
• Yönetim
• Bibliyometri

Islam and Environmental Management: A Holistic Approach to Sustainable Water Ecology

Abstract

This study explores the integration of environmental management practices and Islamic approaches to foster sustainable water ecology in Turkey. Given the increasing pressures on freshwater resources due to urbanization, industrialization, and population growth, sustainable management strategies have become crucial. The research conducted using the R programming language, focuses on the integration of green technologies, environmental policies, and citizen participation as key elements in achieving sustainable water management. Advanced technologies, such as water quality monitoring systems and ecosystem-based management, are identified as effective strategies for reducing water pollution and preserving aquatic ecosystems. Bibliometric analyses provide a significant contribution to the literature by analyzing the impacts of integrating Islamic approaches with modern environmental management strategies in both local and global contexts. Additionally, the paper highlights the role of Islamic principles in water management, emphasizing the concept of ‘‘Khilafah’’ as a religious obligation to protect and conserve water resources. The study concludes through bibliometric analysis that integrating environmental management practices with Islamic teachings can significantly enhance water conservation efforts, especially in regions where religious values are deeply ingrained in daily life. The findings suggest that a holistic strategy combining contemporary technologies, policies, citizen participation, and religious principles is essential for achieving sustainable water ecology.

Keywords

• Water
• Sustainability
• R Programming Language
• Management
• Bibliometrics

Kaynakça

1. Abdel Haleem, M. (1989). Water in the Qur'an. Islamic Quarterly, 33(1), 26-44.
2. Abdul Kadir, F. K., Rusli, N., Embong, A. H., Ab. Rahman, A. H., & Ali, N. (2023). The role of humans as caliphs in protecting nature. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 5, e2023059.
3. Ahmad, R. (2018). Islamic Principles in Environmental Management: Case Studies from Malaysia. Green Publishers.
4. Akın, S., & Özdemir, A. (2020). Su kaynaklarının kullanımı ve sürdürülebilirlik. Çevre ve Doğa Dergisi, 6(2), 45-58.
5. Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M., & Burkholder, J. M. (2014). Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries and Coasts, 25(4), 704-726.
6. Anderson, K., Peters, E., & McDonald, A. (2014). Innovative technologies for water sustainability. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(6), 3125-3133.
7. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrics: An R tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
8. Berry, E. T. (2013). Religious environmental activism: From conservation to climate change. Religion Compass, 7(10), 454-464.

9. Bratton, S. P. (2020). Religion and the environment: A primer. Routledge.
10. Chuvieco, E. (2012). Religious approaches to water management and environmental conservation. Water Policy, 14(S1), 9-20.
11. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.
12. Demirel, B., Şahin, Ü., & Güneş, K. (2018). Integrating Islamic principles into water resource management: A case study from Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 1-10.
13. Dominguez, P., Bourbouze, A., Demay, S., Genin, D., & Kosoy, N. (2012). The multiple ecological, economic, and socio-cultural values of a traditional communal natural resource management system in Aït Ikiss, High Atlas, Morocco. Environmental Values, 21(3), 277-296.
14. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
15. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability, and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.
16. Foltz, R. C. (2003). Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust. Harvard University Press.
17. Gleick, P. H. (2003). Water use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 275-314.
18. Greeley, A. (1993). Religion and attitudes towards the environment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19-28.
19. Güven, B., & Harmancıoğlu, N. (2020). Water resource management in Türkiye: Challenges and recommendations. Water International, 45(3), 250-265.
20. Güven, F. (2024). Reshaping the Industrial Policy Framework of Türkiye: Integrating Exports at the Core of AI-Driven Development. Industrial Policy, 4(1), 4-10.
21. Intahphuak, S., Pamala, N., Yodkhong, B., & Buakhiao, A. (2017). The role of religion in community movements for solid waste management. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 43(4), 321-327.
22. Jenkins, W., & Chapple, C. K. (2011). Religion and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 441-463.
23. Kadir, İ., Öztürk, A., & Yılmaz, E. (2023). Doğanın Korunmasında İnsan Sorumluluğu: İslam Perspektifi. İstanbul: İslam Yayınları.
24. Khan, M. (2019). Faith-Based Water Management Practices and Their Impact on Water Quality. Water Resources Journal, 25(3), 85-90.
25. Kumar, M., Furumai, H., & Kurisu, F. (2011). Techno-economic evaluation of advanced wastewater treatment processes for reuse. Desalination and Water Treatment, 35(1-3), 89-100.
26. Kuzudişli, A. (2014). Çevre bilincinin gelişmesine dinin katkısı ve İslam’ın çevre duyarlılığıyla eşleştirilebiliecek bazı temel öğretileri. İçinde İ. Günaydın (Ed.), Uluslararası katılımlı çevre sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı (ss. 145-154). Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Yayınları.
27. Maingey, Y., Opondo, M., Olago, D., & Ouma, G. (2022). Impacts of increasing water scarcity and potential for water-related conflicts in Lamu, Kenya. Water Supply, 22(2), 1983-1994.
28. McKibben, B. (2013). Religious and Ecology News Articles. Religion, 2013.
29. Muhammad, S., & Amal, S. (2020). Religion-based water management campaigns for sustainable development: Expectations and challenges. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 477(1), 012018.
30. Muhammadi, M., & Haftador, H. R. (2014). Fundamental principles of environmental ethics in Islamic discourse. Advances in Environmental Biology, 947-953.
31. Murray, C. J. L. (2020). Global burden of disease study: Risk factors and causes of death. The Lancet, 396(10258), 1223–1274.
32. Özdemir, D., & Elveren, A. Y. (2019). Urbanization and environmental quality: Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7), 6690-6701.
33. Prüss-Ustün, A., Wolf, J., Bartram, J., Clasen, T., Cumming, O., & Freeman, M. C. (2019). Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(4), 1-13.
34. Rashman, D., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2020). Exploring sustainable development goals through bibliometric mapping: Case studies and thematic evaluations. Sustainability Science, 15(3), 200-220.
35. Sarfo-Mensah, P., Owusu-Bi, A., Awuah-Nyamekye, S., & Amisah, S. (2014). Conservation of the environment and preservation of cultural heritage: Assets for tourism development in Ghana's Akyem Abuakwa traditional area. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 18(1), 30-53.
36. Schmidt, J. (2023). From integration to intersectionality: A review of water ethics. Water Alternatives.
37. Smith, J. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis in Environmental Studies. Academic Press.
38. Şeker, M., & İkis, M. (2023). İlahiyat, işletme, eğitim bilimleri ve psikoloji alanında bağlanma, Tanrı ve din hakkında hazırlanan tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 17-34.
39. Şimşek, A., Türkten, H., & Bakan, G. (2022). Su Kalite İndeksi ve İstatistiksel Analiz Kullanılarak Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi Kızılırmak ve Yeşilırmak Nehirleri Su Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 61-78.
40. Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418(6898), 671-677.
41. Tsalis, T., Amarantidou, S., Calabró, P., Nikolaou, I., & Komilis, D. (2018). Willingness to participate and key factors affecting door-to-door recycling collection programs: A case study of Xanthi, Greece. Waste Management & Research, 36(9), 760-766.
42. TÜİK. (2019). Population projections, 2018-2080. Turkish Statistical Institute.
43. UNICEF. (2021). Progress on drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene: 2021 update and SDG baselines. https://www.unicef.org/reports/wash-progress-2021
44. Üstün, B., & Keskin, G. A. (2020). Industrial water pollution in Turkey: Causes and solutions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(3), 185.
45. Yılmaz, H. (2017). Religious Approaches to Water Management in Turkey. Environmental Policy Review, 12(2), 130-140.
46. Vazquez, M. L. (2018). People carrying water: Religious and secular perspectives on legal water management. Quaderni di diritto e politica ecclesiastica, (2). Università di Parma. https://doi.org/10.1440/91066
47. Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., ... & Davies, P. M. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467(7315), 555-561.
48. Wardropper, C. B., Chang, C., & Rissman, A. R. (2016). Frontiers of interdisciplinary environmental research. Nature Sustainability, 5, 125-135.
49. Warren-Rhodes, K., Schwarz, A. M., Boyle, L. N., Albert, J., Agalo, S. S., Warren, R., ... & Duke, N. (2011). Mangrove ecosystem services and potential for carbon revenue programs in the Solomon Islands. Environmental Conservation, 38(4), 485-496.
50. White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203-1207.
51. WHO. (2021). Water, sanitation and hygiene: Global status report. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health
52. WHO & UNICEF. (2020). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene: Special focus on inequalities. https://www.who.int/reports/wash-inequalities